Creepy

dirtywick said:
You know how the added ginormous to the dictionary as a real word a few weeks back? They need one for ignorant and offensive.

Because, you know, I could really use that word about now.

As an aside, if you're wondering why no one takes your petty little cash cow "truth" movement seriously, it's statements like this. It's pretty disgusting.
Click to expand...

Ignoffensive?
 
Imagine if he had said it was 19 hijackers from Arab countries

The truthers would have been all over it saying that he knew too quickly and knew too much

Some quite disgusting insults thrown out as well, it never fails to amaze me how low these people will stoop
 
funk de fino said:
Imagine if he had said it was 19 hijackers from Arab countries

The truthers would have been all over it saying that he knew too quickly and knew too much

Some quite disgusting insults thrown out as well, it never fails to amaze me how low these people will stoop
Click to expand...

They don't really need to stoop all that much being most of them are already bottom-feeders.
 
OldSchool said:
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".
Click to expand...

So it's creepy that he couldn't or didn't want to answer the question that very night ?

Lots of things must be creepy for you.
 
Besides the obvious "Fog of War"

Being asked if we're sure it was carried out by foreigners does not mean she asked if it was carried out from within the U.S. government. There's a fallacy in debates for that. I can't recall it off the top of my head... Projection maybe?

Besides... The previous terror attack on the U.S. was committed by Tim McVeigh, and there were reports at the time of a muslim or two detained while "fleeing" the country. So asking ON THE NIGHT IT HAPPENED whether or not it could have been U.S. citizens is not that out of the ordinary... Nor does it prove anything.

What sickens me is that on the night of 9/11, John Edwards probably spent about 20 minutes putting on his makeup and getting his hair just right for this interview.

He could have at least use the same vaseline filter barbara gets to smooth himself out.
 
OldSchool said:
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".
Click to expand...

What answer could he have given that you would have accepted as evidence that 9/11 was NOT an inside job?
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Name ONE thing that you can't do anymore under the law that you could do prior to 9/11.
Click to expand...

Um, you can't expect not to be wiretapped when calling your buddies in Iraq and telling them that you're planning to bomb a mall in the U.S. Darn corrupt U.S. government - getting in the way of suicide bombers with Iraqi ties! Next thing you know, they'll be listening in on me telling my wife what to get from the grocery store! And then Hitler will come out of hiding and take over the U.S. presidency!

I've heard that smoking lots of weed makes you paranoid.
 
OldSchool said:
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".

I wonder if this interview is going to be brought up during a debate, and whether or not all candidates are going to have to answer the questions surrounding 911.
Click to expand...


I think someone is setting up that the Democrats were in on it too so the 9/11 CT crap can continue if the GOP loses power in 2008.
I would love for a CT'er to get a 9/11 CTer to get his question selected for one of these Youtube debates. (I think it is a lousy debate format,but that is another question). Watch every candidate fall over themselves do distance themselves from that crap.
And my Contempt for Old School increases with his comments on the US Military.He is starting to sound like a aging Sixties Radical trying to relive the GLory Days.
 
Last edited:
VespaGuy said:
What answer could he have given that you would have accepted as evidence that 9/11 was NOT an inside job?
Click to expand...

Considering his position, at the time, as an active member of the CIA, his response was surprising. Normally I'd expect him too have closed the possibility of internal cause. He seemed nervous almost as much as George seems every time he's in front of a Camera. He most likely didn't have much knowledge too his credit. His lack of knowledge is too be expected considering the way information flows within the CIA. The cause or plot surrounding 911 is a mystery and nothing he'd said would have changed this simple fact. Considering the amount of information withheld from the FEMA and NIST reports 911 is still a mystery.


I did actually spend two years writing reports on the institution which is the CIA. I've have spent hours inside government documents section of my College Library. The actions the CIA took during the late 1970's and early 1980's quite disturbing. There is many declassified documents which even the most skeptical would find disturbing. Most people haven't taken the time too page through such documents though. Even though I find Ronald Reagan too be a great American President, he should have been Impeached. This would be an entirely different post which would go on for hours. When I first started research into the CIA it wasn't based upon Conspiracy. I found the CIA to be mysterious and even wanted to be an agent some day. Conspiracy revealed itself without much effort simply reading old government documents. Even though, by law, CIA agents aren't allowed too conduct operations within the United States, the law is broken on a regular basis. The secrecy and absolute freedom, of any CIA member, makes corruption very simple compared too any Political Institution. I met a retired NSA agent once. There's one thing he said which sticks in my mind till this day. " Any political official who finds himself in hot water doesn't find himself there without the aid of an intelligence. What he's accused of is normally fabricated and has nothing to do with the reason his career is being destroyed."

What I found creepy about John Edwards statement is he didn't respond to close the door to possible conspiracy. Actually his response leads me to believe he wasn't involved if there is a 911 conspiracy. He appeared too be an average person who didn't have enough information to answer Barbara's questions.

