Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
I thought I rememberd a discussion where I calculated that the plane entered the building from nose to tail in about one-fifth of a second and T. agreed with me more or less. Then I showed that the plane had flown it's final body length prior to entering the building also in about one-fifth of a second. Does that make T a no-planer ? You tell me.
Click to expand...

You thought you remembered ... about 1/5th .... more or less ... about 1/5th.
It makes you a weasel.
 
bill smith said:
I've seen it before and was looking for a copy. Thanks. Does it look like it went through a wall of steel, then about 10 massive core columns and then out through another wall of steel to you ? 1mm aluminium > I mean do you think that makes sense ?
Click to expand...


You've been caught lying again. There was no "wall of steel." Nobody thinks there was. The plane, as you know, cut several perimeter columns and smashed through windows.

You, of course, ran away from the thread where you were directed to MAckey's lecture. You are avoiding telling us what the NASA engineer gets wrong. Your guru can't help you, Bill, because he is an incompetent buffoon.
 
GlennB said:
Provide your analysis, or a link to it. Your stupendously vague recollections carry no weight.
Click to expand...

Lighten up Glenn. Life is not so bad that you have to let it ruin your life. Ask T. He is the one who has those posts at his fingertips.
 
What about this one ?

The first bird may get the worm but it's the second mouse who gets the cheese in the trap.
Click to expand...
All your statements are false; use some logic

Why are you the first mouse?

11111mousetrap.jpg

Or was it the sixth?
 
Last edited:
There's an option which completely hides his posts while he's under ignore (and some very annoying people like JihadJane). That makes threads a lot cleaner, but it's quite disturbing to see quoted posts taken out of nowhere :D
 
I guess I could see how that could be misinterpreted.
I was implying that a truther running for mayor would have a hard time beating the undies guy.
 
Toke said:
Would you mind presenting the highlights?
Click to expand...

You should listen. Greening has things to say about both sides. One thing I can say is that I'm really glad I liistened to the interview because now I believe that Greening might be clean...though he did co-author one of he Bazant papers.
 
Last edited:
So he does not bring up any specific wrongs. And you do not have any coherent teori on 9/11.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom