Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The censoring of Project Censored..

http://aud1.kpfa.org/data/20100915-Wed1300.mp3 audio

'' This years new Project Censored 2011 Book has been released including numerous stories and references to the 9/11 cover up. Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff explain in this interview that they have been censored by so called "alternative" left wing publications because of their refusal to drop 9/11 truth content!

From the show notes: "Censored 2011" with Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff. We discuss the new Project Censored book and some of the most censored news stories of the past year. --END--''

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-21/project-censored-censored-because-stance-911-truth

It just get's more and more obvious. Is America still a full scale Democracy ?

http://www.projectcensored.org/

Hmm, 9/11 conspiracies are not mentioned on the home page of 'Project Censored"

I call cover-up.

ETA: Ok, in the interview he does mention that they wrote a piece in which they cited Gage and Griffin and "peer reviewed" scientific papers concerning 9/11. That did it for me. You can complain all you want about censorship but when you cite articles that can be shown to NOT be peer reviewed in the accepted fashion and thus show how you simply do not understand how such things work, you destroy your credibility.

So what does the Inter Press Service say about why they stopped taking articles from these two?
 
Last edited:
http://www.projectcensored.org/

Hmm, 9/11 conspiracies are not mentioned on the home page of 'Project Censored"

I call cover-up.

ETA: Ok, in the interview he does mention that they wrote a piece in which they cited Gage and Griffin and "peer reviewed" scientific papers concerning 9/11. That did it for me. You can complain all you want about censorship but when you cite articles that can be shown to NOT be peer reviewed in the accepted fashion and thus show how you simply do not understand how such things work, you destroy your credibility.

So what does the Inter Press Service say about why they stopped taking articles from these two?

Check it out yourself. I am busy doing my work as a conspiracy analyst.
 
Can't find anything specifically on why IPS stopped taking articles by these writers. Its their perogative though and if they found that the pieces written were not well researched then they can simply refuse them. Try to submit the same thing again with a slightly different take and you get told not to darken the doorstep again.

I did find that project censored had as its #2 top censored strory of 2007 was Bush's move towards martial law.
Hmmm , could it be that they got that wrong? Could it be that Bush was not actually trying to implement martial law? He certainly did not institute it after all and his party lost the presidency largely due to his actions.
 
From 2003/04 (I cannot find one from 2002, the 2001 book includes only stories up to 2000)
This is the only one in the top ten concerning 9/11 and its case revolves around a supposed LIHOP theory.

9. Widow brings RICO case against U.S. government for 9/11.



Under the Civil Racketeering, Influences, and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, Ellen Mariani is suing President Bush and officials for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death; her husband, Louis Neil Mariani, was a passenger on Flight 175 that was flown into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11.



The suit documents the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that compelling evidence will be presented in this case, through discovery, subpoena power and testimony, that defendants failed to act to prevent 9/11, knowing the attacks would lead to an international war on terror.



Berg believes that Defendant Bush is invoking a long standard operating procedure of national security and executive privilege claims to suppress the basis of this lawsuit.



On November 26, 2003, a press conference was set up to discuss the full implications of these charges. Only FOX News attended the conference and taped 40 minutes, however, the film was never aired.
 
I just finished listening to another recent and relevant interview with Mickey Huff.

Progressive Radio News Hour with Stephen Lendman from Sunday
Idiots, with delusions. Good job, no wonder you think CIT has something. 2 idiots who think DRG has facts, these two are dolts, liars and idiots. Good find if you were looking for idiots.

You have no facts and these two dolts don't know what facts are. Scientific facts? lol, two dolts.

If anyone wants to waste time, DRG junk is near the end of the HOUR of talk; no facts, no evidence; pure nonsense on 911.
 
Last edited:
Why America Cannot Win in Afghanistan

An interview with Pakistani General (ret.) Hamid Gul, by Bonnie Faulkner, “Guns and Butter,” KPFA-FM, Wednesday, September 8,2010
In this important interview, Gen. Hamid Gul explains that the US war in Afghanistan was doomed from the start. As a military professional with a distinguished career, he identifies the key factors that determine success or failure in war, and shows that the US is failing in almost every area.

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-24/why-america-cannot-win-afghanistan

http://aud1.kpfa.org/data/20100908-Wed1300.mp3 audio
 
You mean Obama saying that you American civilians can take another 9/11 style attack ? Yes I believe it.

That's a cold hearted post, Bill. So you would agree that the terrorists plot another 9/11 like event & kill thousands more people so you can get your jollies off? SICK! :mad:
 
Why America Cannot Win in Afghanistan

An interview with Pakistani General (ret.) Hamid Gul, by Bonnie Faulkner, “Guns and Butter,” KPFA-FM, Wednesday, September 8,2010
In this important interview, Gen. Hamid Gul explains that the US war in Afghanistan was doomed from the start.

Gul has been unabashedly anti-American for decades. What value does anything he says have?
 
I am not sure if this has been covered, or if it deserves its own page, but I found this little site while doing a google search.

http://debunkingdad.blogspot.com/

It APPEARS to be written by the child of KEVIN BARRETT, and it is actually a DEBUNKING site. Guess (if the site is legit), the truth does not run in the family.

TAM:D
 
Nice find TAM!! Excellent work!! You shall see a bonus in your NWO paycheck this payday! Just fill out the standard 990-F-NWO-PD bonus form, and you shall get the bonus!
 
Make sure you give it to the black hatted man with the silver boots.

TAM (Agent 911)

:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom