Cooking?

[dafydd]

Do not insist on your own approach that many alternative systems do/can not work.

What? That makes no sense. Do not, do/can, what on earth do you mean?

 

[Daylightstar]

Do not insist on your own approach that many alternative systems do/can not work.

What's this Kumar, are you now displaying religious hypocrisy?

E.T.A.:

...
You don't really, truly accept those principles as it seems they were intended. You mangle and abuse them in an attempt to let them support your entirely unsupportable beliefs and ideas.
Again, your acting entirely in contravention of those principles you presented.

It's called being deceitful, Kumar.

 

[pakeha]

If we take that life & death is dependant on nature/God and they are only entitled to effect it for keeping the nature in balance, then all our acts done by using our consious mind can be odd BUT if we consider that pruning/thining/weeding etc. done with our consious act is also right to kep nature in balance then both these can be treated as acts done for nature's progess, nature's maintainance and nature's balance....and so may not be an interferance in nature.

Keep nature in balance?
What does that have to do with cooking?

It's natural becase it has "inharent sense of right & wrongW, and it has "inharent sense of right & wrong" because it is natural.

I hope this makes things clear.

Thanks, Mojo!

I haven't heard that any of mine or other near people to me ancecesstors had practiced it. Still if it remained in common practice in mass people since long, inspite became natural but society has disallowed it. Then it become a social issue.








Pre-informed---whatever to which our body has sense of right & wrong. If our body understand anything obiouisly it will handle that better in systematic manner. If not, body can be confused to that and may act in odd manner.

So you've finally accepted that right and wrong is a social issue, not a moral one.
You've yet to explain how allergies fit into that 'pre-informed' concept of yours.

We may also have to check Gluten related problems with cooking type?

Whether partially or fully cooked food discourage Gluten related probelems but denaturing/degrading the gluten?

Don't be ridiculous, Kumar.
Look it up for yourself.
Then explain how the condition is related to 'natural'.

 

[Kumar]

Sefishness can lie in:

When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

 

[fagin]

You can say anything you want to an elephant. It probably can't understand gibberish anyway.

 

[Mashuna]

Sefishness can lie in:

When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

And ignorance lies in calling an elephant a bird.






I admit, I do plan to run this analogy into the ground now.

 

[dafydd]

Sefishness can lie in:

When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

There's an elephant in my garden. He's picking up cabbages with his tail and you'll never guess where he's putting them.

 

[Daylightstar]

Sefishness can lie in:
....

This:

Do not insist on your own approach that many alternative systems do/can not work.

... and do it anyway.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

Saying to elephant as bird.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

If fried elephant is better cooked then baked elephant and cecome better digestible.

 

[Daylightstar]

There's an elephant in my garden. He's picking up cabbages with his tail and you'll never guess where he's putting them.

Ehm, I know I know, through the back, for elephant to be fully matured and for more healthful & digestable to us?

 

[dafydd]

Ehm, I know I know, through the back, for elephant to be fully matured and for more healthful & digestable to us?

Money saving on stuffing too and A&F oven ready not ready.

 

[Daylightstar]

As long as not odd exposure (cabbages in opposite/wrong side) which is not natural to us to which we are neither evolved nor habituated, brings adverses due to adverse effects.

 

[dafydd]

As long as not odd exposure (cabbages in opposite/wrong side) which is not natural to us to which we are neither evolved nor habituated, brings adverses due to adverse effects.

Karma elephant is not and is karma karma chameleon with natural natures in balancings.

 

[sackett]

Hey hey! Mr. K!

Kumar says: "In view of non-absolutism, Individuality exists in all these. Many things are told but individuality consideration still exist unless anything is A&F."

And I reply: "A&F is anything unless exist still consideration individuality but told are things many. These all in exists Individuality, non-absolutism of view in."

 

[Daylightstar]

Karma elephant is not and is karma karma chameleon with natural natures in balancings.

Hehehehe ?

 

[Daylightstar]

Kumar says: "In view of non-absolutism, Individuality exists in all these. Many things are told but individuality consideration still exist unless anything is A&F."

And I reply: "A&F is anything unless exist still consideration individuality but told are things many. These all in exists Individuality, non-absolutism of view in."

A perfect A&F example of how one may need to better understand it & post with sense.

 

[Daylightstar]

Karma elephant is not and is karma karma chameleon with natural natures in balancings.

Natural natures balancings exists in people at mass since long back, it bring motivation to do an needed act such as making elephant stuffing own with cabbages?

 

[Mojo]

Sefishness can lie in:

When one can't say to an elephant as elephant but say; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation but do not like/accept if other say that it is animal that eat vegetation.

That a large mammal that eats vegetation is not a bird is A&F. You are claiming that it could be a bird because it is not A&F that it is an elephant.

It could, for example, be a hippopotamus carrying a hosepipe and wearing false ears. This does not make it any less certain that it is not a bird.

 

[dafydd]

Natural natures balancings exists in people at mass since long back, it bring motivation to do an needed act such as making elephant stuffing own with cabbages?

Coming and going is not going and coming as finally absolute and absolutely final.