Cooking?

[pakeha]

Thanks. Few acts happen naturally as natural duties as a result of insticts/evolution whereas other acts are man made/manipulative. Eg. Parents do their natural duty to bear & nurse their children. They do spent money on them. But they do not treat this as investment & do not expect that it will be paid back to then by their children. Whereas when a person lend or give money to other do expect & get back that money.

What does this have to do with cooking?

Anything can also be based on adverses related to that thing. One can take precautions in taking less or non-effective thing--still benefit from placebo effects but one have to get adverses from things having adverse effects. It depend upon one liking & one's state.

Are you saying food poisoning can be averted by one's state?

 

[dafydd]

Are you saying food poisoning can be averted by one's state?

Yep, just think those bugs away.

 

[Mojo]

Are you saying food poisoning can be averted by one's state?

http://www.food.gov.uk/

 

[Daylightstar]

http://www.food.gov.uk/

Ah, not so much the state of mind but the state of mind the state is in.

 

[Kumar]

We may also have to check Gluten related problems with cooking type?

Whether partially or fully cooked food discourage Gluten related probelems but denaturing/degrading the gluten?

 

[Kumar]

I think, people here take advantage of following term, when they want to anyhow oppose or favour anyone:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada

Hence unless absolute truth is said, all other sayings can be either way as per one's linking. Therefore I insist on A&F when A&F is desired on other side.

 

[Mashuna]

I think, people here take advantage of following term, when they want to anyhow oppose or favour anyone:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada

Hence unless absolute truth is said, all other sayings can be either way as per one's linking. Therefore I insist on A&F when A&F is desired on other side.

I think you use this term as an excuse to ignore evidence against your views. You're acting like a blind man touching an elephant, and describing the wonderful feathered wings it has.

 

[Kumar]

I think you use this term as an excuse to ignore evidence against your views. You're acting like a blind man touching an elephant, and describing the wonderful feathered wings it has.

No, simply I want people with good sight should interpret it as an elephant not as big animal, big ears. big legs etc.

 

[Mojo]

We may also have to check Gluten related problems with cooking type?

Whether partially or fully cooked food discourage Gluten related probelems but denaturing/degrading the gluten?

As far as I am aware,

 

[Mojo]

No, simply I want people with good sight should interpret it as an elephant not as big animal, big ears. big legs etc.

But when people do this, you just ignore them on the grounds that they are not "A&F". Your observed behaviour does not fit your claim.

 

[Kumar]

But when people do this, you just ignore them on the grounds that they are not "A&F". Your observed behaviour does not fit your claim.

How can I shall know fully, when people will interpret it as a big animal, big ear etc.? Not A&F mean this way only.

 

[Mashuna]

No, simply I want people with good sight should interpret it as an elephant not as big animal, big ears. big legs etc.

But you don't think it's an elephant at all. We're trying to tell you that it's a large mammal that eats vegetation, and you're claiming that it actually lays eggs, flies around and builds nests. When we tell you that this isn't true, you claim that because we can't tell you A&F what makes up an elephant, your flying idea is just as valid.

 

[Kumar]

But you don't think it's an elephant at all. We're trying to tell you that it's a large mammal that eats vegetation, and you're claiming that it actually lays eggs, flies around and builds nests. When we tell you that this isn't true, you claim that because we can't tell you A&F what makes up an elephant, your flying idea is just as valid.

No, both side we are saying; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation.

 

[Mojo]

No, both side we are saying; it's a large mammal that eats vegetation.

No, you persist in claims that are clearly and demonstrably wrong, and use "A&F" as an excuse for rejecting all the evidence and explanations that are put in front of you. Mashuna's description of your behaviour is spot on.

 

[Kumar]

No, you persist in claims that are clearly and demonstrably wrong, and use "A&F" as an excuse for rejecting all the evidence and explanations that are put in front of you. Mashuna's description of your behaviour is spot on.

 

[Mojo]

Read the thread, Kumar. Pretending something hasn't happened when it is on view on the forum for anyone to see will not help you.

 

[Mashuna]

I'm afraid it's true.

 

[Daylightstar]

I think, people here take advantage of following term, when they want to anyhow oppose or favour anyone:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada

Hence unless absolute truth is said, all other sayings can be either way as per one's linking. Therefore I insist on A&F when A&F is desired on other side.

No, people can't take advantage of that term. That term is your religion which prevents you from learning anything.

...
To be Anekäntvädi: 1) Do not insist on your own approach, 2) ...

But you do it anyway.

 

[Kumar]

Read the thread, Kumar. Pretending something hasn't happened when it is on view on the forum for anyone to see will not help you.

Do not insist on your own approach that many alternative systems do/can not work.

 

[Mashuna]

Do not insist on your own approach that many alternative systems do/can not work.

Do not insist on your own approach that elephants can fly.