http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fe..._finds_major_security_flaws.html?hpid=topnews
“In the past year, investigators successfully smuggled bomb-making materials into ten high-security federal buildings, constructed bombs and walked around the buildings undetected”
Wow.
I bet they could have put more then 10 in just one building in a years time.
When?
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-nyaler122362178sep12,0,1255660.story
Heightened Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted
By Curtis L. Taylor and Sean Gardiner | STAFF WRITERS
September 12, 2001
Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.
I don't see what it maters either way. Especially in a case where guards even at federal buildings post 9/11 are found sleeping and people who just smuggled inside and constructed a bomb are walking around undetected.
Do the dogs work independently?
Hold on HI, did they smuggle your explosives into the towers over the course of a year(while the dogs were there) or in the few days when the dogs were not there?
Funny that. The penetration of building security in the official version did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.
But the buildings still fell.
Right?
In effect, yes the official story does indeed involve accessing elevator shafts and other areas not open to the public.
Fire does not respect "No Public Access" signs nor would the hundred tons of aircraft that hit the building at 450+ MPH.
tsk tsk
How many explosives were needed in your story? Reliable or not?
Excuse me? Explosives in the building is NOT any part of any debunker's 'story'? When CT's claim that explosives were used debunkers then point out what amount of explosives would be required to accomplish the task of bringing the towers down. Now go back and research the explosive equivalent of the aircraft's kintetic energy, and the multi floor fires.
Why would they need to in full view of anyone? They said they constructed the bombs and walked away undetected.
new or no?
Because there was no evidence left of a lot of things after the WTC attacks. The black boxes were never found and more then 1,000 victims were never found. And who investigated for explosives evidence and how?
So how big a device were the ones smuggled in as part of the security tests HI? How effective would a bomb fitting that physical description (Volume and mass) be in cutting the columns of the towers? Do you suppose that all bombs are created equal?
What does the fact that the black boxes were not recovered have to do with any evidence that there were explosives in the towers? Do you suppose that the FDR/CVR recorded some evidence of bombs in the towers?
Fire? So everything you previously said is needed to take down a skyscraper isn't needed now?
Actually you really seem to be attempting to make 'bombs in the buildings' a debunker idea. It isn't. We simply try to assist the Ct's who make the claim in understanding that IF there were bombs that did the deed there would have to be a lot of them in place, they would not be quiet explosives, and to do the job they would HAVE to be placed ON the columns.
The truck bomb attack 10 years prior was supposed to have been placed so as to destroy the foundation wall. They could not get a parking spot where they wanted it and ended up having all that explosive power do little more than collapse several floors of the basement. But you seem to be saying that in a few days, a few guys could walk into the towers with enough explosives to cause columns to fail but that it would not really be neccessary to place these smallish bombs all that close to , let alone on, the columns in order to have this effect. furthermore they would have been all rigged together somehow(wirelessly I suppose) such that they would go off in sequence.
