Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
What about this one Funk ? Do you think that there is a degree of orchestration going on with all the recent releases or do do think that the OCT has finally fallen apart ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yaxk5XQpR0

Wow ''The View'' gave the entire audience a free copy of Jessie's new book. What's going on ?
Click to expand...

You would have to ask Lashl to be sure but I think that Jessie Ventura directly accused Dick Cheney of carrying out 9/11 in the clip above. On National TV.

Cheney will surely sue now won't he ? This would be a golden opportunity to prove in court that he had nothing to do with bringing 9/11 about.

But what if he doesn't sue ?
Doesn't that make it look like he did it? I'm sure that's how it will be played up anyway unless somebody has a better explanation that is not laughable.
 
Last edited:
"All I do is ask questions!"
this space intentionally left blank Jesse Ventura

*HuffPo shuts you out for being ignorant of the answers*

And there was your answer.


 
You really have to wonder about Ventura's navy hitch, if he even served at all. Why would a navy seal ask how steel beams got thrown 500 feet? Shows he knows nothing about explosives at all.
 
Last edited:
AJM8125 said:
You really have to wonder about Ventura's navy hitch, if he even served at all. Why would a navy seal would ask how steel beams got thrown 500 feet? Shows he knows nothing about explosives at all.
Click to expand...

[nitpick]Not a SEAL, UDT (Underwater Demolitions Team) which was merged into the SEAL's after he left the navy. [/nitpick]

He knows (or should know) better. In my opinion he's either completely lost it mentally or he is looking for an angle to make money by cashing in on his name to get on television shows that actually are watched by normal sane people to sell his book (or both).
 
Record Breaker! This week we broke the record for the amount of live listeners twice. Congratulations to Gary Null on breaking the record and thank you all for your continued support.
Three Day in-depth report on 9/11 truth with Gary Null on Progressive Radio Network with record amount of listeners

Here are the three radio-shows:
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-gary-null-show-wnye/

Today’s guest is Ian Henshall and he is a British based investigative journalist and author, whose book “9/11 Revealed: The New Evidence” has raised a lot of voice across Europe.

Also on the today’s program, is Professor Niels Harrit and he is an associate professor in the Chemistry Department at th University of Copenhagen, Denmark - where he has taught for the past 35 plus years.

Also on today’s program, is Professor Steve Jones and he is a professor emeritus in physics specializing in catalyzed fusion or cold nuclear fusion at Brigham Young University.

http://www.garynull.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/GaryNullShow030910.mp3

Today’s guest is Richard Gage and he is a San Francisco based architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects.

read on...
http://911blogger.com/node/22904
 
Just listening to that interview with Richard Gage I can see that we think more along the same lines every day. Now Richard says that the 110 Acres of steel floor decking that is missing is in the dust. Exactly as I have been saying for a year or more. He says that there is almost zip as regards large pieces of concrete on the ground. About the top one-tenth of WTC1 being the lightest part of the building. He should start to stress the 220 acres (9 MILLION square feet) of steel floor reinforcing (2 layers in each floor) that is also missing.

He will be talking about the nanothermite INSIDE the hollow core columns next and the 10-15,000 ton pool of molten steel bubbling in the basements of WTC1.

** The leader of firefighters for 9/11 Truth. Eric Lawyer is also interviewed in the Richard Gage clip.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Just listening to that interview with Richard Gage I can see that we think more along the same lines every day. Now Richard says that the 110 Acres of steel floor decking that is missing is in the dust. Exactly as I have been saying for a year or more. He says that there is almost zip as regards large pieces of concrete on the ground. About the top one-tenth of WTC1 being the lightest part of the building. He should start to stress the 220 acres (9 MILLION square feet) of steel floor reinforcing (2 layers in each floor) that is also missing.

He will be talking about the nanothermite INSIDE the hollow core columns next and the 10-15,000 ton pool of molten steel bubbling in the basements of WTC1.

** The leader of firefighters for 9/11 Truth. Eric Lawyer is also interviewed in the Richard Gage clip.
Click to expand...


Bill, if the steel is missing where did the molten steel come from?
 
bill smith said:
You would have to ask Lashl to be sure but I think that Jessie Ventura directly accused Dick Cheney of carrying out 9/11 in the clip above. On National TV.

Cheney will surely sue now won't he ? This would be a golden opportunity to prove in court that he had nothing to do with bringing 9/11 about.

But what if he doesn't sue ?
Doesn't that make it look like he did it? I'm sure that's how it will be played up anyway unless somebody has a better explanation that is not laughable.
Click to expand...

You are assuming that Cheney knows or gives a hoot about Ventura, or what he says.

TAM:)
 
bill smith said:
You would have to ask Lashl to be sure but I think that Jessie Ventura directly accused Dick Cheney of carrying out 9/11 in the clip above. On National TV.

Cheney will surely sue now won't he ? This would be a golden opportunity to prove in court that he had nothing to do with bringing 9/11 about.

But what if he doesn't sue ?
Doesn't that make it look like he did it? I'm sure that's how it will be played up anyway unless somebody has a better explanation that is not laughable.
Click to expand...

In this country we have something called the First Amendment that protects idiots like Gage and Venture,
 
It's surprising that considering all the complaints I see about the first amendment that they would in fact condone it so that as they put it "the accused could defend themselves" against outlandish claims by suing. I don't think bill knows what the first amendment is.
 
bill smith said:
I believe this gem from Mike Rivero absolutely. Who wants to deny this Truth.

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."
Click to expand...


I can't think I know of anyone that thinks their leaders are just and fair!
We know they are human and being politicians probably worse than the rest of us but we also know this has ALWAYS been the case yet we still live in one of the most free countries in the world.........go figure.
 
funk de fino said:
I think Ian Henshall is a lying piece of crap.
Click to expand...

Funk
You have soiled the lying piece of crap's reputation. The crap objects.

"A book is released in Britain called 9/11 Revealed: Challenging the Facts Behind the War on Terror, written by radical British journalists Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan. The Daily Mail calls it “a hugely provocative—many would say fantastical—yet, at times, genuinely disturbing new analysis of 9/11.” According to the London Times, the authors “have subjected the official version of what happened to intense scrutiny and found huge gaps.” The book examines the various theories suggesting the Bush administration was complicit in carrying out the 9/11 attacks, so as to give Bush the excuse to go ahead with his long-held plan to invade Iraq. They examine theories that the Twin Towers and Building 7 of the WTC were brought down deliberately with explosives; that the Pentagon was hit by a military drone aircraft and a missile; that Flight 11 and Flight 175, which supposedly hit the Twin Towers, were in fact landed and replaced by remote-controlled substitutes; that cell phone calls from the hijacked planes were faked; and that the military’s response to the hijackings was hindered by an air defense exercise taking place at the same time as the attacks. The Daily Mail concludes, “In their inquiries Henshall and Morgan may have discovered no smoking guns - but they have certainly left a whiff of something sinister in the air.” [Morgan and Henshal"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom