Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Well let us see what is actually in that video from Dec 30, 2014 especially @2:20.
Starts with lying about "sublimating volatiles over time surely would not create the sharp, rock-like appearance of the comet".
Sublimating volatiles over time in the low gravity of a comet are expected to produce the observed features.
A fantasy abut standard models never predicting "such things" as debris fields.
More argument from ignorance. Astronomers were not surprised that ices and dust formed "flat and smooth layers with distinct boundaries between them" on 67P.
A lie about the EU community doing experiments over the past 15 years. The EU community rarely does science and even more rarely does valid science experiments. They certainly have not done any experiments in cometary conditions, e.g. ices and dust in vacuum.
There is a repeated delusion that the trivial fact that electric fields move dust means that the comet features comprised of ices and dust can be explained this way.
There is a repeated delusion that there is only dust on the surface of 67P.
There is a bit of implied cowardliness by not properly citing images labelled "Experiment: Billy Yelverton" and "Experiment: Zane Parker". These look like EU cranks doing high school science level demonstrations rather than published scientific experiments.
Starts with lying about "sublimating volatiles over time surely would not create the sharp, rock-like appearance of the comet".
Sublimating volatiles over time in the low gravity of a comet are expected to produce the observed features.
A fantasy abut standard models never predicting "such things" as debris fields.
More argument from ignorance. Astronomers were not surprised that ices and dust formed "flat and smooth layers with distinct boundaries between them" on 67P.
A lie about the EU community doing experiments over the past 15 years. The EU community rarely does science and even more rarely does valid science experiments. They certainly have not done any experiments in cometary conditions, e.g. ices and dust in vacuum.
There is a repeated delusion that the trivial fact that electric fields move dust means that the comet features comprised of ices and dust can be explained this way.
There is a repeated delusion that there is only dust on the surface of 67P.
There is a bit of implied cowardliness by not properly citing images labelled "Experiment: Billy Yelverton" and "Experiment: Zane Parker". These look like EU cranks doing high school science level demonstrations rather than published scientific experiments.
!
!/URL]