To answer your question directly. There isn't anything he could of said which would have closed my mind to possibly conspiracy. The extensive research I've done on the institution which is the Central Intelligence Agency makes conspiracy seem very simple. As I've stated before supplying proof of such an event is many years away. Government documents can remain classified for up to 25 years. If you go to a Government Documents Library you'll also find many areas of documents have been covered by black magic marker. The Truth Movement and Debunkers, respectively, may never have proof of anything.
 
OldSchool said:
There isn't anything he could of said which would have closed my mind to possibly conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Everything is proof to a CTist.

When you can twist "yes", "no", and "no comment" to all mean "yes", you prove how badly you want your fairy-tale to be true.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
and this is evidence of an inside job how?
Click to expand...

I did actually spend two years writing reports on the institution which is the CIA. I've have spent hours inside government documents section of my College Library. The actions the CIA took during the late 1970's and early 1980's quite disturbing. There is many declassified documents which even the most skeptical would find disturbing. Most people haven't taken the time too page through such documents though. Even though I find Ronald Reagan too be a great American President, he should have been Impeached. This would be an entirely different post which would go on for hours. When I first started research into the CIA it wasn't based upon Conspiracy. I found the CIA to be mysterious and even wanted to be an agent some day. Conspiracy revealed itself without much effort simply reading old government documents. Even though, by law, CIA agents aren't allowed too conduct operations within the United States, the law is broken on a regular basis. The secrecy and absolute freedom, of any CIA member, makes corruption very simple compared too any Political Institution. I met a retired NSA agent once. There's one thing he said which sticks in my mind till this day. " Any political official who finds himself in hot water doesn't find himself there without the aid of an intelligence. What he's accused of is normally fabricated and has nothing to do with the reason his career is being destroyed."
 
defaultdotxbe said:
and this is evidence of an inside job how?
Click to expand...

To answer your question directly. There isn't anything he could of said which would have closed my mind to possibly conspiracy. The extensive research I've done on the institution which is the Central Intelligence Agency makes conspiracy seem very simple. As I've stated before supplying proof of such an event is many years away. Government documents can remain classified for up to 25 years. If you go to a Government Documents Library you'll also find many areas of documents have been covered by black magic marker. The Truth Movement and Debunkers, respectively, may never have proof of anything.
 
OldSchool said:
I did actually spend two years writing reports on the institution which is the CIA. I've have spent hours inside government documents section of my College Library. The actions the CIA took during the late 1970's and early 1980's quite disturbing. There is many declassified documents which even the most skeptical would find disturbing. Most people haven't taken the time too page through such documents though. Even though I find Ronald Reagan too be a great American President, he should have been Impeached. This would be an entirely different post which would go on for hours. When I first started research into the CIA it wasn't based upon Conspiracy. I found the CIA to be mysterious and even wanted to be an agent some day. Conspiracy revealed itself without much effort simply reading old government documents. Even though, by law, CIA agents aren't allowed too conduct operations within the United States, the law is broken on a regular basis. The secrecy and absolute freedom, of any CIA member, makes corruption very simple compared too any Political Institution. I met a retired NSA agent once. There's one thing he said which sticks in my mind till this day. " Any political official who finds himself in hot water doesn't find himself there without the aid of an intelligence. What he's accused of is normally fabricated and has nothing to do with the reason his career is being destroyed."
Click to expand...
way to completely not answer my question

how is john edwards inability to answer barbaras question evidence of an inside job?

ETA: so your answer is that everything is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job because 9/11 was an inside job?
 
OldSchool said:
I did actually spend two years writing reports on the institution which is the CIA. I've have spent hours inside government documents section of my College Library. The actions the CIA took during the late 1970's and early 1980's quite disturbing. There is many declassified documents which even the most skeptical would find disturbing. Most people haven't taken the time too page through such documents though. Even though I find Ronald Reagan too be a great American President, he should have been Impeached. This would be an entirely different post which would go on for hours. When I first started research into the CIA it wasn't based upon Conspiracy. I found the CIA to be mysterious and even wanted to be an agent some day. Conspiracy revealed itself without much effort simply reading old government documents. Even though, by law, CIA agents aren't allowed too conduct operations within the United States, the law is broken on a regular basis. The secrecy and absolute freedom, of any CIA member, makes corruption very simple compared too any Political Institution. I met a retired NSA agent once. There's one thing he said which sticks in my mind till this day. " Any political official who finds himself in hot water doesn't find himself there without the aid of an intelligence. What he's accused of is normally fabricated and has nothing to do with the reason his career is being destroyed."
Click to expand...

Uh-huh...

and this is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, how?
 
OldSchool said:
Actually his response leads me to believe he wasn't involved if there is a 911 conspiracy. He appeared too be an average person who didn't have enough information to answer Barbara's questions.
Click to expand...
That's really the crux of the matter, and since we all agree, what was your point in starting this thread?
 
Oh, and OldSchool, you apparently are working with a very flawed set of assumptions about the politics of the regulars on this forum. Your posts seem to assume that we're typically supportive of the US government, its policies and actions. That's not the case for most of us.
 
Wait, did he just say Senator Edwards was an ACTIVE CIA agent at the time of 9/11?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom