Could WTC 7 have been pulled?

[PhantomWolf]

Wrong again. If the firemen would have still been in the building when the call was made then Chief Nigro would have been told by the fire commander to pull the firemen out.

His statement stands as evidence that the firemen were out of the buidling before the call to Silverstein.

You are aware that a Chief outranks a Commander and so wouldn't be being told what to do by him? You assumptions are nothing but air. You can't even get the quote fropm Silverstein right and figure out who did what and said what. You need to go and do another 7 years of research because up to now your skills are extremely lacking.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Even more evidence the firemen were pulled out BEFORE the phone call.

That places the evacuation at about 2:20pm. Silverstein says the phone call took place during the afternoon. Does the morning last till 2:21 where you come from?

Dave

 

[pomeroo]

...and then they watched the building collapse. You conveniently left that part out.

And why on earth is that "convenient"? How many times have I posted Silverstein's entire quote? You, who have been utterly humiliated repeatedly in this nonsensical faux-controversy, are well aware that I have spent considerable time exposing the attempted deception by you conspiracy liars. Seriously, have you lost your mind? The building DID collapse, as most of us know. You can't possibly dream that you have a point to make here. This topic completely destroyed your credibility.

 

[pomeroo]

Yes, i know. It was the incident commad (IC) that made the decision to bring down the building.

Silverstein had not authority, specailly over pulling the firemen.

Are you capable of comprehending anything I've posted? Silverstein's conversation with the fire chief had nothing to do with demolition. Can you grasp that? Neither side talks about demolition. Say it ten times until the point sinks in. The building was not demolished. There is zero evidence of explosives. I understand that your evil movement requires its slaves to make fools of themselves, but you have a choice. Really.

Do you get the idea that YOU DO NOT KNOW WHEN THE FDNY CONTACTED SILVERSTEIN? You know only that the call was made in the afternoon. That is all you know. YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG AFTER THE CALL THE BUILDING COLLAPSED.

 

[pomeroo]

Gee, one thing you sure do not understand is how to research and get information from professionals.

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
It is known that structural steel begins to soften around 425°C and loses about half of its strength at 650°C.4 This is why steel is stress relieved in this temperature range. But even a 50% loss of strength is still insufficient, by itself, to explain the WTC collapse. It was noted above that the wind load controlled the design allowables. The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650°C fire.

NIST published ten thousand pages on the collapses of the towers. You have read none of that material, as you are manifestly incapable of reading technical material. But doesn't it raise a red flag that you, a person with no background whatever in science or engineering, are professing to lecture physicists, metallurgists, engineers, and fire safety experts on the properties of steel? What do you know that the serious researchers don't? (Don't worry--no conspiracy liar has ever attempted to answer that question.)

 

[I Ratant]

(Ultima1)You are aware ...

.
An overly optimistic assumption.
His total lack of awareness would be painful were it not so pathetic.