Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
He wants to go from 1 in 3 ( a very optimistic take on this as it is) to 1 in 2.

Hmm that sounds easy except what he means is he wants to go from 33% to 50% (and given he wants a majority it would actually have to be greater than 50%) of the population.

In every 1 million persons then he wants to go from 330,000 to 500,000. So now instead of convincing 1 person its up to convincing 170,000. Multiply that by the number, in millions, of adults in the USA.

And millions of people in the U.S. still think Truthers are insane & paranoid. I'm glad Bill O'Reilly & Jon Stewart poke fun at their organisation. Wait, they have no organisation, because they still aren't organised enough to make up their minds on which CTs to follow.
 
I stopped watching the second they said these morons were basing their beliefs on Gage's "research"...

Sure even the FBI itself was full of admiration for Richard Gage's research when he sent them some of his analysis for comment. They sent him a letter saying so and called it 'thorough research' if I remember rightly.
 
Last edited:
Sure even the FBI itself was full of admiration for Richard Gage's research when he sent them some of his analysis for comment. They sent him a letter saying so and called it 'thorough research' if I remember rightly.

Yeah...in 2008.

After reading said letter...it sure as hell seems like a big ol' brush off to me.

Thanks, but no thanks!
 
I see no reason at this time to associate Israel with 9/11.And if it should turn out that I am wrong....why, we will deal with that later after we break the American end of the 9/11 conspiracy. No rush..

After nine years of total failure, I wouldn't really expect a "rush".
 
Last edited:
No I don't think the mainstream media reported it

of course they didn't. First of all there was nothing to report on as it was a simple advertisement for the various 911 conspiracy web sites.
though I have high hopes that the MM detect the writing on the wall and, like the rats that they mostly are, are deserting the sinking ship..See video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKvGITcmXOc&feature=player_embedded

So in order to 'prove' a point you submit a video that is an edited version of a MSM bit about a conspiracy theory?
Point is that after 9 years, NINE, there still is no serious MSM attention paid to your cause.
On and near the anniversaries and on slow news days you get a bit of coverage. The reason for this is mostly due to editors trying to find a new slant on what is essentially old news. You may get more exposure on later anniversaries but it won't be for the reasons you want.

nine or nineteen
or 90, or 1900!
 
of course they didn't. First of all there was nothing to report on as it was a simple advertisement for the various 911 conspiracy web sites.


So in order to 'prove' a point you submit a video that is an edited version of a MSM bit about a conspiracy theory?
Point is that after 9 years, NINE, there still is no serious MSM attention paid to your cause.
On and near the anniversaries and on slow news days you get a bit of coverage. The reason for this is mostly due to editors trying to find a new slant on what is essentially old news. You may get more exposure on later anniversaries but it won't be for the reasons you want.


or 90, or 1900!

It was a long long way from 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists' though wasn't it JD ? And I loved that they broadcast the 'thermite all over the place---high grade military eplosive ' (paraphrasing). Yes I was rubbing my hands together at that..
 
It was a long long way from 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists' though wasn't it JD ? And I loved that they broadcast the 'thermite all over the place---high grade military eplosive ' (paraphrasing). Yes I was rubbing my hands together at that..

Actually so was I given that it was not "all over the place", the material found cannot be positively labeled as thermite anyway, and thermite is not an explosive let alone a "high grade military explosive" (used by "Mythbusters" and by Pop-Sci in their own videos and its possible to make it in your garage).

As for a long way from 'crazy conspiracists', ok the parts of the Arizona local newscast that were used, yes it is. However given that it was highly edited I cannot, nor can you, demonstrate that the idea that these theories are crazy was not made during the segment. That is unless you have a link to the original segment?

Of course the producers of this video then go on to prove they are indeed lacking the same sense of reality that most people have when they go on to quote Silverstein and claim that he said WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition. Oh and I gotta love the audio manipulation to make Silverstein sound even more evil. Priceless!

I was disappointed though that "clunkity-clunk" was not included. That would have made my day right there.
 
Last edited:
Actually so was I given that it was not "all over the place", the material found cannot be positively labeled as thermite anyway, and thermite is not an explosive let alone a "high grade military explosive" (used by "Mythbusters" and by Pop-Sci in their own videos and its possible to make it in your garage).

As for a long way from 'crazy conspiracists', ok the parts of the Arizona local newscast that were used, yes it is. However given that it was highly edited I cannot, nor can you, demonstrate that the idea that these theories are crazy was not made during the segment. That is unless you have a link to the original segment?

Of course the producers of this video then go on to prove they are indeed lacking the same sense of reality that most people have when they go on to quote Silverstein and claim that he said WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition. Oh and I gotta love the audio manipulation to make Silverstein sound even more evil. Priceless!

I was disappointed though that "clunkity-clunk" was not included. That would have made my day right there.

Yes, I'm sure you really enjoyed it. lol. Very Freudian of you to mention that the audio was manipulated '' to make Silverstein sound even more evil ''. Personally I didn't notice any manipulation at all.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I'm sure you really enjoyed it. lol. Very Freudian of you to mention that the audio was manipulated '' to make Silverstein sound even more evil ''. Personally I didn't notice any manipulation at all.

Not really sure how any of that has to do with Freud. :confused: But you don't understand science and physics either...so whatever.
 
The censoring of Project Censored..

http://aud1.kpfa.org/data/20100915-Wed1300.mp3 audio

'' This years new Project Censored 2011 Book has been released including numerous stories and references to the 9/11 cover up. Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff explain in this interview that they have been censored by so called "alternative" left wing publications because of their refusal to drop 9/11 truth content!

From the show notes: "Censored 2011" with Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff. We discuss the new Project Censored book and some of the most censored news stories of the past year. --END--''

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-21/project-censored-censored-because-stance-911-truth

It just get's more and more obvious. Is America still a full scale Democracy ?
 
Last edited:
... It just get's more and more obviouus. Is America still a full scale Democracy ?
Spewing lies is not the goal of Democracy. Your delusions are more like NAZI lies, spewing lies for the party, the dirt dumb delusion mongers, 911 truth. America is not about failure, 911 truth is all about failure; you like failure and prove it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom