Dr. A Sheikh
Muse
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
- Messages
- 612
If you could prove your claim then you can win a fabolous prize. After all you think your claim is right.
If you could prove your claim then you can win a fabolous prize. After all you think your claim is right.
If you think Zaayrdragon is incorrect, could you describe, as succinctly as possible, what you think would actually happen in his scenario?Dr. Sheikh said:If you could prove your claim then you can win a fabolous prize. After all you think your claim is right.
The thing is, Sheikh, that if a,b,c etc are unknown, we can't know exactly how many moles are in the solution, but what we do know is the absolute upper boundary to the amount of particles.If you could prove your claim then you can win a fabolous prize. After all you think your claim is right.
Nope.You have misunderstood the process of succcession.
So what? You are diluting by 10 times or a hundred times at each stage, right?It is un-broken continous process in which dilutions are prepared in series without break.
None of that matters, even if your initial substance is reacting with your solvent. (In which case, lousy choice of solvent, guys.)From one side bottle is filled and on the other side it is evacuated. There is no break. Where the molecules are moving or what is the reaction going on, no body knows.

You never took high school level chemistry, did you Mr. Sheikh? This is elementary chemistry.
But since Mr. MAS is a fraud and a cheat, there is no prize. He is a LIAR, and should be arrested on criminal charges.
So should you.
annor,
there are so many compounds which react with homeopathic solvent (water and ethyle alcohol mixture)
If this is true alcoholic beverages couldn't be traced back to their initial components. Also during an earthquake plants would start to react with themselves and the environment, if it is true that water/alcohol + shaking causes a reaction.annor,
there are so many compounds which react with homeopathic solvent (water and ethyle alcohol mixture)
Sorry, I thought if I showed how ridiculus his argument actually was he might notice. Silly of me to think a homeopath can learn anything without being vigourously shaken themselves.Wiff, I know you are joking, but PLEASE don't give him MORE ideas to work with. He seems to have no idea of basic science, biology, or chemistry. So the irony of such comments flies right past his nose completely unnoticed!
Now you did it again! Next thing he will claim that vigorous shaking will make a difference!Sorry, I thought if I showed how ridiculus his argument actually was he might notice. Silly of me to think a homeopath can learn anything without being vigourously shaken themselves.
I'll volunteer to shake him, though I might need some help. See if he can learn some chemistry that way, explaining it doesn't seem to.Now you did it again! Next thing he will claim that vigorous shaking will make a difference!
You have misunderstood the process of succcession. It is un-broken continous process in which dilutions are prepared in series without break. From one side bottle is filled and on the other side it is evacuated. There is no break. Where the molecules are moving or what is the reaction going on, no body knows. Detail is available at NCH web site
I invite you again to name one such compound that reacts with room temperature ethyl alcohol.
acetic acid with ethyle alcohol