• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CIT/Air America Debate Challenge

Ron Is On!
"FULL BLOWN NUTTER"
Oh man this is going to be sweet!
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
But wait your drone fantasy is like Framer, over thinking and pure dumb ideas stuff.
That is pure dumb. The idea the drone was under the wires a few feet above her car; on the same day as 93 impacts and a Falcon 20 is asked to look! You lack facts, you lack evidence. Good job, expert witnesses investigator.
Under wires. Good for you. You have taken 9/11 events and found pure stupid ideas, and you use other people to hide behind.

You do not need an aviation expert to know your ideas are pure fantasy. Non-paths, 11.2 Gs, math and physics errors! What next?

The people saw a Falcon 20 on 9/11. You have turned it into a drone flying under wires. Your paranoid ideas are not even good fiction.
Click to expand...

I have evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

How many eyewitnesses to this plane do you require before you acknowledge the people of Shanksville are good honest Americans?

no one saw a Falcon 20. Please name me what witnesses corroborate your unsubstantiated claims of a Falcon 20.

I'll be awaiting a list of their names so i can independently verify them on film.
 
Perfect opening salvo Ron.

Perfect. I hope they allow to you continue later...
 
You do realize that eyewitness testimony is the weakest form of evidence due to its unreliability right? It's only ever used as a last resort.
 
Dom,
We are in the middle of what will be A SLAUGHTER of your boy Craig.
Can you please take your OT business and start another thread?
Thank you!
 
Damn, I missed Ron because i'm not allowed to smoke in the house and had to skulk outside, what did he say?
 
WTF? 152 witnesses is not enough to determine whether a plane crashed into a building.

This guy is on crack.
 
theauthor said:
Never heard of Barbera Honegger but she is talking complete crap. Computer screens blew up????
Click to expand...
http://www.nps.edu/cebrowski/denning.html

Does she work for the DoD? She said the SecDef murdered people at the Pentagon.

Who wants a person who is spreading lies to work for you? Write the Naval Postgraduate School.

She basically said the government blew up people in the Pentagon minutes before 77 impacts. In addition, she said this was done to hide some accounting problems and covering for the SecDef. Does she work for you? Pushing lies about 9/11 is terrible. I wrote to the school. I can not beleive she told people who she worked for.
 
DRG is such a fraud, just pushing his book! He is pure hearsay! All hearsay.


WRONG, not all NTSB reports have serial numbers for FDR~! BIG error.
 
Last edited:
Is DRG stuck in 2005 or something? It's like a travel back through time in the old outdated conspiracy claims...
 
JamesB said:
WTF? 152 witnesses is not enough to determine whether a plane crashed into a building.

This guy is on crack.
Click to expand...

Hopefully, Ron will ask them about the statements of the many hundreds of people who were inside the Pentagon and recovered the wreckage and bodies.

Not to speak of the very open sorting of the wreckage on the Pentagon lawn.
 
Hani was better than p4t pilots - what an idiot

and his instructor said he could hit the Pentagon

DRG is hearsay, impossible, what a crock of crap

brain cancer? stand down? lol ; buy my book, i need money, i am too dumb to do anything but take money from suckers
 
Last edited:
untrue, it is all untrue

do not say lie (even the host can not handle the truth)

say untrue

p4t next, the evidence is going into special physics and math
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom