Alferd_Packer
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
- Messages
- 8,746
Nobody asks permission to drive cars, either, and cars have always polluted.
My respects to your father on his service. He must have some interesting stories to tell (assuming that he's ever spoken about his experiences).
The B-17 is probably my second favourite aircraft of WWII.
Mmmm. Tasty! And it's still warm, too!
Did you ever think that they don't??People who believe this crap must live a miserable life to be so far removed from reality. I honestly don't understand how someone who believes this garbage can sleep at night.
And now for my flippin'ly dumb, yet serious question:
If the purpose of chemtrails is to spray humans, as so many sites claim, why do we see so many over the ocean?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1238647ad490553938.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1238647ad49050d06e.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1238647ad48ee1e607.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1238647ad48ee3ab16.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1238647ad48edef5d9.jpg[/qimg]
I mean, this doesn't matter if the "hypothesis"is that chemtrails exist for weather control (be happy that none of you can hear the *SNORT* as I type that), but to me, this does demonstrate how ridiculous any of the "biological warfare" or "mind control" chemtrail woo is. Why waste so much payload over open water?
Exactly! Weather or climate control is not necessarily nefarious. The very real problem that arises is the short term and the long term effect the chemical's have on humans. Does the public have a right to know what might happen to them as a result of such chemicals?
I don't agree with the mind control/bio warfare/ population reduction excuse but the health effects should be a concern.
Exactly! Weather or climate control is not necessarily nefarious. The very real problem that arises is the short term and the long term effect the chemical's have on humans. Does the public have a right to know what might happen to them as a result of such chemicals?
I don't agree with the mind control/bio warfare/ population reduction excuse but the health effects should be a concern.
Chemicals sprayed from jets that happen to land on the human population. I don't think it is deliberately done to the population. IMHO it is for weather control or to combat global warming.Swing, waitaminute, I'm not convinced that "chemtrails" are really that: Chemical trails deliberately "sprayed" from jets on the human population.
Now on the other hand, if you are talking about jet exhaust contrails (as opposed to the wing vortex generated contrails, which are nothing more than water condensation), and if you agree that we're talking about pollution from that exhaust, then for once I can agree with you that there's a problem. As with any combustion of petroleum product, the health effects are generally well known (such as in this study or this one; sorry that second link isn't a direct one to an article, the point in citing it is that this sort of thing has been and is being studied), but you're right, they're still a concern. In general, any combustion-for-propulsion related pollution is.
But that's assuming you're discussing jet exhaust contrails and not "chemtrails". If the former, you're on firm ground. If the latter, not so much.
Swing, waitaminute, I'm not convinced that "chemtrails" are really that: Chemical trails deliberately "sprayed" from jets on the human population.
Why do you think there would not be chemical spraying operations to combat global warming or in attempt to control or modify the weather as per the U.S. Airforce Force Multiplier paper?
It reminds me of the black triangle UFO people reported in the early 80's only to learn it was the F117 Stealth Fighter in development.
What sort of lift capacity is needed to carry enough of these chemicals to produce fake contrails?
It would take an enormous amount of white powder to duplicate the look of a typical persistent contrail.
A C-5 could just about do it with a bit of spare cargo capacity, but a C-17 would be struggling.
Just where would these C-5s come from and where are they stored, when they're not spraying their gaseous chemicals which would be ineffective from high altitude anyway.
I did a quick estimate back at post #196.
Anyone who thinks chemicals are being sprayed should just get an air sample from their next airliner trip. The cabin air is at least partially from directly outside the aircraft, so just bring a jar or a ziploc bag and sample the cabin air and have it tested. You will have a generous portion of high altitude air in your sample and it will contain any chemicals that are being sprayed.
If you believe the cabin air filters are preventing you from capturing the chemicals or particles, just ask for a used cabin air filter, cut it open, and have it tested.
You seriously made this comment? 
Reheat
Originally Posted by Swing Dangler View Post
Why do you think there would not be chemical spraying operations to combat global warming or in attempt to control or modify the weather as per the U.S. Airforce Force Multiplier paper?
This is NOT a conspiracy.
Originally Posted by Swing Dangler View Post
It reminds me of the black triangle UFO people reported in the early 80's only to learn it was the F117 Stealth Fighter in development.
This was NOT a conspiracy. I knew about it and what it was. Why didn't you? Could it possibly be that you are not important enough to know minor details, ermmmm, like another event that you're obsessed with?
Suuuuuurrreeee you did, Reheat. Sure you did.
You agree then their are ongoing chemical dispersion operations taking place to either control the weather or combat global warming?
You seriously made this comment?