DJLegacy of LC Forum Proves Gravy Dead Wrong!

DJLegacy2k5 said:
If the "study" was asking a group of military men to plan out an attack that used boxcutters to take of planes to fly them into the WTCs and to also use explosives in the process...You don't find that to suggest anything?
Click to expand...

No more so than Tom Clancy having DEBT OF HONOR end with a terrorist flying a plane out of Dulles into the Capital building. It is an example of thinking like the enemy. White hat hackers do this all the time.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
If the "study" was asking a group of military men to plan out an attack that used boxcutters to take of planes to fly them into the WTCs and to also use explosives in the process...You don't find that to suggest anything?
Click to expand...


It might.

But you might ask why the military ever practices landing on a beach, parachuting onto a mountain, or flying in formation.

Now where is the evidence of explosives?

Not explosions.

Explosives.

Things that go boom might be explosions, but they might not be explosives.

Your can of shaving cream is not an explosive.

But if you put it in the fire, I wouldn't stand too close for fear of being hit with a jagged piece of metal from the explosion.

It suggests a lot of things
 
Last edited:
Exactly my point...You all have no proof of anything that went on on 9/11....except someone TOLD you what to believe...If they had said "bombs blew up in the buildings" you all would say "yeah I see that, look at all the reports of explosions"...you wouldnt be trying to DISPROVE something that you cant understand...

Its quite sad...If I had a close mind like what you all have, Id probably slit my wrists...Thats a sad way to live.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
Exactly my point...You all have no proof of anything that went on on 9/11....except someone TOLD you what to believe...If they had said "bombs blew up in the buildings" you all would say "yeah I see that, look at all the reports of explosions"...you wouldnt be trying to DISPROVE something that you cant understand...

Its quite sad...If I had a close mind like what you all have, Id probably slit my wrists...Thats a sad way to live.
Click to expand...


With apologies to Pardalis, have you considered Cananda?

They take in refugees.
 
As I said...This wasnt a plan about hijacked airplanes, it was specifically for the use of boxcutters, airplanes, and explosives.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
Exactly my point...You all have no proof of anything that went on on 9/11....except someone TOLD you what to believe...If they had said "bombs blew up in the buildings" you all would say "yeah I see that, look at all the reports of explosions"...you wouldnt be trying to DISPROVE something that you cant understand...

Its quite sad...If I had a close mind like what you all have, Id probably slit my wrists...Thats a sad way to live.
Click to expand...

There was a lot of proof.....it was all over the news. They also found some of the hijackers passports and I think they found a few bandannas. They also found a complete copy of the plans and everyones name in some luggage that got misplaces. It is not to hard to see they had all the smoking guns within the first few days. Open and shut case. You need to look up on this subject.:jaw-dropp
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
Exactly my point...You all have no proof of anything that went on on 9/11....except someone TOLD you what to believe...If they had said "bombs blew up in the buildings" you all would say "yeah I see that, look at all the reports of explosions"...you wouldnt be trying to DISPROVE something that you cant understand...
Click to expand...

No, no-one told me what to BELIEVE, they showed me evidence of what happened, and I looked at it, and came to my own conclusions. If someone told me there were bombs in the builidings I'd look at evidence,videos and the like (as I did when CTs said there were) and I'd see how that statement compared to the evidence.
 
I do think that their might...but that's not were I'd start out.

There have been several "I was involed with the military" (or "I was a secret agent and I knew") type stories out there, some that come from some real whakos. First thing's first, try to figure out if this guy is a loon, if he really is who he says he is, if he was were he says he was, and if these exersises in question were actually what he claims that they were (like many of the other alledged pre 9/11 exersises that turned out to quite be so ominous).

You'll forgive me if I approach this story with skeptisism.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
Exactly my point...You all have no proof of anything that went on on 9/11....except someone TOLD you what to believe...If they had said "bombs blew up in the buildings" you all would say "yeah I see that, look at all the reports of explosions"...you wouldnt be trying to DISPROVE something that you cant understand...

Its quite sad...If I had a close mind like what you all have, Id probably slit my wrists...Thats a sad way to live.
Click to expand...

No, the answers you received to your "egg" scenario are specific to the egg scenario. You said, in your hypothetical, that you said you would egg so-and-sos house, the house was subsequently TP'd, and there is no other evidence available to base your decision upon. This is not analogous to 9/11 as their is ample evidence available for review, analysis; and, if appropropriate, refutation.

Stop with the personal attacks and present some evidence that can be reviewed.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
As I said...This wasnt a plan about hijacked airplanes, it was specifically for the use of boxcutters, airplanes, and explosives.
Click to expand...

That's not bizzarre. Airports check for explosives, so firearms are diffcult to smuggle onto planes. Why carry out an exercise dealing with an event that is unlikely to ever happen?
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
I have documented evidence of a man that was a part of a military study in which these men were asked to plan an "attack" that would hijack planes with boxcutters and use explosives to bring down the world trade centers.
Click to expand...

DJLegacy2k5 said:
As I said...This wasnt a plan about hijacked airplanes, it was specifically for the use of boxcutters, airplanes, and explosives.
Click to expand...
Which is it?
 
All you people do is make excuses....

You lack the ability to connect 2 and 2 to make 4. To you all and Negative times a Negative would NEVER equal a positive...

It's quite sad.
 
Last edited:
2 and 2 = 4 is based on evidence.

So far, you have not provided evidence.

Just innuendo.
 
DJLegacy2k5 said:
All you people do is make excuses....

You lack the ability to connect 2 and 2 to make 4. To you all and Negative times and Negative would NEVER equal a positive...

It's quite sad.
Click to expand...
As predicted, you've also changed the subject from refuting Gravy's rebuttal to Loose Change.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom