Debate (not debase) a Truther

Is it a real quote? You have no evidence only a single source from a known liar and crazy person like Maxwell. Yet you still believe it? Good job truther.

Guess you didn't follow the link. Good job skeptic.
 
That quote has 4 or 5 different ellipses in it, and for some reason it only appears on conspiracy-type websites. Why not go find the original and post it here?
 
Guess you didn't follow the link. Good job skeptic.

That quote, according to the source, was from a closed door meeting. How do you get a quote from a closed door meeting unless you were at that meeting? So once again, who is the source of the quote? Or do you care?
 
Guess you didn't follow the link. Good job skeptic.

I guess you forgot what primary sources were, good job truther. :rolleyes:

You apparently think quote mining is evidence. Oh and btw it seems that this quote we are talking about on this thread is attributed to a completely different place in this link you just gave, now its at a Bilderberg meeting whereas Maxwell claimed it was from a Trilateral Commission meeting. Funny that. The dates are also wrong, Maxwell says it was in 1991, whereas this says 1995. Hmm!

Can you or can you not show that this quote is accurate?

And btw:

Couldn't Rockefeller take action if it wasn't?

Of course not, Creationists have been misquoting scientists for decades.
 
Last edited:
Oh, you were being sarcastic but I was being serious....

Maybe one day Maxwell will email me....for the time being, keep hiding your head in the sand; its easier that way...
 
Oh, you were being sarcastic but I was being serious....

Maybe one day Maxwell will email me....for the time being, keep hiding your head in the sand; its easier that way...

lol, how can I hide from something you won't provide any evidence for?

So far you have provided a quote from two sources that contradict each other from people who regularly MAKE UP QUOTES and who quote people OUT OF CONTEXT.

All you have is an unverified quote that is for all intents and purposes unsourced. Why do you believe it anyway? Because it agrees with your faith.
 
Dear Nice Guy,

It looks like you can do with some help here. Unlike you I have read the NIST reports and I am sad enough to have a hard copy at home, so maybe I can help you with all these tough questions about the philosophy of truth and honesty.

Which flavor of truth do you believe in.? Is your truth energy weapons, no planes, missiles, or conventional airplane truth? I am the latter and a kind of hard-core ae911truth guy. So I take the lead from Mr Gage and my truth consists of the noiseless fireproof C4 explosives taking down WTC 1 and 2, with the silent thermite taking down WTC7. But I can't help wonder why they let so many people escape.... wouldn't the case for war be better with more killed?

Anyway I am sure that all the truth will be revealed when we have our investigation, as long as we have subpeona power.

I don't mind the brazen fund-raising or the inconsistencies in our truth, or the fact that sometimes we need to sculpt the truth or quote mine to make our point. The important thing is to win after-all.

I think the complete lack of support from the industry ( we have two professional structural engineers from the whole of NY State, where there are about 10,000) just makes us cute and slightly hopeless, and I have always enjoyed supporting a lost cause, don't you?

Mr Gage's job is at stake here, so we will not give up easily.
 
Last edited:
Dear Nice Guy,

It looks like you can do with some help here. Unlike you I have read the NIST reports and I am sad enough to have a hard copy at home, so maybe I can help you with all these tough questions about the philosophy of truth and honesty.

Which flavor of truth do you believe in.? Is your truth energy weapons, no planes, missiles, or conventional airplane truth? I am the latter and a kind of hard-core ae911truth guy. So I take the lead from Mr Gage and my truth consists of the noiseless fireproof C4 explosives taking down WTC 1 and 2, with the silent thermite taking down WTC7. But I can't help wonder why they let so many people escape.... wouldn't the case for war be better with more killed?

Anyway I am sure that all the truth will be revealed when we have our investigation, as long as we have subpeona power.

I don't mind the brazen fund-raising or the inconsistencies in our truth, or the fact that sometimes we need to sculpt the truth or quote mine to make our point. The important thing is to win after-all.

I think the complete lack of support from the industry ( we have two professional structural engineers from the whole of NY State, where there are about 10,000) just makes us cute and slightly hopeless, and I have always enjoyed supporting a lost cause, don't you?

Mr Gage's job is at stake here, so we will not give up easily.

tl;dr
 
...my truth consists of the noiseless fireproof C4 explosives taking down WTC 1 and 2, with the silent thermite taking down WTC7...
A hush-a-boomer, eh? Goodness.

Anyway I am sure that all the truth will be revealed when we have our investigation, as long as we have subpeona power.
Which will be exactly...never.

Oh, and the truth has been revealed. That people with their warped agendas choose to ignore it is sad.

I don't mind the brazen fund-raising or the inconsistencies in our truth, or the fact that sometimes we need to sculpt the truth or quote mine to make our point.
Comedy gold.

The important thing is to win after-all.
See: reason for sadness, above.
 

Back
Top Bottom