Another very excitng letter from Richard Gage. Watch them circle the wagons. The Injuns are gonna win this one boys ...sure as eggs is eggs.
Marvin J. Malecha, FAIA
President, American Institute of Architects
1735 New York Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006-5292
July 20, 2009
Re: Response to July 1, 2009 Letter “Decline of request to meet with the Board”
Dear Mr. Malecha,
It is with great regret that I read in your letter the decline of our request to meet with you and the AIA Board. We wrote to you that we now have over 700 architects and engineers at AE911Truth calling for a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. Now, as a result of our latest successful exhibit booth and class at the Washington DC conference last week we have over 45 AIA members signed on.
At what point will you take us seriously? Perhaps when our rapidly growing numbers reach 1,000 ?
You note that “We believe that the NIST investigation and the resulting NIST report are valid and credible.” But how can they possibly be valid and credible when:
1. NIST’s November 2009 Final WTC 7 Investigative Report has many fatal flaws:
a. NIST is forced to acknowledge the free-fall collapse of Building 7 for 100 feet of its 6.5 second fall, only after being grilled publicly by experts who are petition signers of AE911Truth. Yet they do not acknowledge the obvious implications of such free-fall collapse – that the structure had to have been removed – forcibly – by explosives. (Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural steel – because all of it’s gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion.)
b. NIST falsifies evidence of fires on the critical 12th floor (video and photos document that the fires had burned at least an hour before collapse – at the theorized area of collapse initiation).
c. NIST simply eliminates the evidence of melted steel documented thoroughly in Appendix C of the former FEMA BPAT report: “Rapid oxidation, intergranular melting, sulfidation… evaporation of steel.” These processes are simply not possible with “normal office fires” which NIST cites as the cause of this building’s unprecedented catastrophic failure. (See notes below for temperature comparisons.)
d. NIST’s computer simulations of WTC 7 look nothing like the straight-down symmetrical collapse seen in all of the videos. The animations reveal the building top “folding in on itself” – then the simulation is actually stopped - only half way through – at the point at which the model appears to begin to behave like a natural process of collapse – asymetricallly – falling...
read full letter:-
http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/Letter_to_AIA_-_Melacha-_7-19-09a.pdf
