d4m10n
Penultimate Amazing
Which happens to be an accurate cut and paste, as it turns out.So, you want to talk about the content of Dawkins' "Dear Muslima" comment. I follow your link and am confronted with a list of links, rather than the content of the comment in question. So I click on the first link, which is the RationalWiki page for Elevatorgate then I CTRL-F to find the text, which I can then read.
They do cite their source, actually. It just isn't the original page, because that page is dead.But that page doesn't cite the original source, meaning that I'm actually no better off reading the text there than I would be if I had tried to follow a dead link in your post from which you, yourself, had quoted the text.
Here we just have to disagree.This is done more efficiently by quoting the relevant text.
I've already mentioned that the first article on the google search for "deep rifts" that you posted doesn't actually mention Rebecca Watson. Give that that was the assertion you were trying to support, what am I supposed to do then?
I was not trying to support that assertion at all. What I was trying to do was provide a quick way to understand that "deep rifts" is a term of art for the particular atheist schism that started in the wake of Elevatorgate.
