Continuation The Electric Comet Theory Boogaloo (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I happen to live in what appears to be EDM scars on Earth, ...
Sorry, Sol88, but ignorance about basic geology just emphasizes that you are wrong about astronomical images.

Arguments from ignorance/incredulity are not science, Sol88.

In the real world the MUPUS results make sense. They were expecting ices and dust in comets. So they designed MUPUS for the types of ices and duct they expected in comets. We had a wonderful surprise - 67P has a layer of ices and dust that was not expected. This will lead to actual science to determine why that layer is tougher than expected.

In the real world it is delusional to think that comets are solid rock that MUPUS should have been designed for.

In the real world " discharge etching here in the Kimberleys" is a delusion.
 
... we only have images to speculate over, what aleCcowaN, would you speculate in this image...
aleCcowaN does not have to speculate on an unattributed image, Sol88.
It as if you are not brave enough to show us what scientists who have the knowledge to analyze the image have said about the image :p

Anyone with eyes will know that the "white spots" are relatively bright areas in the image. Anyone who knows anything about 67P and is not in total denial of science will say that this is reflection from the dusty surface of 67P. So what would make dust vary in brightness? The obvious answer is more ices in the dust particles. This is supported by the spots looking to be mostly within pits or otherwise sheltered - less sublimation of ices from the surface.
 
Last edited:
The obvious answer is more ices in the dust particles.
Obviously!!! It can be nothing else :eusa_whistle:


Thanks for a least having a crack at it RC!

I think Capatain Swoop was on the correct track with
Over exposed pixels.

What caused the over exposure I wonder?
 
Last edited:
Obviously!!! It can be nothing else :eusa_whistle:


Thanks for a least having a crack at it RC!

I think Capatain Swoop was on the correct track with

What caused the over exposure I wonder?

Albedo in small areas of the image exceed the exposure contrast ratio latitude of the image system at the camera settings used and/or exceed the contrast ratio latitude of image compression algorithms and/or exceed the contrast ratio latitude of your image display system.
 
I would be hesitant to speculate on what specific chemical or physical effects or processes are present in those localized high albedo areas based exclusively on one image which you present in an altered form from the source (and without telling us).
 
Obviously!!! It can be nothing else :eusa_whistle:


Thanks for a least having a crack at it RC!

I think Capatain Swoop was on the correct track with

What caused the over exposure I wonder?

Exactly the same thing that causes over exposure on any photograph.
 
Looks a little like you'd expect EDM too look like! Etching away at the rock in circular scalloped depressions :)
 
Looks a little like you'd expect EDM too look like! Etching away at the rock in circular scalloped depressions :)

Tell us, what exact experiments has the EC / EU group done to actually show that electrical discharges would etch rock at all? And what Amperage/Voltage/Time is needed to achieve this? Because everything known by mainstream science about electricity, backed up by a LOT of experimental evidence, would suggest this would not happen.
 
Tell us, what exact experiments has the EC / EU group done to actually show that electrical discharges would etch rock at all? And what Amperage/Voltage/Time is needed to achieve this? Because everything known by mainstream science about electricity, backed up by a LOT of experimental evidence, would suggest this would not happen.

Experiments?
Pah!

EU people can imagine it working the way they want!
What more does anyone need?
 
Looks a little like you'd expect EDM too look like! Etching away at the rock in circular scalloped depressions :)

Congrats. Now it's your turn to ignore the direct questions I asked haig: what specific features are specifically and exclusively characteristic of electrical activity.

What specific characteristic features of sublimation erosion would be present that are not?

And the special bonus question just for sol8&:
How do we know If a terrain feature is a protuberance of depression?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom