Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
apathoid said:
Do you really want us to answer that?
Click to expand...

The better question is: Why did RedIbis dodge the legitimate questions asked in the post to which he purported to respond with such a stupid "answer" in the form of yet another dodging question?

Here's the post to which he purported to respond, which sets out all of the questions to which he failed to respond:

Originally Posted by Lupie
Is this what YOU GUYS call proving 9/11 was an inside job? I know that's what you would like it to sound like. But in reality, it just sounds like more truther crybaby excuses. Do you ever actually articulate any real facts? Do you ever actually answer anyone's legitimate question with something other than a dodge and an overused, sarcastic excuse? How in the heck do you ever expect to bring the perpetrators to justice in a court of law with these lame responses? I'm only asking questions.
Click to expand...
 
LashL said:
The better question is: Why did RedIbis dodge the legitimate questions asked in the post to which he purported to respond with such a stupid "answer" in the form of yet another dodging question?
Click to expand...


He does it because running away is what RedIbis does best. God forbid he accidentally types something which may eventually be proven to be false, logically inconsistent, or Stundie-caliber silly; better to just "ask questions" than actually engage in what could be a meaningful debate.
 
RedIbis said:
Yes.
Click to expand...

If truther means someone who believes in 911 CT, then I would say a truther is someone who is either ignorant, of low intelligence, a liar or insane.

If there is another definition for it, I would like to hear it.
 
RedIbis said:
What's a truther?
Click to expand...

In my experiences online and in real life I have noticed that a truther is usually one or more of the following:

1. Uninformed
2. Uneducated
3. Unintelligent
4. Unemployed
5. Paranoid
6. Mentally ill
7. Arrogant
8. Impractical
9. Imaginative
10.Gullible

These seem to be the ten most common characteristics that I have encountered when dealing with truthers.
 
DGM said:
Is it a reading comprehension problem with you? When have I tried to bog down the discussion to avoid solution? Specific examples, please.
Click to expand...


By pointing to the quote in your sig. This applies to people of all groups to some extent - it has nothing to do with a definition of the word "truther" as you understand it. You know, the thing RedIbis and JihadJane asked for.
 
Childlike Empress said:
By pointing to the quote in your sig. This applies to people of all groups to some extent - it has nothing to do with a definition of the word "truther" as you understand it. You know, the thing RedIbis and JihadJane asked for.
Click to expand...
How can you say it "has nothing to do with the definition of a truther? As I understand it?

For RedIbis and JihadJane;
A truther is one that uses speculation and lies while dismissing evidence that is contrary to their beliefs to forward (and bolster) their views of the events of 9/11/01. (While bogging down the discussion)

Better CE?
 
Last edited:
newton3376 said:
In my experiences online and in real life I have noticed that a truther is usually one or more of the following:

1. Uninformed
2. Uneducated
3. Unintelligent
4. Unemployed
5. Paranoid
6. Mentally ill
7. Arrogant
8. Impractical
9. Imaginative
10.Gullible

These seem to be the ten most common characteristics that I have encountered when dealing with truthers.
Click to expand...


Funny, i've experienced one or rmore of these characteristics in almost all of the "debunkers" posting here. Some corrections to the order of commonness:

1. Arrogant
2. Gullible
3. Uninformed
4. Imaginative
5. Mentally ill
6. Paranoid
7. Impractical
8. Unintelligent
9. Uneducated
10. Unemployed (usually i don't ask)

@DGM: Yes, now i get it. You mean Bush, Cheney and cohorts! These people indeed suck.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Funny, i've experienced one or rmore of these characteristics in almost all of the "debunkers" posting here. Some corrections to the order of commonness:

1. Arrogant
2. Gullible
3. Uninformed
4. Imaginative
5. Mentally ill
6. Paranoid
7. Impractical
8. Unintelligent
9. Uneducated
10. Unemployed (usually i don't ask)

@DGM: Yes, now i get it. You mean Bush, Cheney and cohorts! These people indeed suck.
Click to expand...

Actually you will find that many posters here are engineers and/or scientists, while very few truthers are either.

You will also find that many posters here have expertise/education in areas that are directly relevant to 9/11, while very few truthers have any such education or expertise.

In fact I assume that you are neither an engineer nor a scientist, so your analysis or opinion on science and engineering really doesn't matter to me unless you show competence in these areas. You haven't, so I just tend to shrug you off and roll my eyes.

Repeating my list is really not relevant since you have not shown yourself in your posts to be someone who is capable of doing an intelligent analysis on anything really. This is the case with most truthers. This is why most scientists and engineers just ignore you.....cause your opinions, views, and comments simply don't matter or carry weight.
 
Yeah, that's the problem. You assume too much. If i would tell you that i'm indeed an engineer and/or scientist, you wouldn't believe me anyway. Not that it would matter for anything else but controlled demolition discussions.

FYI: We're watching you trapped in your web of little labels and poke fun at you.
 
So, what are your qualifications CE?? Please post them here. I will take you at your word untill you prove otherwise.

BTW, I have some qualifications. Not as impressive as some others, but certainly more than most of the TM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom