Did Jackie Kennedy kill JFK?

Sledge said:
Which you don't, so I suggest you stop trying to lecture others on them.
Click to expand...

I know enough to know that the amount of visible smoke from a gun is very much dependent on the weather condition; resulting in all the way from barely visible smoke to heavy smoke.

Next.
 
Cool. Now tell us about this .32 derringer that delivers a gunshot wound indistinguishable from a rifle bullet.
 
Cool. Now tell us about this .32 derringer that delivers a gunshot wound indistinguishable from a rifle bullet.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Check out the Zapruder film and watch Jackie Kennedy's behavior. It looks to me like she shot JFK point-blank. Notice the rigid position of her right elbow just before the head shot. Also, there is possibly gun smoke appearing around JFK's head exactly at the time of the head shot. Plus, trajectories of fragments can be seen shooting upwards in some frames. Mr. Connally also acts suspicious. It looks like he pretends to be clueless directly after the neck shot (at which time JFK seems to be affected by some fast-acting poison and goes limp like a rag doll). And meanwhile Jackie is holding a steady gaze at Mr. Connally! That's strange, isn't it? Shouldn't she at that moment be more concerned about the health of her husband? Then it looks like Mr. Connally briefly turns to meet Jackie's gaze and quietly gives a go ahead order to Jackie who then puts her arm behind JFK's head and then bang!

Zapruder sequence in slow motion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-cri43ttTo
Click to expand...

Sorry, but we all know this is how it happened:

 
"Is Michelle Obama the next Jackie Kennedy?

I accidentally came across an entertainment program interviewing Michelle Obama and comparing her to Jackie Kennedy. What do you think of this comparison? Is Michelle Obama the next Jackie?"

http://askville.amazon.com/Michelle-Obama-Jackie-Kennedy/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=9613366

JFK, a Harvard student.
Barack Obama, a Harvard student.

Oh my! Watch out Barack Obama!!! :eek:

:D Couldn't resist the far-fetched connection.
 
Anders Lindman said:
:D Couldn't resist the far-fetched connection.
Click to expand...
We've seen ample evidence of your inability to resist numerous far-fetched connections in this thread. This latest post fits in quite nicely with all the other flights of fancy you seem to offer up as evidence of who knows what.
 
Anders Lindman said:
In Oliver Stone's JFK movie, Mr. X says (about JFK): "... he wanted to call off the moon race..." Listen from about 2:40 in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyJEWHUyh0o

What a load of crock! I'm sure most of the statements in the JFK movie are true, but the part about the moon mission, here is what JFK said (as I have already posted before):
<snip>

So why did Oliver Stone allow such blatant lie to be put into his movie? Or maybe he didn't check the facts himself.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid I simply couldn't let this pass unchallenged.

If you're 'sure most of the statements in the JFK movie are true' then you're sadly mistaken. Huge swathes of the JFK movie are completely fictional, and are often based on Jim Garrison's strangely deluded recollection of 'facts' and sometimes simply invented out of thin air to make the plot more 'interesting'

It's not a documentary, it's a work of fiction. It's not a source for anything other than how to make movies (or not, depending on your view of the film)

Even starting with The JFK 100 or John McAdams' nice analysis should give you pause for thought
 
SezMe said:
We've seen ample evidence of your inability to resist numerous far-fetched connections in this thread. This latest post fits in quite nicely with all the other flights of fancy you seem to offer up as evidence of who knows what.
Click to expand...

He he. Sorry about that. I like to propose a whole spectrum of ideas. I actually had a more clever connection between Jackie Kennedy and Michelle Obama, but I have forgot exactly what it was and I haven't saved any info about that. Darn. Something about how their past was linked via another person, via education or via people who introduced them to their husbands, something like that. At least a more interesting connection than the lame Harvard connection between their husbands I posted above.
 
Worm said:
I'm afraid I simply couldn't let this pass unchallenged.

If you're 'sure most of the statements in the JFK movie are true' then you're sadly mistaken. Huge swathes of the JFK movie are completely fictional, and are often based on Jim Garrison's strangely deluded recollection of 'facts' and sometimes simply invented out of thin air to make the plot more 'interesting'

It's not a documentary, it's a work of fiction. It's not a source for anything other than how to make movies (or not, depending on your view of the film)

Even starting with The JFK 100 or John McAdams' nice analysis should give you pause for thought
Click to expand...

Ok, yes, I was a bit insincere there. I meant that what Mr. X said in the movie could have been essentially correct. The whole JFK film on the other hand is basically disinfo imo, controlled opposition conspiracy theory to reinforce the smokescreen of established bogus JFK conspiracy theories.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Here is a hilarious example of B-movie acting. Watch from around 0:25 the policeman in a hat to the left in the picture (to the right of Lee Harvey Oswald), how he gets angry. lmao. Totally staged. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xU7Lhd7Wwo

In a real situation like that, the policeman would have reacted with stress, not anger. This sequence was included in Oliver Stone's JFK movie, but with the angry policeman edited out. I wonder why. Not. :rolleyes:

This, is how security personnel react in a real threatening situation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoZeZprXnDg

Not like some B-movie actor pretending to get angry.
Click to expand...

Again, you simply can't say how any one individual will react in a particular situation.

Look at how Prince Charles' security brilliantly leapt to his defence when a Cambodian man with a starter pistol attacked him. Not the finest response:



The man you are talking about, James R. Leavelle, is still alive by the way. What you are saying clearly implicates him in some kind of plot. As much as you are almost certainly simply trolling, spreading ******** on the Internet is still libellous.
 
angrysoba said:
Again, you simply can't say how any one individual will react in a particular situation.

Look at how Prince Charles' security brilliantly leapt to his defence when a Cambodian man with a starter pistol attacked him. Not the finest response:



The man you are talking about, James R. Leavelle, is still alive by the way. What you are saying clearly implicates him in some kind of plot. As much as you are almost certainly simply trolling, spreading ******** on the Internet is still libellous.
Click to expand...

No trolling. And the attack on Prince Charles looks kind of staged too.

I found a video with Jim Leavelle (the same as James I assume): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CYtj0A4Y_U

At the end of the video he says something interesting: "What I really like for them to remember is the truth of what happened in both incidents [the attack on Pearl Harbor and Lee Harvey Oswald being shot]."

Remember: Pearl Harbor = false flag attack.
 
Anders Lindman said:
No trolling. And the attack on Prince Charles looks kind of staged too.
Click to expand...

Well, sure it was. And I suppose the one on Ronald Reagan wasn't. And how do you judge which ones are staged? The ones that look to you like they are staged. And if you are shown one that has similar features then that too must be staged. (Isn't this of the No True Scotsman variety or simply circular logic?)


Remember: Pearl Harbor = false flag attack.
Click to expand...

That's true! All those US naval pilots probably thought it was a little weird when asked to fly in specially manufactured Zeros. Fortunately for the New World Order none of them ever blabbed and even more fortunately the Japanese government was fooled into thinking they really had orchestrated the whole thing.

:rolleyes:
 
JFK had been urgently recalled to Teh Lizard Overlords' home planet, to explain his risky policy of allowing the humans a space program. This risked their discovery of teh lizards hollow moonbase with its massive gold reserves. JFK's prolonged absence had to be explained somehow.

Conveniently, one of his lookalikes had its self-destruct charge already surgically implanted in its head. The charge was activated by pressing on its throat as shown in the Zapruder film. This self-destruct behaviour was pre-programmed, and activated using a short range transmitter disguised as a Rolleiflex TLR camera.

By a quite remarkable coincidence, just before the fake assassination could be activated, some maniac with a rifle shot the lookalike in the head, thereby destroying any evidence.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I know enough to know that the amount of visible smoke from a gun is very much dependent on the weather condition; resulting in all the way from barely visible smoke to heavy smoke.

Next.
Click to expand...



Well, since you know so much about gunsmoke, it logically follows that you know something about guns. Now, inform us as to what weapon and what bullet (the caliber) were use to fit the observed evidence. Remember, the gun had to be small enough not to be seen at all by anyone, the bullet had to be large and fast enough to do the damage seen, while at the same time small and slow enough to not cause any visible recoil. No more paranoid rants, please, just the type of gun and the caliber of ammunition.
 
TheRedWorm said:
Well, since you know so much about gunsmoke, it logically follows that you know something about guns. Now, inform us as to what weapon and what bullet (the caliber) were use to fit the observed evidence. Remember, the gun had to be small enough not to be seen at all by anyone, the bullet had to be large and fast enough to do the damage seen, while at the same time small and slow enough to not cause any visible recoil. No more paranoid rants, please, just the type of gun and the caliber of ammunition.
Click to expand...

I'm too lazy to measure, but you can see the size of the entry wound here: http://www.paulseaton.com/jfk/diagrams/piks1/boh1.jpg
 
Jack by the hedge said:
JFK had been urgently recalled to Teh Lizard Overlords' home planet, to explain his risky policy of allowing the humans a space program. This risked their discovery of teh lizards hollow moonbase with its massive gold reserves. JFK's prolonged absence had to be explained somehow.
Click to expand...

Thank you. I was just going to say that the only way to make this Jackie theory more retarded is to add extraterrestrials.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom