HI does not understand fire. So you lost him on the fires and he will post NIST information that confirms the fires did it and think he has posted support for his failed delusions; failed poorly defined moronic delusions. He is stuck with silent explosives as his failed conclusion. HI could earn a PhD since 911 in structures after 7 years and 9 months; but posting hearsay, lies and failed opinions is much easier.
Debunker says what?
- Thread starter Homeland Insurgency
- Start date
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Wow. All in the same few minutes. Some people need to get a grip and make up their mind already.
lol
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Yeah, that was some fine "smuggling".
Just curious, what dictionary do you use in Bizarro World?
Last edited:
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
I am beginning to suspect that you're not a troll, merely extremely dumm. One cite is referring to the requirement of a CD and the other is referring to what happened on 911. They are exclusive. (Not "same", exclusive.)
HI, I know that you aren't the sharpest tool in the shed so I will try to explain this to you as simply as possible:
IF the WTC was destroyed using explosives, it would have required tons of explosives and months of prepartion. Doing this undetected would have been impossible, and every sane person agrees.
However, the WTC wasn't destroyed using explosives. It was destroyed because large planes flew into it at high speed, releasing a large amount of kinetic energy and starting large fires. The end.
I hope this cleared up any confusion that you might have but I doubt it. You seem incapable of understanding reason.
IF the WTC was destroyed using explosives, it would have required tons of explosives and months of prepartion. Doing this undetected would have been impossible, and every sane person agrees.
However, the WTC wasn't destroyed using explosives. It was destroyed because large planes flew into it at high speed, releasing a large amount of kinetic energy and starting large fires. The end.
I hope this cleared up any confusion that you might have but I doubt it. You seem incapable of understanding reason.
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Well will everyone just listen to this debunker dribble?
They point out that the experts say tons of shaped charges would have been
required to bring down two of the tallest skyscrapers in the world.
But then turnaround and claim planes can do the same thing. Even though NIST their Gospel tells them the planes and impacts did not take down the towers. It was normal building content fire. Besides this in the case of WTC-7 there was no plane impacts or jet fuel. Just normal building content fire.
Debunker logic when painted into a corner...
normal building content fire = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
Hilarious.
They point out that the experts say tons of shaped charges would have been
required to bring down two of the tallest skyscrapers in the world.
But then turnaround and claim planes can do the same thing. Even though NIST their Gospel tells them the planes and impacts did not take down the towers. It was normal building content fire. Besides this in the case of WTC-7 there was no plane impacts or jet fuel. Just normal building content fire.
Debunker logic when painted into a corner...
normal building content fire = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
Hilarious.
Last edited:
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
No. You pointed out that some people proved that you can smuggle explosives into a building. We have repeatedly asked you to show that that ploy would work on the thousands and thousands of charges. You have not done that.
In absence of you proving that thousands of charges were actually smuggled into the towers and planted and primed, we then show you Occam's Razor. That it was, as that little guy on Fantasy Island used to say, "The Plane, Boss! The Plane!"
Pathetic. You have been taken out behind the woodshed and had the tar whupped out of you, and your defense is "Nyah nyah, but you didn't break my leg!"
no he is not dumb...just trolling. The one thing I will give HI credit for, is he behaves like a GRADE "A" TROLL.
TAM
Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
Amazing. Look at this twoofer logic!
They seem to think that a person could smuggle a small amount of explosives into a building, and that means its proof that the buildings were brought down by controlled Demolition!
They fail to note that there could in fact be multiple ways to bring down a building. There is a rather messy and dangerous way: Fly a fully fueled airliner at cruising speed into it! The resultant damage and fires weakened the struture enough that it would collapse! Alas, this is messy, spreading fire and debris over a wide area.
You could even bring it down via explosives! You could place demo charges onto exposed beams, run a great deal wire and set them up to collapse. Of course, this means there would be obvious evidence of explosives. Like the sound of multiple charges going off, perhaps even flashes! Unfortunately for the twoofers, neither were evidence on 9/11.
It seems that some twoofers think that it is an either/or scenario. It is not. With a great deal of evidence showing an aircraft flying into a building, and extensive fires, we conclude that this was the cause of the unfortunate events that fateful day.
Of course, in twoofer land, the fact that some people managed to smuggle small amounts of bomb components into federal buildings is absolute proof that the Twin Towers were brought down by.. an unknown amount of secret silent explosives.
Hilarious!
Yes, almost 4 tons. Very close to the building; I would call it just like inside, next to, right next to it so it would kill the kids in day care.
So you have a Ryder truck on the 78th floor with 4000 pounds of fertilizer and fuel, and racing fuel as a kicker; apologize for McVeigh now because 19 murderers at not enough?
It was almost in the building.
See the car, essentially in the building and the blast was able to get up under the floors. See how McVeigh used the nicest people on earth to blow them up. How pathetic can you get making up lies to satisfy your failed moronic delusions?
Is there a truck ramp to the 78 floor? Why did we not hear a bomb go off on 911? Do you want me to tell you how far away they heard the OKC bomb from nut case McVeigh who was dumb enough to be a truther?
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/kaboom/loizeaux.html
NOVA: I understand that you try to use the smallest amount of explosives possible.
SL: Right.
NOVA: Can you explain why?
SL: Well, the explosives are really just the catalyst. Largely what we use is gravity. And we're dealing with Class A explosives that are embedded into concrete—and that concrete flies. So, let's say your explosive is 17,000 feet per second—you've got a piece of concrete moving at that speed when you remove it from the structure. So we try to use the minimal amount to keep down the fly of debris for a safe operation. Other than that, it comes down to cost effectiveness. You know, the more holes you have to drill, it's more labor, more time, and it's more expensive. So, obviously, the smallest amount of work is best.
KABOOM!
lol
NOVA: I understand that you try to use the smallest amount of explosives possible.
SL: Right.
NOVA: Can you explain why?
SL: Well, the explosives are really just the catalyst. Largely what we use is gravity. And we're dealing with Class A explosives that are embedded into concrete—and that concrete flies. So, let's say your explosive is 17,000 feet per second—you've got a piece of concrete moving at that speed when you remove it from the structure. So we try to use the minimal amount to keep down the fly of debris for a safe operation. Other than that, it comes down to cost effectiveness. You know, the more holes you have to drill, it's more labor, more time, and it's more expensive. So, obviously, the smallest amount of work is best.
KABOOM!
lol
no he is not dumb...just trolling. The one thing I will give HI credit for, is he behaves like a GRADE "A" TROLL.
TAM
Perhaps he is dumb and trolling?
Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
In Twoofer land, they smuggled it in, with the explosives in their pockets!
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
No there was a freight elevator that could bring up things like dumpsters. There was also out of service elevators in the core and vacant floors.
That's funny. What do the Loizeauxs think about your insane fantasy?
Oh, and just because they use the smallest amount neccesary doesn't mean that the smallest amount neccesary isn't a large amount, genuis.
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Debunker logic when painted into a corner...
normal building content fire = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
normal building content fire = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Debunker logic...
Smoking in bed = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
lol
Smoking in bed = tons of shaped charges strategically place over months on every floor attached to building supports.
lol
YES!