Did Jackie Kennedy kill JFK?

Anders Lindman said:
As I wrote, the recoil could have affected mostly Jackie's left arm (which is not much visible in the Zapruder film). It looks like she is holding the weapon with both hands. And her right elbow (held in a very rigid position just before the head shot) jerks slightly at the time of the shot (or maybe even slightly before the shot happens).
Click to expand...

Do you really have nothing else to do?
 
Anders Lindman; said:
"ImageShack is an intuitive and easy-to-use free media hosting service. It can be used to upload images, flash files, and movies, and share them with friends using any imaginable means."

http://imageshack.us/content.php?page=faq

[qimg]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/7379/jfk.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

The original autopsy and and WC were quite correct that there was a bullet hole in hte EOP region of his skull.
 
Anders Lindman said:
No, no, I'm not trolling. I think there is something to this theory. And if I'm correct (needless to say, I am) then all those other theories that have existed for decades are basically controlled opposition! Created as smokescreens for conspiracy believers to endlessly chew on, like: "Here Fido, catch."
Click to expand...

You are not correct.Bring on another of your fantasy threads,this one is rapidly reaching it's sell by date.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Ok, the man with what I think is a motion film camera could be a still picture camera, and the man with what I think is a tape recorder plus microphone could be another type of still photo camera, and that the man stops filming could be that I mistake a reflex of light for him lowering the camera. Still, I'm not convinced that my interpretation is entirely wrong.

Here are two frames from the Zapruder film:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z341.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z354.jpg

All frames can be found here: http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/
Click to expand...

I think i've hilited your problem.
 
BobHaulk said:
maybe LHO wasn't in the school book depository but on the moon with a super duper rifle. It would be a tough shot but after five years training with the russians oswald was a crack shot
Click to expand...

LHO was 'the man in the moon"? How deep is this rabbit hole?
 
SezMe said:
Now here's a claim we can all evaluate. I've looked at it twice and I see no rolling of eyes or smirking. Anders, Give the time marks where these occur.
Click to expand...

I may be wrong about that, but Lyndon B. Johnson, the vice president to the left in the picture, behind JFK, looks at least less than proud to me. Watch from about 2:10 in the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_JlSdRCg7g

LBJ had himself suggested the moon mission in a memorandum to JFK! And wrote that it would be 'an achievement of great propaganda value' and 'essential as an objective':

Page 2, section g: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/Apollomon/apollo2.pdf

And look how happy LBJ looks when JFK announces the good news! Not really. What LBJ is really doing in the video is pretending to dislike the idea of going to the moon as a stupid project, when in fact that was a part of a very large plan that involved sacrificing the puppet president JFK later on.
 
Ranb said:
The lighting in the image you linked to is explained by light reflecting from the lunar surface. Your ignorance in the field of photography is not evidence of a hoax.

Ranb
Click to expand...

No, there are no clouds or other things that can cause a shadow like that on the moon. The supposed 'sunlight' is shining both on the side facing the camera and from the right: http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5205/88768851.gif

You can clearly see in the picture that the direct 'sunlight' is coming from the right and that the left side of the lunar module is the shadow side away from the supposed sunlight (studio spotlights).
 
Anders Lindman said:
I may be wrong about that, but Lyndon B. Johnson, the vice president to the left in the picture, behind JFK, looks at least less than proud to me. Watch from about 2:10 in the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_JlSdRCg7g

LBJ had himself suggested the moon mission in a memorandum to JFK! And wrote that it would be 'an achievement of great propaganda value' and 'essential as an objective':

Page 2, section g: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/Apollomon/apollo2.pdf

And look how happy LBJ looks when JFK announces the good news! Not really. What LBJ is really doing in the video is pretending to dislike the idea of going to the moon as a stupid project, when in fact that was a part of a very large plan that involved sacrificing the puppet president JFK later on.
Click to expand...
Translation: My claim regarding rolling eyes and smirking is wrong but I'm too single-minded to admit it. Maybe some diversionary, wishy-washy statements will get me by.
 
SezMe said:
Translation: My claim regarding rolling eyes and smirking is wrong but I'm too single-minded to admit it. Maybe some diversionary, wishy-washy statements will get me by.
Click to expand...

To continue with some speculative things. Watch from about 2:56 in this video where Mr. Connally says: "In the space of a few seconds, it's unbelievable what can happen." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP04_lGjkO0

And he briefly looks into the camera. He was making a reference to the extremely thoroughly beforehand planned operation that lasted only a few seconds during which JFK was assassinated.
 
Years ago I would needle JFK conspiracy buffs with the theory that Jackie finally got sick of her husbands endless parade of dames into his bedroom, aside from Jack Kennedy's chauvanistic disrespect for her and decided to have him offed. I would argue that the affair with Marilyn Monroe was the final straw so Jackie arranged to have Jacked snuffed out as the adulterous pig he was; in her endeavour she was aided by Maria Oswald who got her husband to do it and Jackie paid her by arranging through mob mistress Judith Esker to have Lee knocked off, as payment to Maria who was tired of being an abused wife. Judith was just plain sick of Jack being both a disgusting chauvanist and a lousy lover. Oh abnd Jackie arranged the assasination to happen the way it did because she wanted to personally see her ##$%^^@$ of a husband get his brains blown out in front of her.

Of course I meant it as a joke and a way of needling conspiracy nut jobs. I'm frankly aghast that anyone would take this seriously.

I hope this is a joke!
 
Here is a hilarious example of B-movie acting. Watch from around 0:25 the policeman in a hat to the left in the picture (to the right of Lee Harvey Oswald), how he gets angry. lmao. Totally staged. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xU7Lhd7Wwo

In a real situation like that, the policeman would have reacted with stress, not anger. This sequence was included in Oliver Stone's JFK movie, but with the angry policeman edited out. I wonder why. Not. :rolleyes:

This, is how security personnel react in a real threatening situation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoZeZprXnDg

Not like some B-movie actor pretending to get angry.
 
Pacal said:
Years ago I would needle JFK conspiracy buffs with the theory that Jackie finally got sick of her husbands endless parade of dames into his bedroom, aside from Jack Kennedy's chauvanistic disrespect for her and decided to have him offed. I would argue that the affair with Marilyn Monroe was the final straw so Jackie arranged to have Jacked snuffed out as the adulterous pig he was; in her endeavour she was aided by Maria Oswald who got her husband to do it and Jackie paid her by arranging through mob mistress Judith Esker to have Lee knocked off, as payment to Maria who was tired of being an abused wife. Judith was just plain sick of Jack being both a disgusting chauvanist and a lousy lover. Oh abnd Jackie arranged the assasination to happen the way it did because she wanted to personally see her ##$%^^@$ of a husband get his brains blown out in front of her.

Of course I meant it as a joke and a way of needling conspiracy nut jobs. I'm frankly aghast that anyone would take this seriously.

I hope this is a joke!
Click to expand...

No, THIS is a joke: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xU7Lhd7Wwo
 
boooeee said:
Now we're getting somewhere.
Click to expand...

If you know about weapons you would understand that the amount of visible smoke from a gun is heavily dependent on the weather condition such as temperature and humidity in the air.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom