Cleon
King of the Pod People
materia3 said:1. Arafat was not a Palestinian. He was 100% Egyptian.
Christ. This myth is still circulating?
Arafat was Palestinian. He was born in Cairo to fairly Palestinian parents who travelled to Egypt often; he spent his youth going back-and-forth between Cairo and Jerusalem.
If it makes him "100% Egyptian" because he was born in Cairo, I know a heck of a lot of "military brats" born in Germany who need their US citizenship revoked.
2. Arafat was not his real name. It was Rahman al-Qudwa
Erm--that's not it, either. His full name was uhammad Abd al-Rahman ar-Rauf al-Qudwah al-Husayni. Long names that are shortened to new ones aren't particularly uncommon in that neck of the woods. (Or in others--you should see Francisco Franco's full name.)
3. Arafat was not a devout moslem; he has maried a christian.
The fact that he married a Christian (who converted, btw) says nothing about his devoutness. Though I tend to think, like many leaders in that part of the world, he was more of an "on-paper" Muslim.
20% of Palestinians are Christian. It's not like it's an unheard-of religion over there.
4. Arafat was not a devout moslem: he has stolen billions from his own people.
Despite what Mycroft thinks, I'm not a big Arafat fan. Never have been. But so far, the only evidence I've seen of this has been that Arafat's rich and nobody's been able to follow the money that goes to the PA. (Though I believe his personal wealth has usually been estimated in the hundreds of millions, not billions.) No investigation alleging corruption has ever been conclusive.
Of course, given that Arafat was born into a rich family, ran a fairly successful engineering firm in Kuwait (his background is in civil engineering), the fact that he's loaded isn't particularly surprising.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm sure there's corruption in the PA. Dead certain of it, in fact. But I haven't seen any conclusive evidence for the oft-repeated idea that he personally "stole billions of dollars."
And if General Pacepa's book is true, Arafat is:
5. A compromised (due to his alleged homosexual pedophilia) and controlled agent of the former USSR, a position for which he was recruited by the late A.G. Nasser, President of Egypt.
Does the fact that there's zero corraborating evidence for this mean anything to you? No records in the Kremlin. No Palestinian witnesses. Nada. Given that Arafat's been surrounded with people for most of his adult life, you'd think somebody would have said something.
As to his cause of death:
6. Nobody, not his wife, doctors, relatives or anyone is willing to state what he died from or what his clinical laboratory results were. This has lead to the speculation by the NY Post that there is one and only one disease which family and supporters of a deceased would like to suppress and that is AIDS. If he died from anything else there would, they reason, be absolutely no purpose in hiding that. And if he were truly poisoned, then it would be front page headlines by now.
If he was poisoned, it would have been released by now; the French would have picked up on it. Same deal if it was AIDS.
There is exactly the same amount of evidence for both the "AIDS" and "poison" theories. Chances are, neither are true.

