dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
I think people with "food intolerances" back then used to say that certain foods "don't agree with me" and just get on with it.
True.
I think people with "food intolerances" back then used to say that certain foods "don't agree with me" and just get on with it.
Gluten intolerant did not seem to exist when I was young. What used to happen to the people who were gluten intolerant?
He stated this here:
Why he even asks is unclear though. Why is he 'trying to know'? In what way is educating Kumar meaningful? Is anybody's guess ...
Gluten intolerant did not seem to exist when I was young. What used to happen to the people who were gluten intolerant?
If you look back at some of his older threads, you will find that "excess stomach acid" is a particular concern of his, usually in relation to type 2 diabetes.
An interesting link, The Don.
" Asian men with a waist size of 35 inches (90cm) or over have a higher risk, as do white or black men with a waist size of 37 inches (94cm) or over.
Reducing your body weight by about 5% and exercising regularly could reduce your risk of getting diabetes by more than 50%."
"Reducing your body weight by about 5% and exercising regularly could reduce your risk of getting diabetes by more than 50%."
You're welcome...
Thanks for clearing that up, Daylightstar.
This sort of thing has been suggested to Kumar in many of his threads about diabetes.
It is quite common feeling. But I do not concern myself from commons.
I am bothered about, how it happen? Is it reducing energy load or reducing lazyness or reducing immune load?
Eating less, exercising more, and losing weight as a result, is mass existing in well distributedpeopledoctors since long as not only a preventative measure but as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes, at least in the early stages.
The study randomly assigned 5,145 overweight or obese people with Type 2 diabetes to either a rigorous diet and exercise regimen or to sessions in which they got general health information. The diet involved 1,200 to 1,500 calories a day for those weighing less than 250 pounds and 1,500 to 1,800 calories a day for those weighing more. The exercise program was at least 175 minutes a week of moderate exercise.
But 11 years after the study began, researchers concluded it was futile to continue — the two groups had nearly identical rates of heart attacks, strokes and cardiovascular deaths.
“That may be the choice we are highlighting,” Dr. Nathan said. “You can take more medications — and more, I should say, expensive medications — or you can chose a lifestyle intervention and use fewer drugs and come to the same cardiovascular disease risk.”
“That may be the choice we are highlighting,” Dr. Nathan said. “You can take more medications — and more, I should say, expensive medications — or you can chose a lifestyle intervention and use fewer drugs and come to the same cardiovascular disease risk.”
A study which didn't attempt to track whether they still had Type 2 Diabetes, instead it was looking at heart attack and stroke.
It also came up with an interesting conclusion, that although the two groups had the same rate of heart attack and stroke, the group that lost weight used less medication:
Oh, myyy[/takei]Which link said whether or not you are gluten intolerant?
Hint: it would need to say something like either "Kumar is gluten intolerant" or "Kumar is not gluten intolerant". And please don't try to start anther argument by Googlefight.
It is quite common feeling. But I do not concern myself from commons.
I am bothered about, how it happen? Is it reducing energy load or reducing lazyness or reducing immune load?
An excuse not to lose weight?
In view of non-absoloutism(NOT A&F) and of Anekantvad, anyone can say in any manner, as not absolute but still can be partly correct and aurgue accordingly. But full reality lie in A&F.