Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
My point was that nobody designs without help.
.
And my point is that if it's "no great shakes" to design a building, why should you need any help?





Show of hands please: did *anyone*, anywhere, get the point that CM needed more than 'common sense' to design a building because it's "no great shakes?"






And why is it up to the builder, following your 'common sense' design, to correct your mistakes? Why not hire someone to design the building who actually *knows* about how to design a safe building to begin with?
.
 
Last edited:
So I watched the video and found, as I had expected and openly predicted, that it had none at all. Despite that, I summarized it for others' benefit.

And we appreciate it! 55 minutes I'd never get back if i had watched it. Thing is, I already know what's in it without watching it.

It's a pile of crap.
 
Dismantling underway: 0% Dismantled
Error: Could Not Dismantle
Error Code: -43, No behavior data in misbehavior accusation

But, the video does now have one more view on it. So it must be winning the battle to dismantle the U.S., somehow.

Faced with tactics like that, the U.S. is as good as dismantled already. By Tuesday, do you think?


Ah, that hurt, didn't it. Had you read what i've written, you wouldn't claim that I was talking about "the U.S.". Well, maybe you would. It's serious, and dismantling is indeed already underway.

PNAC. The "Project for a New American Century". Suggests that there was an old american century, doesn't it? With all international institutions in effect still based on the outcome of WWII, the Empire which was saved for another decade (not a century) by the false-flag event of 9/11 is now coming to an end.

And you better help dismantling it in an orderly fashion so that a functioning republic and not only chaos remains.
 


Naturally, in a 50-minute radio episode. If your use of the word means something other than the possibilities listed in standard English dictionaries, perhaps you'd better explain that usage here in your own words, since I don't think anyone is likely to fall for the "everything is explained in this lengthy speech" claim a second day in a row.

Of course, if the point is not important, don't bother making the effort to "spoon-feed" us that way.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
PNAC. The "Project for a New American Century". Suggests that there was an old american century, doesn't it? With all international institutions in effect still based on the outcome of WWII, the Empire which was saved for another decade (not a century) by the false-flag event of 9/11 is now coming to an end.

And you better help dismantling it in an orderly fashion so that a functioning republic and not only chaos remains.

If only I had a nickel for every time I'd read something like this from a Truther, I could move out of this dump.
 
Then you know, of course, that if you were building something I was designing you'd let me know damn quick if the design wasn't safe or there was some other problem.
Redtail has something called "experience", which is generally more valuable than "common sense".

And even if she told you, you wouldn't listen.
 
Probably because if you actually wrote them down and looked at it, you'd realize how freakin stupid you'd sound.
This isn't actually an uncommon problem with CTs. I read a thread once by a guy who simply couldn't come up with a plausible moon-fakery scenario despite his best efforts, and decided to switch sides. Cue dogpile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom