Rolfe
Adult human female
Coalition in Westminster
- Thread starter Rolfe
- Start date
fagin
Philosopher
Pragmatic
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
commandlinegamer
Philosopher
This caught my eye
"We will examine the balance of the EU’s existing competences and will, in particular, work to limit the application of the Working Time Directive in the United Kingdom."
Hmm. Does it mean junior doctors going back to 80 hours a week?
Great news though on scrapping the ID card scheme, and libel review (though that was belatedly on Labour sights also).
High speed rail networks were also announced by the previous government, but I think they're a long way off.
"We will examine the balance of the EU’s existing competences and will, in particular, work to limit the application of the Working Time Directive in the United Kingdom."
Hmm. Does it mean junior doctors going back to 80 hours a week?
Great news though on scrapping the ID card scheme, and libel review (though that was belatedly on Labour sights also).
High speed rail networks were also announced by the previous government, but I think they're a long way off.
Half a loaf is better than no bread. Alternatively, "politics is the art of the possible." The Lib Dems will come out considerably ahead under AV, which makes this a typical political compromise. No one gets everything they want, everyone gets something they want.
If the Lib Dems had held out for immediate full PR, they would simply have gained nothing out of this parliament....
Rockingham AH Deist
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2010
- Messages
- 99
The Libdems have sold their soul. They have won virtually no concessions, just promises to "consider" things such as AV and scrapping trident. We all know what "consider" means.
Ok, not entirely nothing. Cuts for inheritance and married couple taxes have been blocked, and a shift of plane taxation from per plane to per passenger has been promised. Encroachments upon civil liberties will be reversed, or so they say.
Not entirely nothing, but depressingly little. Vote Labour, next time round.
Ok, not entirely nothing. Cuts for inheritance and married couple taxes have been blocked, and a shift of plane taxation from per plane to per passenger has been promised. Encroachments upon civil liberties will be reversed, or so they say.
Not entirely nothing, but depressingly little. Vote Labour, next time round.
Small Town Jesus
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- May 22, 2003
- Messages
- 286
At the next election, assuming the Tories & the Libs are no longer in coalition, the LibDems will be in the interesting position of having to campaign against their own government record.
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
It gains them a more-or-less guaranteed balance of power in the next set of negotiations to form a coalition government, in which they can use their continued leverage to get more of their preferred policies adopted. It'll also protect them from the perception that a LibDem vote is a wasted vote, because anyone who wants to keep out the Conservatives can simply list Labour as second choice and Monster Raving Loony as third, and get the same effect.
Dave
richardm
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Messages
- 9,248
They're still going to starve to death on that half loaf, though; I don't think they're going to come out much better off under AV anyway, but particularly because:
Dave Rogers said:
The idea that Labour voters might vote Lib Dem tactically in future is likely to fall on very stony ground indeed, if the first time they get within a sniff of power they side with the Tories.
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
I kind of hope people realise that it was a bit more complex than that. How was any other coalition apart from Labour/Conservative going to survive its first contentious vote? The choice before the LibDems wasn't between siding with Labour or siding with the Conservatives, it was between a government and a mess.
And all this is predicated on the black-and-white, politics-as-a-football-match thinking that's the bane of any kind of consensus thinking in this country. As a nation, we need to grow up a bit.
Dave
richardm
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Messages
- 9,248
Well, the Tories could have set up a minority government and worked on consensus for individual issues. That seems to be working tolerably well in Scotland. They didn't have to forge a coalition at any cost in order to do this, and the Lib Dems certainly didn't need to support them.
Edit again: I have no idea what I was driving at with this sentence, so I've killed it.
Last edited:
Left and right are misleading labels when talking of the modern parties front benches and policies. Backbench torys tend to be centre-right to mid-right, back bench labour mid-left to far left and backbench lib-dem tend to be centre to centre-left, but front benches of each have a mix of policies.
Lib-dems and torys have a surprising amount in common, particularly when it comes to the less "blue sky thinking" lib-dem policies.
I agree and think this could be a genuine "all star" government, with Lib Dems and the Tory's each curbing the others worst excesses - toff-tax-break tendancies, euroscepticism (to a happy median of sceptical cooperation hopefully), environmental policies ("clean" coal is a joke, but nuclear is necessary) etc.
They also have near identical schools policies and hopefully Lib-dem university policy will prevail. Torys have better grasp of reality in terms of economics, but will benefit from some the Lib-Dem initiatives.
Basically, PROVIDED they dont descend into bickering and keep their eye on the prize this could be an incredible government.
Blair and Bush had many of the same weaknesses, and Blair was too busy sucking up to do much curbing. I dont think you'll see that problem with Cleggster.
We've had coalition governments for the last umpteen years. Both Labour and Conservatives are coalitions of people with widely divergent views (Blair/Brown, Major/Eurosceptics, Maggie/"Wets" ). In the end enlightened self interest makes them work and I suspect it will be the same this time.
Steve
Steve
Cleon
King of the Pod People
I think the LibDems know full well this coalition will fall apart in a few months, and all the "concessions" they made to the Tories was nothing more than stall time while they prepare for the next election.
If the Tories are smart, they'll realize this too.
If the Tories are smart, they'll realize this too.
Yogzotot
Scholar
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 112
As German living (happily!) in the UK, I am still amazed about the British's reluctance for something like ID cards, or a proper residence registration system, while they are happy to live in the most CCTV-observed country in the world and have a heightened fear of identity theft.
I'm not happy about those either.
Jaggy Bunnet
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 16, 2003
- Messages
- 6,241
It is going to need more than that. Add up the Tories and the 20 LibDems who are members of the government and you have a majority given that SF won't take their seats.
So it would need all of the Lib Dem backbenchers plus either some Tories or some Lib Dem's willing to resign from government for the coalition to actually lose a vote.
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
I think the Lib Dems have been the party of opposition for so long that now they actually have some real power they don't know what the hell to do.