jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
The censoring of Project Censored..
http://aud1.kpfa.org/data/20100915-Wed1300.mp3 audio
'' This years new Project Censored 2011 Book has been released including numerous stories and references to the 9/11 cover up. Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff explain in this interview that they have been censored by so called "alternative" left wing publications because of their refusal to drop 9/11 truth content!
From the show notes: "Censored 2011" with Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff. We discuss the new Project Censored book and some of the most censored news stories of the past year. --END--''
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-21/project-censored-censored-because-stance-911-truth
It just get's more and more obvious. Is America still a full scale Democracy ?
http://www.projectcensored.org/
Hmm, 9/11 conspiracies are not mentioned on the home page of 'Project Censored"
I call cover-up.
ETA: Ok, in the interview he does mention that they wrote a piece in which they cited Gage and Griffin and "peer reviewed" scientific papers concerning 9/11. That did it for me. You can complain all you want about censorship but when you cite articles that can be shown to NOT be peer reviewed in the accepted fashion and thus show how you simply do not understand how such things work, you destroy your credibility.
So what does the Inter Press Service say about why they stopped taking articles from these two?
Last edited: