Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chewie,

I got excited when I saw that in your first few posts you ended them with some reference or what have you to Chewie. Now you never do it. :(

And I think Bill is a girl.

Don't worry my young padawan. The Debunker Force is strong with us. It binds us & penetraits.

Don't worry. I got some Star Wars quotes that I modified to suit my needs:

9/11 wasn't and "Inside Job". Trust your feelings, you know it to be true.

This little one's not worth the effort.

That wizard is just a crazy old man.

Don't underestimate the Force.

If Al-Queda has obtained a complete technical reading of the World Trade Centers, it is possible, however likely, they might find a weakness and exploit it.

Your sad devotion to the Conspiracy Theories has not helped you conjure up the evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job, or given you clairvoyance.

The Debunker Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded.

Don't call me a mindless shill, you overweight glob of grease.

Look, Your Distastefulness, let's get one thing straight. I take orders from just one person: me.

Your Truther friend is quite the mercenary. I wonder if he really cares about anything. Or anybody.

I've just about had enough of you. Go that way. You'll be malfunctioning within a day, you near-sighted Truther. And don't let me catch you following me begging for help because you won't get it.
 
Never trust any YouTube video that a Truther puts on JREF. Because it's editted by them & they use Windows Movie Maker to edit in explosive sounds that aren't from the original video.

I managed to find a CD vid & a vid of WTC Collasping (WTC vid was close to the collaspe) & compared them. Bill just got upset. Oh well!

For Bill:

"Don't be too proud of those technological errors you've constructed."
 
Last edited:
Now it's faked audio Bill? Anything controversial, to get a rise...I'm surprised people still respond to you.

Bill's existence on this forum has virtually ceased since making all posts from users on my ignore list completely hidden :)
 
Now it's faked audio Bill? Anything controversial, to get a rise...I'm surprised people still respond to you.

Use your own word Mitch. I can go with 'modified' just as easily. All the audio of explosions has been doctored. Ask any eyewitness of the thousands of reports.

Nice democratic posting on that thread the other day I must say. It went entirely unappreciated by your fellow debunkers I noticed. Don't let them supress democratic values. Everybody should have a voice.
 
Richard Gage piles on the pressure. (The debunking director of the jref gets a frame or two)

http://blip.tv/file/2716460/

NIST wouldn't admit that WTC7 was brought down by explosives simply because there's no evidence to support that theory.

1: No primacord found

2: No copper residue found on steel supports

Gage, by definition is a total idiot. Sorry, but he is.

For someone to study fire proofing for 20 years & then throw 20 years of that study out the window for a crazy theory about Controlled Demolition is just idiotic. He totally throws out the fires that raged inside WTC7, since his study is based on fire proofing.

Gage is still a practicing architech mind you. He doesn't have the qualifications to make a judgement call on WTC7 being a Controlled Demolition. He's not an expert in that field.

Anything Gage says about WTC7 is complete & utter BS. But Bill, like any other Truther out there, buys into his silly Fairy Stories about the building.

Gage just knows about fire proofing buildings. That's it, nothing more!
 
Last edited:
On a French forum, an idiot (tries to) answer the question that Gravy asked:

"What's the logical connection in We've had such loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building?"

He answered: "Public Security".

I know his answer is pure nonsense, but all I can oppose is that two towers fell down two hours before Silverstein received that call, so the public security should have been applied before the Twin Towers fell down.

Do you, all of debunkers, have a better argument? ;)
 
Last edited:
On a French forum, an idiot (tries to) answer the question that Gravy asked:

"What's the logical connection in We've had such loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building?"

He answered: "Public Security".

I know his answer is pure nonsense, but all I can oppose is that two towers fell down two hours before Silverstein received that call, so the public security should have been applied before the Twin Towers fell down.

Do you, all of debunkers, have a better argument? ;)


Do you have the show ? In the meantime have a listen to Lord Griffin on the Alex Jones Show. All four parts.
What will happen with you debunkers ? Will you all just evaporate overnight ?

http://www.911blogger.com/
 
Last edited:
I love it....
we have griffin who RAN to europe to avoid Ryan Mackey.

We have griffin who RAN from R. Mackeys Whitepaper in Japan...

now he is on AJ and we are supposed to be .... intimidated? afraid?

The best part is that anyone who can show how full of crap AJ and Griffin are will just get hung up on ... I love da twoof.
 
I love it....
we have griffin who RAN to europe to avoid Ryan Mackey.

We have griffin who RAN from R. Mackeys Whitepaper in Japan...

now he is on AJ and we are supposed to be .... intimidated? afraid?

The best part is that anyone who can show how full of crap AJ and Griffin are will just get hung up on ... I love da twoof.

Let's face it- the OCT is running like an open sore. Despite a complicit media this can fire up at any second. There are Traitors everywhere in the 9/11 OCT.

Here's Neils Harrit.
http://magiciansfor911truth.org/
 
Last edited:
Any. Day. Now. What a great time this must be for Truthers laughing at the desperate last stand of the government shills. :D
 
Let's face it- the OCT is running like an open sore. Despite a complicit media this can fire up at any second. There are Traitors everywhere in the 9/11 OCT.

Here's Neils Harrit.
http://magiciansfor911truth.org/

And here's NH:

"Dr. Harrit: Definitely, that’s the whole thing, because the smaller the particle is, the greater the surface area. This is what you call, geometrical truth. Our bodies, well, excuse me this is because the surface goes with the radius squared, and the volume goes with the radius to the third. So the larger the body, the smaller the surface."

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090415231352441

so you agree with that Bill?
 
More to the point, do you agree with this, bill, from the same source?

Niels Harrit said:
An explosive is defined as a process which develops gasses very quickly. In the ordinary black gun powder the gasses being developed there is carbon dioxide which everyone knows these days of the green house effect, and sulfur dioxide and some nitrogen oxide, and this is a mixture you know was invented in China, it was 1200 years ago or more, yea, about that. You mix carbon and sulfur and saltpeter and you get reacting and this develops actually not so very rapidly, but it develops rapidly carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and the gasses developed can then push a cannon ball out of the barrel. And it was not very efficient in the beginning, but has become more efficient later on. Now these days….but it’s a very nice picture actually, on what nano, on what the nano thermite is because in the gun powder, you have the ingredients I told about these chemical partners we have to react. In the gun powder, it is also a mixture of powders. It’s carbon and it’s sulfur and it’s saltpeter. But in modern explosives, the two partners are now in the same molecule which means that the trajectory of the electrons have to do when getting from one side to another is much smaller and this is why TNT or nitroglycerin or dynamite which are….they are so efficient because there the two partners are in the same molecule, and these are explosives. Now what happens when turn you ordinary thermite into nanothermite is that you are approaching the same situation as in a molecule with the classical explosives. There is a convergence between what we call bulk materials and what we call molecular materials and they are converging into nanotechnology. So you get the best of two worlds. You get all the energy of the thermite. There is more energy in the thermite than in dynamite or TNT. There is more energy in the thermite, but the classical thermite is slow. But when you convert it into nano technology it becomes fast and so you get an explosive which is more efficient than the classical explosives. It is smaller, cheaper, and nastier.

Tell me if you think he's right, and then I'll tell you why he's wrong.

Dave
 
And here's NH:

"Dr. Harrit: Definitely, that’s the whole thing, because the smaller the particle is, the greater the surface area. This is what you call, geometrical truth. Our bodies, well, excuse me this is because the surface goes with the radius squared, and the volume goes with the radius to the third. So the larger the body, the smaller the surface."

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090415231352441

so you agree with that Bill?

Sounds a little confused to me. I think the the take-away message should be that the smaller the particle the relatively greater it's surface area. So nanothermite goes further...more for less....more bang for your buck. lol
 
More to the point, do you agree with this, bill, from the same source?



Tell me if you think he's right, and then I'll tell you why he's wrong.

Dave

All this silly arguing over fine detail does not matter any more Dave. We have found the unexploded thermite in the dust. We can still make it ignite energetically. IT IS THERE, AND WE HAVE PROVEN IT. That is enough.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom