• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Chopper 5 Velocity Study Proves Video Composite, Reveals Sloppy Photoshopping

saywhat.jpg


PS - Photoshop doesn't do video.
 
Great. Now you've only got about forty other camera angles which recorded the impact to prove are fakes. After you've managed that, then you can move on to proving what thousands of eyewitnesses saw was fake.

Good luck with that.
 
So your thesis is that the airplane must have passed behind the tower, because you can see part of it coming out the other side? Man, it sure would be nice to check out your idea by having another video taken from a different angle. It's too bad that this crappy video is the only one we have of the South Tower impact.

Oh, the "pixel halo" around the object is just a compression artifact. Sorry.

And, the formatting of your web page overlaps several of the paragraphs and paragraph section headings.
 
... Even if you were right (which you're not) There are a helluva lot of other videos out there and all you will have proven is 1 chopper cam faked the vid with photoshop.

Also you wouldn't be here because you would have figured out a way to fake video with photoshop and would be very rich enjoying you cash.
 
Ace,

What is the source for the video you used?

-Gumboot
 
TS1234, You might want to change the title to "Velocity Study of Chopper 5 video...". The way you're wording it, it sounds like the people of Chopper 5 did the study themselves.

Of course, you haven't done it correctly yourself, but we don't need to stretch the credit (read "blame") unfairly.
 
Truthseeker,

Are you calling all the eyewitnesses who say they saw an actual plane hit the towers liars? Are you saying ALL of the videos of flight 175 striking the tower were faked? Are you that freaking delusional?

Why don't you do a little investigating as to where the 2948 confirmed dead 9/11 victims are buried and just spit on their graves? Jerk.
 
Last edited:
"Photoshopping" is a generic term for "digital photography manipulation". It's possible they removed the backgrounds with Photoshop/Image Ready, but it needn't be so.
 
"Photoshopping" is a generic term for "digital photography manipulation". It's possible they removed the backgrounds with Photoshop/Image Ready, but it needn't be so.
I know someone who saw the plane hit the building, they even could see it was United. Darn, all your work a big giant waste of time. So sad for you; but you have to be the most challenged person I have see post junk about 9/11. You are not very good an anything to do with 9/11. But you seem to be persistent. Like a repeat offender.
 
"Photoshopping" is a generic term for "digital photography manipulation". It's possible they removed the backgrounds with Photoshop/Image Ready, but it needn't be so.

you dont know wtf you are talking about

one, you can't do "photoshopping" in video, especially video being done LIVE in front of millions of people and of course WHO was there and witnessed it first hand


your article is an embarassmetn to those who work with these tools on a daily basis, and shows your ignorance and of course your non-expertise on the subjet.

your article wouldn't even be worth putting against those experts who frequently post to worth1000.com ... before attempting to discredit the millions of professional digital imagers and editors out there, you might want to get their opinions on it


As for video, what you want to look for is gREen SCREENINg. can you point out any witness that noticed a 3 mile wide, 1 mile tall green screen?


sorry, for got my lolcat


youzwrongzvv2.jpg

 
Last edited:
You assert that this video was intentionally faked, right?

At the risk of being redundant at pointing out what others have already said let me simply note a few key points that would have to be true for the government to pull something like this off.

All of the videos would have to be faked. The ones that were shown live would have had to been faked before the event plus every single 'home-grown' video that surfaced would have had to have been faked.

Even if such a daunting task were possible how on earth could ANY entity suppress every single video taken of this event. Think of the population around this area. Who knows how many videos cameras and cell phones were pointed at this event. No government could even know who was filming and who was not, much less track them all down.

This is not to mention the tens of thousands of tourists that legally travel between the US and hostile states on a daily basis. Am I to presume that Custom agents sit down and watch every minute of every 2 hour video that leaves this country? Of course not.

To believe that all of the videos could be doctored is absurd.

To believe, in an age of the World Wide Web and mass communications where a short clip could be sent by cell phone to any part of the world an instant after it was taken, that any clips that do not correspond to what is commonly available were either not taken or somehow suppressed is absurd beyond belief.

You have a mountain of clips showing planes hitting the buildings and zero ( as in 0, nada, zip, zilch ) showing anything to the contrary.

I am sorely unimpressed by your colorful charts and displays.
 
I only have one thing to add to this thread: Why?

Why do you make this stuff up, Ace and why do you think anyone would believe it?
 

Back
Top Bottom