If the "wittnesses" are all lying/incorrect then why doesn't the US government release the 85+ videos they confiscated which would clearly clarify the plane's flight path?
Take your time and think before answering.
So, an impasse then TC. You have a few witnesses that say it went along a flightpath that would have it to the north of the Citgo while many others have it on a flightpath that lines up with the physical damage including the light poles that were hit.
Now, the purpose of this thread , IIRC, was to give the CIT a chance to come up with a flight path or a range of paths , that can actually be flown by real aircraft. So far you have utterly failed to do so.
Therefore what do we have; one set of witnesses that say the plane came in along a path further to the north and a group that put it on a path that at one point runs parallel to Columbia Pike and runs straight down to the Pentagon pasiing to the south of the Citgo.
We have consensus among all witness who have anything to say about the final act of the aircraft they saw, it hit the building. No one says it pulled up and over the building, no one even says they thought it had hit an upper floor.
What we also have is physical evidence, the path of destruction in the Pentagon and the downed lamp poles that agree with the second group. We also have the physics of all paths that would take the plane along a path to the north of the Citgo while also having been , at some point, over the Navy Annex, Paik, and Morin, which demonstrates that the plane simply could not perform the manouvers or at the very least be performing such a dramatic bank that it is nigh on impossible that no one would comment on it.
The ball is still firmly in the CIT/PfT court on this one. So far all paths that Craig et al have drawn on a map have been shown to be ridiculous as far as the physical capabilities of the aircraft, a pilot, or not being commented upon by any witness.
