Creepy

Unless you're brain dead, 9/11 has been a political issue since September 12th, 2001.

As for your video, I now dislike Senator Edwards slightly less than I did ten minutes ago.
 
The question I have, after watching that video, is how this Aidan person can put a "production" slug on a snippet of an interview done on ABC?
 
Did the guy who posted this really have to make such a dramatic introduction to it? "An Aidan Monaghan Production". His production was to post a video clip that isn't his and do nothing with it?

Edit (I'm saying edit instead of ETA because I don't know what ETA stands for, other than "Estimated Time of Arrival"): I guess Yaters beat me to the punch on that one.
 
chippy said:
Did the guy who posted this really have to make such a dramatic introduction to it? "An Aidan Monaghan Production". His production was to post a video clip that isn't his and do nothing with it?
Click to expand...

Yes, exactly.

Also, I like how the description uses "from within", and the video uses "foreign" and "domestic".

ETA: Edited To Add, it's worth repeating, Chippy.
 
Looking at the video again, it's pretty obvious what is going on here.

This video was filmed on the very night of 9/11. Oldschool is playing the typical troofer game of taking micro-snippets from the first hours/days after the attacks and quoting them as if they were gospel.

Remember that the concept of "fog-of-war" does not exist in the troofers parallel universe. In their world, all information gets transmitted perfectly the first time.
 
interesting, so, assuming 9/11 was an inside job, are we to believe that anyone with knowledge of it would be wholly incapable of lying and saying "No, it most certainly was not, Barbara"

also, +1 to the ranks of the nWo, guess we gotta start cutting Edwards checks too now
 
chippy said:
Did the guy who posted this really have to make such a dramatic introduction to it? "An Aidan Monaghan Production". His production was to post a video clip that isn't his and do nothing with it?

Edit (I'm saying edit instead of ETA because I don't know what ETA stands for, other than "Estimated Time of Arrival"): I guess Yaters beat me to the punch on that one.
Click to expand...

ETA = Edited To Add

As for the "production" credit, it's nothing new around here for truthers. Ace Baker (Truthseeker1234) slapped his anarchy symbol and a tm or copyrite symbol (I forget which) on a looping gif of flight 175 hitting the south tower. That one really pissed me off.
 
Alareth said:
ETA = Edited To Add

As for the "production" credit, it's nothing new around here for truthers. Ace Baker (Truthseeker1234) slapped his anarchy symbol and a tm or copyrite symbol (I forget which) on a looping gif of flight 175 hitting the south tower. That one really pissed me off.
Click to expand...

Don't get me started on that one. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
The CREEPY thing is, what a Twoofer see's, when they watch this! Nothing near, what sane people see. Same old tune, Wooooooooo...
 
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".

I wonder if this interview is going to be brought up during a debate, and whether or not all candidates are going to have to answer the questions surrounding 911.
 
Well, he’d just been speaking to the head of the CIA on the night of the attacks. He was probably not at liberty to answer the question.
 
Last edited:
OldSchool said:
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".

I wonder if this interview is going to be brought up during a debate, and whether or not all candidates are going to have to answer the questions surrounding 911.
Click to expand...


He said he couldn't answer a question on national intelligence. Perhaps this 9month old senator just didn't want to divulge any national secrets and didn't want to say for sure one way or the other because they weren't sure who did it 8 hours after the attack?

How does him not answering the question have anything to do with 9/11?
 
creepy how dumb you have to be to think this is a topic that warrents further study

OldSchool said:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2837798712919710673&hl=en

Very surprised too see such an interview. I wonder if 911's really going too become a campaign issue.
Click to expand...
This could only mean something to an idiot in the truth movement.

Creepy is how dumb the story would have to be to tie this to a CT about 9/11. Which super smart truther has an dumb idea what this means? Remember this is on 9/11 before the FBI has finished the first 12 hours of putting anything together. I think I had a better handle of who did it than Edwards could ever do. With idiots like Tim McVeigh running around maybe Edwards is too dumb to understand most home grown terrorist do plan on their own deaths when they kill others.
 
OldSchool said:
The interview did take place on the night of 911. He's on the intelligence committee and its extremely creepy he dodged the question, " Are we sure its Foreigners".

I wonder if this interview is going to be brought up during a debate, and whether or not all candidates are going to have to answer the questions surrounding 911.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom