Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Edited by Tricky: 
removed response to modded post.
I didn't claim it was perfect. I doesn't feel pain but I do!There are new patches and updates in the works.

NIST did not fully disclose computer simulation methodology
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Document disclaimers render all subsequent data questionable. NIST did not progress beyond forumlating the hypothesis.

Macgyver1968: Logic board upgrade request granted. Self-diagnosis in progress..."whirrrr..." Herd mentality alert security patch applied.
 
That is your prerogative, ingnore the truth of RT3000 (w/sp1) at your own peril!
 
Not working in well ventilated workstation causes= ElCid

In eight years the twoof movement didnt even get as far as formulating a hypothesis, twoof. Hey don't be inhaling the solder fumes while putting together your little project there twoof. It can cause mental retardation..
 
Last edited:
*system check* Ventilation ducts operating normally.

Inside job macg? How dare you. Actually I don't think it was (inputting). Give me a sec....she's a bit slow today for some reason. Herd mentality deflection is overloading main CPU, I'll bring another CPU online.

Inside job verified as common knowledge among multiple intelligence agencies across the world.

I myself admittedly don't fully understand why RT3000 insists on questioning the NIST reports, I did not program it to be so.....skeptical. I think it's a good question for RT3000.

What do 60 of the world's most influential scientists* have in common?
They all agree that the Bush administration has systematically distorted scientific fact to meet its political goals on issues ranging from military intelligence to health to the environment and more.
* Including 20 Nobel laureates, 19 recipients of the National Medal of Science and two former Republican presidential advisors.

According to these scientists, President Bush and his administration have:
deliberately stacked advisory panels with political appointees
censored and disregarded government scientists and reports when they conflict with the administration's political goals
disbanded scientific panels whose advice conflicted with Bush administration policies.
 
ElCid throwing his feces on the walls of different rooms to see if it sticks

ElCid said:
What do 60 of the world's most influential scientists* have in common?
They all agree that the Bush administration has systematically distorted scientific fact to meet its political goals on issues ranging from military intelligence to health to the environment and more.
* Including 20 Nobel laureates, 19 recipients of the National Medal of Science and two former Republican presidential advisors.

According to these scientists, President Bush and his administration have:
deliberately stacked advisory panels with political appointees
censored and disregarded government scientists and reports when they conflict with the administration's political goals
disbanded scientific panels whose advice conflicted with Bush administration policies.
Click to expand...

Spamming from your other non 911 related post is illogical Twoof. do you think you can wave this little sound bite around like a magic wand and apply it to both global warming AND 911 conspiracy and gain any traction? Can you point out what exactly was censored in the nist reports? anything twoof? Disbanded what 9/11 scientific panels? anything? got nothing at all twoof?
 
Last edited:
Your points are very valid good sir! However in RT3000's defense I must state that my input only asked it to state why it insisted on questioning the reports. I don't think she indicated that those signatures were in regard to 9/11, merely the bush-era of science in general.

I think my posting of on this data on the other topic was pretty dead on in relation to the subject at hand, but I understand if you disagree. Your concerns are duly noted.
 
okay, sorry to waste you guy's time. Really, it was kind of uncalled for.

But all the name calling? It doesn't bother me so much but RT3000 did not bounce back as resiliently. She's taken to sobbing in the corner. I tried to reassure that none of it was true, and that all of you were only projecting the pain that you hold inside....she didn't really buy it. Looks like I'll have to shut her down until further system improvements are developed. You won this round you fiends.
 
ElCid said:
Your points are very valid good sir! However in RT3000's defense I must state that my input only asked it to state why it insisted on questioning the reports. I don't think she indicated that those signatures were in regard to 9/11, merely the bush-era of science in general.

I think my posting of on this data on the other topic was pretty dead on in relation to the subject at hand, but I understand if you disagree. Your concerns are duly noted.
Click to expand...
You don't need a machine to produce moronic delusions; what a waste. You have not read the NIST report to see if your moronic statement generated by the dolt impostor machine was true.
Your machine has the same set of evidence as the conspiracy theorists on 911; zero
 
Last edited:
(looks again inside the RT3000)

You got the polarity of your XB9-400 common sense chip reversed. I think that's why your are getting faulty output data.

For instance:

Inside job verified as common knowledge among multiple intelligence agencies across the world.
Click to expand...

With the polarity reversed, you keep getting unsubstanciated output data, like that above. If you correct the polarity, you will probably get better results.

The Mac1000-XL logic analizer, with correct polarity on it's common sense chip, outputed this:

If 9/11 was an inside job, and multiple intelligence agencies know about it, then why the hell don't they say something?
Click to expand...
:)
 
Last edited:
Absolutely the strangest round of trolling or pulling our legs I've ever seen.
 
It's not very realistice, that's for sure. You can still see the grave of El Cid's horse in San Pedro de Cardeña.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom