• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CONNIE SONNE, Dowser

Hi Connie,
I would like to ask you a very simple question.
Have you ever asked a friend to place a small object under a sealed can (or a card inside a sealed envelope) and have a bunch more of these empty cans (or envelopes) and tried to dowse for that object having your friend out of the room or standing at the corner of the room behind you (so you don't see him/her)?
If so, how well did you do on this test? It's a very simple test to do and takes minutes at most.

Thank you.
 
Dear Yairhol....no, I did something much better for one year ago...in " the beginning". When I should show my parents for the first time ever...I placed the hole alphabet on cards on the table in front of me. My dad mixed the cards, And lying on the table with the backside up, I could`nt see anything. Without one failure...I wrote his name. I convinced my parents, and they have the connections too.
Best regards Connie
 
Connie Sonne does not need to ask anybody and she doesn't need to test herself, yairhol! She has the "connections"!
I can dowse through envelopes or whatever...it dosn`t matter at all. You can even build the cards in a cementwall...I find them anyway.

And finaly about the question about dowsing....what about leaving the question for "how to do it" for JREF and myself? I know what I can do..and surely JREF know what they are doing to. It`s only "a matter " between me and them..noone else...yet!;)
But I don`t need anybody to help me, and I don`t have to read about this. I do know how to do, whom it is and why.
Thank`s for your advice, but as I wrote before, I do not have to practice, and I don`t have problems at all, :).
When you say you don't have to read about what Dann linked to, is that because:
a) you already know about these things and don't think they apply to you
or
b) is it because you simply don't bother?
Is it a or b?
CFLarsen, yes, the answer to both questions a and b are yes. I already knows about these things and it dosnt apply to me and yes, I don`t bother, :)
Hi Chran and thank you,:).It`s ok. But I am serious when I say, that I do know what I can. Really...there is no problem, :). But I also know, that many people around have tried the challenge, but it did`nt work out. It will this time...when I am so sure, it`s because I know who my connections are, what they can and what they allow me to do, :). And there is a meaning about this, because afterwards....much more will come..the truth about everything, I promise,:).
Jackalgirl and Yairhol, where it all comes from, there`s a lot of humor. If it will happen, that I fail the test..there`s a reason. Then I will make the new step afterwards, not by testing again, but something else..Yeah, no matter what is going to happen, I will never make a doubt about my abilities. In a year now, my life and the things I`m doing is like a puzzle, but ALWAYS I do the new step to go on...and I already have many evidences and more will come,:).
And for Dann, God dosn`t excist...there is something else. It`s not about belief or faith, it`s about knowing, Our planet is ready for the truth only now, therefore other people couldn`t come through the challenge...they were not allowed to. And about the lectures...yes, a lot of it...it`s a waste of time, and some of it only contains "the half truth".
(...)
I did answer your questions, and I can`t see right now, that I have to write more about it, than I did. As I wrote earlier, there`s comming much more, and when that will take place, you wil get your answers,:).
You must also know, that NOTHING can keep me away from what I`m doing, eventhough someone are trying to convince me, that I`m wrong:D!
(...)
And for GzuzKryzt. I`m not contradicting myself...I know a lot....and you don`t know what I know:) So I appologize if you think I`m contradicting...but I`m not...I explain it afterwards the challenge.
hi there, a quick answer, specially for Dann....First...you misunderstood about barking.... I will stop BARKING myself....not that I will do my selftest:). I know a lot lot more than you do...It`s not ONLY about dowsing...that`s only a little part of it- I havent told you anything about other things, and I will not do it now:). First the challenge, and again, as I told you....much more will come,:D! Think what you want....I don`t care at all,:)
 
For all people out there....about dowsing, it`s only a little part of it, as I told you before. Dowsing could be my first step to prove that I´m right. It`s NOT about faith or believing in "something". It`s much more simple than people think...and that`s very good:). It has never ment to bee religion in this...at all:).
When you don`t have the evidences of something...you are a "believer" or a "claimer". But when you have the evidences on what`s going on, I mean real evidences you really can hold in your hands....then you are a "knower". And a "knower" = science :). And now I`m talking about what`s going on in the world, the Madeleine Mccanncase, what`s behind us all and so on. I´t`s all connected.

Best regards Connie
 
”Sagen er den, at alting hænger sammen, Maddie er blot en lille brik i denneher sammenhæng. Det jeg taler om er MEGA stort og berører rent faktisk folk globalt. Hvis jeg havde fået Maddie ud, hvilket jeg forøvrigt prøvede på alene nogle gange, så ville jeg ALDRIG have opdaget de andre ting.

Det er ligesom et puslespil, jeg skal gøre/opdage nogle ting, før nogle andre ting sker...for altså at komme videre. Ved godt, at det kan være svært at forstå. Maddie KOMMER ud, men først når rette tid kommer....så kan jeg love, at en "bombe" vil springe. Jeg har beviser for en hel masse, men tingene skal først samles, og det er det jeg er ved...så selv om der er tavshed....så vent blot...det kommer...verdens befolkning har ret til sandheden, sandheden omkring alt muligt...og den rigtige sandhed...ikke alle de løgne og fordrejninger vi alle bliver udsat for i hverdagen.”

http://para-nyt.blogspot.com/2008/10/vi-venter-stadig-connie.html

”The fact is that everything is connected, Maddie is just a small piece of the puzzle in this context. What I’m talking about is MEGA big and actually concerns people on a global scale. If I had managed to get Maddie out, which, by the way, I tried to do alone a couple of times, I would NEVER have discovered the other things.
It is like a puzzle, I have to do/discover certain things before other things happen … in order to get further. I know that it can be hard to understand. Maddie WILL come out, but not until the right time …. I can promise that a “bomb” will then go off. I have proof of a lot of things, but first they have to be put together, and that is what I’m doing…so even if there is silence….just wait and see…it will come…the population of the world is entitled to know the truth, the truth about all kinds of things…and the real truth…not all the lies and distortions that we are exposed to in our everyday lives.” October 27, 2008
 
Dear Yairhol....no, I did something much better for one year ago...in " the beginning". When I should show my parents for the first time ever...I placed the hole alphabet on cards on the table in front of me. My dad mixed the cards, And lying on the table with the backside up, I could`nt see anything. Without one failure...I wrote his name. I convinced my parents, and they have the connections too.
Best regards Connie

Wow! that IS most impressive.
Simple math shows that the probability of doing that without any mistakes, given a 26 letter alphabet and an N letter name: (1/26)^N

if his name is made up of 2 letters -> 0.14%
if his name is made up of 3 letters -> 0.00569%
if his name is made up of 4 letters -> 0.000219%
if his name is made up of 5 letters -> 0.0000084%

Well done Connie.

Have you done more tests like that?

Thanks.
 
Wow! that IS most impressive.
Simple math shows that the probability of doing that without any mistakes, given a 26 letter alphabet and an N letter name: (1/26)^N

if his name is made up of 2 letters -> 0.14%
if his name is made up of 3 letters -> 0.00569%
if his name is made up of 4 letters -> 0.000219%
if his name is made up of 5 letters -> 0.0000084%

Well done Connie.

Have you done more tests like that?

Thanks.

If she can do that with letter cards created and placed by the JREF examiner, then I think that's a protocol.
 
I agree.

Connie should have asked for this protocol since she already knows that she can succeed with such a test.
 
CFLarsen said:
The Danish alphabet has 29 letters.

Are you sure those extra 3 letters are not redundant? Don't be greedy. 26 letter should be more than enough for the Danish.
 
yairhol, I did wrote other possibilities, and I asked to do more than the protocoled test, but they told me, that if I got trough the test, I would have the chance to show more. So that`s ok:). And yes, I have done a lot more, but I dont have the time right now for telling about it, but it will co´me:)
 
One way of writing the Danish character 'ø' is by writing 'oe'. However, it fails with a word like 'sukkerroer', where 'sukkerrør' means sugar canes, whereas 'sukkerroer' means sugar beets. In a sentence like 'Denmark gets most of its sugar from ...', not even the context will be of assistance!

Nope, we need all our letters!
 
Dear Yairhol....no, I did something much better for one year ago...in " the beginning". When I should show my parents for the first time ever...I placed the hole alphabet on cards on the table in front of me. My dad mixed the cards, And lying on the table with the backside up, I could`nt see anything. Without one failure...I wrote his name. I convinced my parents, and they have the connections too.
Best regards Connie

I do not believe you when you tell me that you wrote your father's name out of an alphabet of cards without one failure by using paranormal powers. There are a lot of possible mundane explanations which would be too long to list here.

Bottom line: I do not believe you can do this. I do believe though that you are very likely fooling yourself. But since you are unwilling to read up on the issues e.g. CFLarsen has suggested, you cannot be convinced of a possible mundane explanation for the phenomenon you claim.

You can convince me of your claim(s) by succeeding in a controlled test e.g. for the MDC.
 
hi Dann.....ohh humor, I love that:D!
And for GzuzKrytz.....I don`t care what you believe in:)..I just answered the question, that`s all...I have told you all the time....the test no more else right now:). It feels like you have some pain in your ash:D!
 
Connie, we should all care what everyone believes. By that I mean that we should all be humble enough to think that anyone, no matter whether they seem kindly or angry, may be able to teach us something. We are all connected, and everyone has some wisdom, and we all have something to learn.

You should really look at what Gzuzkryzt has to say, and really take it to heart, and then you can responsibly accept it or reject it. Can you say that you have done that?
 
*snip*
Telling her to go ahead and wishing her luck is cynical!

PS Do you guys actually believe in the good luck that you wish Connie Sonne? Or are you just putting a good face on it?

Well, if nobody had tried to give her advice, it would indeed be cynical. However, advice has been offered (also politely), but Connie has waved it off (in a rather flippant way, if you ask me).

She has also stated her absolute determination with doing the trial, and sh has said that she can make the protocol with the JREF.

So, fine! All there is left is to wish good luck.

Yes, I certainly mean it. I don't mean that I wish she will succeed, because I find that very unlikely, but I wish her a good and constructive experience. (I doubt that also, but that's another matter)

Hans
 

Back
Top Bottom