Those of us who have been arguing this crap for 4 or more years find it hard to believe that anyone, 9 years after the event, is just now being exposed to the CTs of 9/11.
Those of us....find it hard to yet again, for the umpteenth time, explain in detail the reasons that make the CTs false.
We were working on a "Best Threads" project, but Mark Roberts got busy with real life, and the project took a derail. I am contemplating taking the project up myself, but for now, THE SEARCH FUNCTION is your best friend.
TAM
For the record I would love to see a Best Threads section. I'm surprised that you find it hard to believe that anyone is just now becoming exposed to CT theories. I think I am like most people. While yes I had heard that there were some CT theories about 911 I paid no attention to them as it was pretty obvious to me what caused the buildings to collapse. I only became interested after reading a news article that made fun of possibly our next prime minister (in Canada) because he said Al-Qaeda was responsible for 911. That pissed me off.
Of course I quickly found that the questions had been answered. Having said that sometimes I find myself wading through some realllly long threads here.