Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

[Grizzly Bear]

Wake up. Never in a gazillion years could the towers pancake and completely collapse in under 30 seconds. It's impossible.

And your detailed explanation to support this is... ?

*patiently waiting for you to demonstrate your unrivaled study in architecture and engineering

 

[Clayton Moore]

And your detailed explanation to support this is... ?

*patiently waiting for you to demonstrate your unrivaled study in architecture and engineering

Common sense doesn't require detailed explanations. The 9/11 debunkers must have one hell of a difficult time crossing a street without a traffic signal.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Wouldn't it be less keystrokes to just type "It's at 34:50" than to deflect?

That requires that CE actually knows what's in the video.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Common sense doesn't require detailed explanations.

The problem you face is that reality requires more than "common sense." Sorry that reality is so harsh

 

[332nd]

Common sense doesn't require detailed explanations. The 9/11 debunkers must have one hell of a difficult time crossing a street without a traffic signal.

So you could design a skyscraper using only your "common sense"?

 

[dc1971]

Sounds like your speculation, which i'm not interested in.

So what is YOUR speculation??

 

[Clayton Moore]

So you could design a skyscraper using only your "common sense"?

Of course.

 

[Childlike Empress]

That requires that CE actually knows what's in the video.

Watch it and read #6051 again. Report back.

 

[Childlike Empress]

So what is YOUR speculation??

I don't speculate.

 

[The Big Dog]

Of course.

Bwhahaha!!

Oh mercy, Clayton troll somewhere else.

Funny, though. Incredibly stupid but funny!

 

[000063]

Quaint response. I advise you cease relying on old movies, such as Bridge Over the River Kwai, for your responses.

Never seen it. I have seen what happens when an airplane hits a building, though. Puts a great whomping hole in it. One that destroys several columns and damages others in a random and unpredictable fashion. In other words, it moves or removes the explosives, meaning there's no way for the bad guys to achieve the split-second timing they need.

It's kind of cute how you almost never make direct points, preferring to swoop in and make snide, pithy remarks like you think you're some sort of Terry Pratchett character. Except those characters actually make statements instead of passive-aggressive >implications.

Are you claiming the explosives would survive being hit by a jet and the subsequent fire?

 

[000063]

Common sense doesn't require detailed explanations. The 9/11 debunkers must have one hell of a difficult time crossing a street without a traffic signal.

Is it "common sense" to say "the sky is blue"?

 

[000063]

I don't speculate.

So all of your objections are based on nothing? One has to do some speculating to come up with theories. What's important is that you can back them with evidence.

You're like Clay, really. He hates to make any points and maintains a derisive attitude, and you hate to produce theories and have a snide, patronizing attitude.

 

[Childlike Empress]

One has to do some speculating to come up with theories.

Wow, you got it. Now ask yourself why I refuse to "come up with theories".

 

[Clayton Moore]

Bwhahaha!!

Oh mercy, Clayton troll somewhere else.

Funny, though. Incredibly stupid but funny!

What's the great shakes about designing a building?

 

[Clayton Moore]

So all of your objections are based on nothing? One has to do some speculating to come up with theories. What's important is that you can back them with evidence.

You're like Clay, really. He hates to make any points and maintains a derisive attitude, and you hate to produce theories and have a snide, patronizing attitude.

Condescending would be a better fit for me.

 

[tsig]

Yeah sure gravity. First three times for everything. Duuuuuuuuuuuh.

Things that don't happen for the first time never happen.

 

[000063]

Wow, you got it. Now ask yourself why I refuse to "come up with theories".

Wait, so you have no argument whatsoever? You don't think the attacks were faked?

 

[Childlike Empress]

You lost it again.

 

[tsig]

Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse








[qimg]http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top6.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top1a.jpg[/qimg]

http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top11.jpg

http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top10.jpg


Raging fires in the WTC buildings? No way.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse.html

Apples/oranges.