• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Common Sense

Hey you 3837383 38383746... you think on 9/11 - with the knowledge of terrorists attacks... that these rescue workers.. when told there were bombs in the building... should have been like - damn INSIDE JOB!

These workers probably never even thought twice about those events... they were told to evacuate the area... and they simply did their jobs - like heros... not terrorists.

P.S. People in the truth movement can't even get any mainstream media to show the video of WTC 7 collapsing (minus one time) ... but you think they would have a firefighter on who claims he was told bombs were in WTC 7 building? The media wouldn't... for one - because they only have these "CTist" on, to show the public how they should be viewed (character assassination) i.e. crazies on the fringe of society - you really think they would want to paint one of the 9/11 heros like that? No, they wouldn't... thus they would never have one on that claimed the official story is a lie.

So if you went up to any of these firefighters today would they say "Yep there was a bomb in the building"?

Aslo if there were bombs why were they so quiet? A couple of videos showing CD's have been posted with the sound of the charges going off and for some reason there are no sounds of charges going off at the WTC.
 
Hey you 3837383 38383746... you think on 9/11 - with the knowledge of terrorists attacks... that these rescue workers.. when told there were bombs in the building... should have been like - damn INSIDE JOB!

These workers probably never even thought twice about those events... they were told to evacuate the area... and they simply did their jobs - like heros... not terrorists.

P.S. People in the truth movement can't even get any mainstream media to show the video of WTC 7 collapsing (minus one time) ... but you think they would have a firefighter on who claims he was told bombs were in WTC 7 building? The media wouldn't... for one - because they only have these "CTist" on, to teach the public how they should be viewed (character assassination) i.e. crazies on the fringe of society - you really think they would want to paint one of the 9/11 heros like that? No, they wouldn't... thus they would never have one on that claimed the official story is a lie.
and after 9/11 when the reports said there were no bombs they all said "wait a minute, yes their were, we all knew about them and heard them. we should start a organization to get to the bottom of this"

oh wait, no they didnt...
 
Didn't you just say that the firefighter said there was a bomb... and now you're saying that he didn't know there was one?

You can't have your cake and eat it, mate.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?

I'm biting my tongue on this one... the firefighters were obviously told by their superiors that bombs were in WTC 7... OKAY? You with me so far? NOW... how does that mean they knew about the plot of 9/11? They were simply taking orders and doing their job.

Erf9iuehfnpnfgpareu god, still biting tongue... stupidity is such a pet peeve of mine. Lord... throw me a line... pleasssssssssssssssssssse!
 
P.S. People in the truth movement can't even get any mainstream media to show the video of WTC 7 collapsing (minus one time) ... but you think they would have a firefighter on who claims he was told bombs were in WTC 7 building? The media wouldn't... for one - because they only have these "CTist" on, to teach the public how they should be viewed (character assassination) i.e. crazies on the fringe of society - you really think they would want to paint one of the 9/11 heros like that? No, they wouldn't... thus they would never have one on that claimed the official story is a lie.

You saying the BBC, or TF1 in France, or Al-Jazeera wouldn't run an interview? That The Guardian, or the Independent, or Le Monde, or any of the major newspapers in China or India or Pakistan wouldn't run that interview?

Hell, you don't even need a major news corp. You think this fire-fighter, with first hand knowledge of bombs in WTC7, wouldn't even make a freaking You-Tube video?!
 
People in the truth movement can't even get any mainstream media to show the video of WTC 7 collapsing

And if the media shows it let's hope they turn the volume way up so we can all hear those deafening bombs going off.

Then they should show a REAL demolition so viewers can see and hear the difference.
 
the firefighters were obviously told by their superiors that bombs were in WTC 7... OKAY? You with me so far? NOW... how does that mean they knew about the plot of 9/11? They were simply taking orders and doing their job.

So they KNEW there were bombs in WTC7 but they can't connect that to a demolition plot?

Good lord!
 
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHAT?

I'm biting my tongue on this one... the firefighters were obviously told by their superiors that bombs were in WTC 7... OKAY? You with me so far? NOW... how does that mean they knew about the plot of 9/11? They were simply taking orders and doing their job.

Erf9iuehfnpnfgpareu god, still biting tongue... stupidity is such a pet peeve of mine. Lord... throw me a line... pleasssssssssssssssssssse!

Let me get this straight, as obviously I'm too stupid to understand the logic of your argument (I'm working on a PhD, so please don't tell my supervisor your superior intellect floored me, else I'll get failed!),

1) There were bombs in WTC7
2) Firefighters saw and / or were told there were bombs
3) They accepted this, without questioning it
4) Once the "official story" came out, that there weren't any bombs, not one of those firefighters, in the intervening 5 years, has mentioned this to anyone?
5) Furthermore, despite not telling anyone, they're not "in on it".

Is that what you're saying?

Excuse me, I'm stupid.
 
28th....what kind of bomb do you think was in WTC7?

I'm trying to figure out what kind of bomb could bring down a building and not make a sound.

Any ideas?
 
I'm biting my tongue on this one... the firefighters were obviously told by their superiors that bombs were in WTC 7... OKAY? You with me so far? NOW... how does that mean they knew about the plot of 9/11? They were simply taking orders and doing their job.
So, if I may paraphrase, you're accusing the firefighters of complicity in 9/11. They have evidence, but they've refused to talk about it.
 
and after 9/11 when the reports said there were no bombs they all said "wait a minute, yes their were, we all knew about them and heard them. we should start a organization to get to the bottom of this"

oh wait, no they didnt...

Oh wait... you don't live in the real world... you live in a virtual world of speculation. I live in the real world, where I only use REAL physical evidence i.e. VIDEO FOOTAGE OF FIREFIGHTERS SAYING BOMBS WERE IN THE WTC 7 - to piece my case together.... you on the other hand... use myopic reasoning... generated from naive beliefs and limited imagination - to form your theories.
 
and of course, of the firefighters who have survived, and many whom retired since 9/11, not one .. .NOT one single one of them have "outed" that their superiors told them to keep quiet about.

Sorry, but I dont think that the measley pension they get is enough for them to keep quiet about it.
 
Oh wait... you don't live in the real world... you live in a virtual world of speculation. I live in the real world, where I only use REAL physical evidence i.e. VIDEO FOOTAGE OF FIREFIGHTERS SAYING BOMBS WERE IN THE WTC 7 - to piece my case together.... you on the other hand... use myopic reasoning... generated from naive beliefs and limited imagination - to form your theories.

For the nth time...

http://911myths.com/html/accounts_of_explosions.html

These accounts were from the immediate aftermath. Has any firefighter (on YouTube or elsewhere) said since then that they saw, or were told, there were bombs? Have they?

If not, why not?
 
I apologize guys... but, I have to put some more of you on ignore... because I will be suspended or banned... if I have to continue reading this mindless drivel. I mean really... this level of willful ignorance is sinful.
 
28th....what kind of bomb do you think was in WTC7?

I'm trying to figure out what kind of bomb could bring down a building and not make a sound.

Any ideas?

619745a581c46ea10.jpg
 
I apologize guys... but, I have to put some more of you on ignore... because I will be suspended or banned... if I have to continue reading this mindless drivel. I mean really... this level of willful ignorance is sinful.


you are nothing more than a troll and sooner people realize this, that you are not here to debate, but to admonish, the sooner that they will stop replying to you.
 
Yay! Do I get to be on ignore now too? Before you even helped me get over my stupidity?

How am I gonna get my PhD now?


----

I think eventually he'll have every single member of the forums on ignore at this rate, and will just be posting to himself!
 
I apologize guys... but, I have to put some more of you on ignore... because I will be suspended or banned... if I have to continue reading this mindless drivel. I mean really... this level of willful ignorance is sinful.

28th: What kind of bomb was in WTC7? Why no sound?

Enlighten me, oh wise one.
 
you know what gets me, is that if everything was left to "common sense" then why do Doctors/engineers/lawyers/judges/put your profession in this space all spend $$$$ to go to school, then XXXX amount of time in hands on experience which is more $$$ spent, when all people have to do is hire Joe Schmoe and his "common" sense to do that job?

someone who isn't ignored by 28IQ, ask him if he's willing to see someone about heart bypass surgery by Joe Schmoe and have him perform it (by use of "common sense") or would he go to someone specialized in Heart bypass surgery to have them perform it.
 
Oh wait... you don't live in the real world... you live in a virtual world of speculation. I live in the real world, where I only use REAL physical evidence i.e. VIDEO FOOTAGE OF FIREFIGHTERS SAYING BOMBS WERE IN THE WTC 7 - to piece my case together.... you on the other hand... use myopic reasoning... generated from naive beliefs and limited imagination - to form your theories.
maybe its just in my virtual world, but i think over 5 years have passed since that video was taken, and in that time the official story has stated no bombs were in WTC7, and i dont think that firefighter has made any public case to make it known that there were bombs

why is this? what does he have to hide?

the firefighters were obviously told by their superiors that bombs were in WTC 7... OKAY? You with me so far? NOW... how does that mean they knew about the plot of 9/11? They were simply taking orders and doing their job.
so how did the firefighters superiors (who are also firefighters BTW) know there were bombs? at some point someone must have firsthand knowledge of explosive devices, and since they havent mentioned in the 5 years since i woudl say they have some explaining to do
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom