• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Daily Show 9/11 Truth Reference

That's the character of debunkers. They don't care about actual evidence, they just want to believe the government story.

I saw that quote and actually had to laugh. Especially since before this the poster pulled out the "no evidence of molten steel" argument, claiming this as the "government story" even though most of us know this is not the truth.

Also, claiming that the removal of the debris is a violation of the law. wtf? Now, I'm not American, but which laws? They also claim that "FEMA BPAT members had to chase trucks to salvage yards and get samples there to conduct their investigation." Nice choice of words there by our poor misinformed friend.

Does anyone have any background Salem News article listed? First time I've seen it.

and just start on the right side of the main page, and see the nice, lengthy list of supporting evidence for demolitions, as listed and as suported by over 1300 working architects and civil engineers....

I guess what I'll be doing this evening: looking at their "evidence" on ae911truth. I'll also be doing a background look into Neils Harritt and the supposed "peer-reviewed paper" that "shows trace evidence of undetonated, high-tech explosive in all of the dust samples"

By the way, is it just me or is one of the Truther's on the Daily Show forum an administrator? The one that says WTC7 should have collapsed since a plane didn't hit it.
 
Last edited:
By the way, is it just me or is one of the Truther's on the Daily Show forum an administrator? The one that says WTC7 should have collapsed since a plane didn't hit it.

I'm pretty sure that's just one of the rankings you get at the forum based on how many posts you've made. I'm sure all of his are pure gold. ;)
 

Back
Top Bottom