• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Challenge to CIT

TC329 said:
You spin doctors haven't "caught me lying" anywhere. This is yet another lie you spread. Just like the lie the camera's don't record video because the Pentagon isn't worried about employees coming back at night and doing anything illegal or that causes a security breach.

I'm sure they have surveillance camera's at [removed by me] so next time you goto work snoop around and you might notice them.

Only convienant stores and banks and corporations record on their surveillance videos. The US Government does not. Not even at it's Military HQ.

What do they put in that kool aid that keeps all you lemmings in line?[/QUOTE

Shouldn't you be out raising funds to defend Gary?
Click to expand...
 
Of all of your witnesses, how many saw the plane fly over the pentagon?

Simple question, TC. Please answer it.
 
TC329 said:
What do they put in that kool aid that keeps all you lemmings in line?
Click to expand...

Oh man, a member of the CIT accusing others of being lemmings! That is hilarious! Everyone of their witnesses says the plane hit the pentagon, and they can't deal with it.

Anyway, STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!

I issue the following challenge to "CIT" or their
representative.

A map of the flight path depicting ANY aircraft that reasonably meets YOUR witnesses descriptions flying a path from overhead Edward Paik's business to a position North of the Citgo Station and then directly to the impact point at the Pentagon.

Your diagram should include speed, headings, bank angles, G's (both lateral and vertical), estimated altitude and pull up point to overfly the Pentagon.

There should be no extraneous words, no spin, just a map including the above requested numbers.

STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!
 
16.5 said:
Oh man, a member of the CIT accusing others of being lemmings! That is hilarious! Everyone of their witnesses says the plane hit the pentagon, and they can't deal with it.

Anyway, STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!

I issue the following challenge to "CIT" or their
representative.

A map of the flight path depicting ANY aircraft that reasonably meets YOUR witnesses descriptions flying a path from overhead Edward Paik's business to a position North of the Citgo Station and then directly to the impact point at the Pentagon.

Your diagram should include speed, headings, bank angles, G's (both lateral and vertical), estimated altitude and pull up point to overfly the Pentagon.

There should be no extraneous words, no spin, just a map including the above requested numbers.

STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!
Click to expand...

Hi Hani,

Where is yours which includes the VDOT Tower?

Looking forward to your reply
 
TC329 said:
You spin doctors haven't "caught me lying" anywhere. This is yet another lie you spread.
Click to expand...


Would you like me to post the proof that you were caught lying? Please answer this question. Don’t ignore it.
 
TC329 said:
Just like the lie the camera's don't record video because the Pentagon isn't worried about employees coming back at night and doing anything illegal or that causes a security breach.
Click to expand...


You have simply committed the argument from incredulity fallacy again. I asked you to refrain from committing this fallacy. If you have anything in the way of evidence – as opposed to merely your own personal incredulity – to support your claim, then by all means cite it.
 
Can someone with the "Truther handbook" please translate why Dom is referring to 16.5 as "Hani"?

My gut feeling is that since Dom is Craig and Aldo's biitch that Dom saw Aldo's obsessoin with discovering who people are and is now being the good little biitch he is and copying Aldo.

But I could be wrong....
 
TC329 said:
Hi Hani,

Where is yours which includes the VDOT Tower?

Looking forward to your reply
Click to expand...

There is one in the relevant thread.

This thread, however, is about YOUR theory. Please stay on topic and respond to the challenge below:

I issue the following challenge to "CIT" or their
representative.

A map of the flight path depicting ANY aircraft that reasonably meets YOUR witnesses descriptions flying a path from overhead Edward Paik's business to a position North of the Citgo Station and then directly to the impact point at the Pentagon.

Your diagram should include speed, headings, bank angles, G's (both lateral and vertical), estimated altitude and pull up point to overfly the Pentagon.

There should be no extraneous words, no spin, just a map including the above requested numbers.
Click to expand...
 
Bobert said:
Can someone with the "Truther handbook" please translate why Dom is referring to 16.5 as "Hani"?

My gut feeling is that since Dom is Craig and Aldo's biitch that Dom saw Aldo's obsessoin with discovering who people are and is now being the good little biitch he is and copying Aldo.

But I could be wrong....
Click to expand...


The bogus "pilots" were never more buffoonish than the time Rob Balsamo engaged me in a lengthy phone conversation to contend that he and his colleagues don't duck debates. We established that they are willing to debate in any venue excepts ones where an actual debate might be held. At one point in the conversation, Balsamo pointed out that the call was being recorded. Note that he hadn't asked my permission. Irritated though I was by the deceptive behavior, I responded that his taping me was unimportant as I would say the same things whether I was being taped or not. It pleased me to think that their childish and sleazy trickery had gone to waste.

Much later, one of the CIT frauds alluded to the conversation in a post on this forum, trying to act as though I should be afraid to see the contents made public. Is it necessary to state that the only reason the contents of that conversation have not been made public is that they do absolutely nothing to advance the evil and deranged fantasies of a few remarkably paranoid and silly fools?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, Champ, we are asking for yours with your witnesses, as such:

STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!

I issue the following challenge to "CIT" or their
representative.

A map of the flight path depicting ANY aircraft that reasonably meets YOUR witnesses descriptions flying a path from overhead Edward Paik's business to a position North of the Citgo Station and then directly to the impact point at the Pentagon.

Your diagram should include speed, headings, bank angles, G's (both lateral and vertical), estimated altitude and pull up point to overfly the Pentagon.

There should be no extraneous words, no spin, just a map including the above requested numbers.

STOP DODGING THE QUESTION CIT!!
 
TheRedWorm said:
Of all of your witnesses, how many saw the plane fly over the pentagon?

Simple question, TC. Please answer it.
Click to expand...


If you don't mind. It is a much simpler question to answer than the ones asking about your math. So, again, if you don't mind.
 
TheRedWorm said:
If you don't mind. It is a much simpler question to answer than the ones asking about your math. So, again, if you don't mind.
Click to expand...

None of the witnesses said it flew over.
None of the witnesses said it hit light poles.
All of the witnesses said it was over the navy annex and/or on the NoC.
 
Thank you. It is good to see that you admit that not a single witness saw a flyover. Now one more question, if you don't mind. How many of your witnesses saw the plane hit the pentagon?
 
TC329 said:
Sure, lets see it.
Click to expand...


All right.

TC329 said:
Says [Bobert] who was outted as a racist yesterday...
Click to expand...
Bobert said:
You accused me of being a racist. Can you please provide a link to what in the F you are referring to?
Click to expand...
TC329 said:
When asked what were Aldo's qualifications your reply was that he was a DJ. You meant it in a very derogatory manner, as if to belittle...
Click to expand...


You said that Bobert had been “outted as a racist yesterday”, and yet this simply did not take place. You were caught lying.
 
Last edited:
Par said:
All right.






You said that Bobert had been “outted as a racist yesterday”, and yet this simply did not take place. You were caught lying.
Click to expand...

I would like to add that I have very very thick skin but when he posted that I took it very seriously and began to seek out why he would post such utter and vile BS.

He responded with some foolishness about how I referred to Aldo as a "DJ" in a derogatory manner.
I simply said he was a "DJ" and he is a "DJ".
When I posted this it was to illustrate how Aldo has no experience dealing with accident investigation, crime scene investigation, aircraft, etc.
Even Aldo acknowledges this when he posted
We have no credentials or certifications.
Click to expand...
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/233015/1/#new

I guess I may have been partially wrong because later Dom posted that Aldo was an "MC".
So I do apologize for getting his job title/rank wrong.
Although a year and half ago Craig referred to him as a "DJ" so maybe since then he has changed jobs?
If I offended any "DJ's" here at JREF with my appalling behavior I certainly do apologize.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom