Cyborgs?

[HeyLeroy]

And secretive?

Victoria secretive.

And I can't believe I blew my 4,000th post on that.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yeah it makes perfect sense they go public with stuff like this as soon as they start working on it.

right?

Man, I know you voted for yourself in the Stundies, but you and this guy are soul brothers!

redufo
"Yes, DARPA does have voice changing software that can mimic you like the Termintor did. You think that movies been around since 1984 and DARPA is only copying the HK and T-800 for use in Iraq but skipped over the voice changing stuff? Google it."

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Maybe but I don't think they just figured out how to implant a computer chip in a creature when it's still a pupa, in the cocoon, and control the moth's entire nervous system remotely just a couple months ago. Just a hunch. That and one of the articles was from a year ago.

Or maybe it is just a bunch of bull for our enemies to read about. UBL will now have to exterminate the entire cave before his next taping. If we can’t catch him maybe we can annoy the hell out of him.

read the later ones and you're going to realize that they haven't perfected anything yet

 

[defaultdotxbe]

But just a few years later they are going public with remote control live rats and sharks. Is this easier in your mind? Whatever works for you and your story.

actually it may well be easier, according to the article you linked if they want the shark to turn they make it think it smells something, so it turns on its own, its a high tech carrot on a stick

now look at it this way, if its so much harder to control a living creature (one that can to an extent think for itself and you just have to give suggestions) why are we seeing cyborg moths before moth-sized UAVs?

 

[LastChild]

Man, I know you voted for yourself in the Stundies, but you and this guy are soul brothers!

redufo
"Yes, DARPA does have voice changing software that can mimic you like the Termintor did. You think that movies been around since 1984 and DARPA is only copying the HK and T-800 for use in Iraq but skipped over the voice changing stuff? Google it."

Whaaaa?

Will Darpa be combining that technology with the moth technology so that the Great Satan Dubya can scare the crap out of the terrorist by talking through the moth?

"I see you err Bin Laden you terrist. I'm gonna getcha! Heee Heee.. Haww.. look I'm on the wall of the cave over here! Nope now I'm over here! Heee Hee erre I fooled you once and now I fooled ya again hee haw haw. look at me you evil doer I'm a little bug! Ya give up yet? I couldn't smoke ya outta yer hole so I'm gonna bug ya out. BOO!"

 

[gtc]

Yes. Yes he will.

 

[LastChild]

actually it may well be easier, according to the article you linked if they want the shark to turn they make it think it smells something, so it turns on its own, its a high tech carrot on a stick

So the fact that they wouldn't need to get the plane to think it smelled anything to get it to turn would be harder?

now look at it this way, if its so much harder to control a living creature (one that can to an extent think for itself and you just have to give suggestions) why are we seeing cyborg moths before moth-sized UAVs?

I'm sure they probably could make a fully mechanical one if they wanted but would it be as covert as something living? Would it look like the real thing up close? If the enemy caught one of these live ones would they even know it had anything in it?

 

[Corsair 115]

Micro air vehicles have been around for a couple of years. The problem with such vehicles is twofold: 1) air molecules are much larger in proportion to the vehicle's size than with regular aerial vehicles, which makes controlling the micro vehicles an issue, and 2) miniaturizing components such as cameras, transmitters, and power sources is a significant challenge.

 

[Thunder]

how is this a conspiracy?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

So the fact that they wouldn't need to get the plane to think it smelled anything to get it to turn would be harder?

the fact that they have to tell the plane how to turn makes it harder, they dont need to tell a shark how to turn, it knows how to turn, it knows how to swim, it knows how to do everything a shark needs to do, they just need to convince the shark to turn, like i said, a carrot on a stick

 

[Corsair 115]

...they just need to convince the shark to turn, like i said, a carrot on a stick

I'd suggest that a piece of tuna on a stick would be more effective than a carrot in getting a shark to turn...

 

[gtc]

how is this a conspiracy?

The fact that they would one day like to be able to control moths in this way is clear proof (clear proof I say) that they were able to control aeroplanes in a completely different way back in 2001.

This could lead to the unravelling of the entire NWO!!!!!!1111!!!!!eleventy!!!!!1111

 

[LastChild]

the fact that they have to tell the plane how to turn makes it harder, they dont need to tell a shark how to turn, it knows how to turn, it knows how to swim, it knows how to do everything a shark needs to do, they just need to convince the shark to turn, like i said, a carrot on a stick

They have been working on remote control planes for years.

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890006539_1989006539.pdf


http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01d.html

Global Hawk Makes Historic First Unmanned Flight To Australia
Adelaide - April 24, 2001
The United States’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Global Hawk made international aviation history Monday when it completed the first non-stop flight across the Pacific Ocean by an autonomous aircraft, flying from Edwards Air Force Base on the west coast of the U.S. to RAAF Base Edinburgh, South Australia.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

They have been working on remote control planes for years.

and each time they build a new one it requires a whole new program to fly it properly, not moths though, they already know how to fly

 

[LastChild]

There is no way that cyborg technology is a step backwards from steering a plane by remote control. That's idiotic. Boeing was even given a record fine for installing the same kind of chip in planes that is used in missiles and then selling some of those planes to China.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002918295_boeing08.html

According to the State Department charges, between 2000 and 2003 Boeing shipped overseas 94 commercial jets with the QRS-11 gyrochip embedded in the flight boxes, including 19 to China. Export of listed defense items to China is specifically proscribed.

The State Department had determined in 1993 that the chip, used in the guidance system of the Maverick missile, "has significant military utility." That put the devices on a list of products that require a license for foreign sales.

 

[gumboot]

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

There is no way that cyborg technology is a step backwards from steering a plane by remote control. That's idiotic.

agreed, but i think calling this "cyborg technology" is quite a bit of a overstatement

the rest of your post doesnt appear to be relevent to the topic at all

 

[LastChild]

agreed, but i think calling this "cyborg technology" is quite a bit of a overstatement

the rest of your post doesnt appear to be relevent to the topic at all

It's a missile guidance system technology from 1993 that was being installed in Boeings pre-911. What's not relevant about it? The technology was there.

 

[HyJinX]

Moron

 

[LashL]

Can this please be moved to a more appropriate subforum since there appears to be no "conspiracy theory" elucidated in the OP or its following posts?


(Humour, perhaps, since we do not currently have a subforum dedicated to Lunatics Anonymous?)