• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Challenge to CIT

You say facing outward. that pretty vague. Most video survelience cameras that I know of that are mounted on an elevated location around a building usually face downward to monitor where all the people are.

Go studying some images. When you find the ones that show the camera on the roof above the impact zone pointed straight at the Citgo get back to me, newbie.
 
Hi Jason!

Hope all is well. I was curious.....do you believe anyone ever planted evidence at a crime scene in order to implicate someone else?

Hi Dom

Yes, I'm sure it's happened at least once in all of time, however that doesn't mean that all physical evidence is dismissed simply because "the police could have planted it", you'd have to have some proof of that.

I never said all 85 show the flight path Dr. Spin. The odds though of 80+ videos in a small compressed area all missing a 757 flying around are not in your favor.

Whose favor are they in? and what, exactly, are those odds, Dom?

1:2?
1:10?

Please also explain your math...we know how you guys are with numbers and all.
 
Yes, I'm sure it's happened at least once in all of time, however that doesn't mean that all physical evidence is dismissed simply because "the police could have planted it", you'd have to have some proof of that.

And of course we know that the only reason he so eagerly hand waves this physical evidence away with 'it could have been planted' is so he doesn't have to dealt with it. I'm sure TC knows that as a debate tactic it's pretty laughable without any evidence to back it up.

In fact, I've decided to call TC a bank robber. You DO know, TC, that people rob banks, right? CRIMINAL!!
 
Last edited:
I see you guys had a little fun with a funny fellow from the circus while I was busy.

One item no one mentioned in retort to false assumptions was Pentagon Security using recorded video. TC329, you do know the Security at the Pentagon is mostly LIVE, don't you? No, you don't, but I'm trying to be nice. Do you know if those cameras that you've seen along the West wall have video recording? I didn't think you did. They use live roving patrols and watch multiple TV screens from cameras all around the building. Not all are recorded. If you'll hire me as a consultant at $ 100 per hour and pay my travel expenses, I'll find out which ones have recorded video and which ones don't. I'll be sure and report back to you so you don't have to make big assumptions and make a fool of yourself in public.

Recordings are only good after the fact and you and your buddies have stated many times that it is the most secure building in the world belonging to the most powerful military in the world. Therefore, they are not terribly interested in "AFTER THE FACT" information, they are interested in the here and now in order to STOP breaches of security, not necessarily just file a report afterward based on video.

Do you think Lagasse and Brooks direct traffic all day? No, they are SECURITY PERSONNEL hired to use their two eyeballs and common sense.

I'm getting pretty disgusted with your mistakes. Every time you post you make multiple mistakes. If you're expect to win a Pulitzer with your investigative work with CIT, you're going to have to sharpen up your senses and increase your knowledge tremendously. Maybe you need to use more light. That might just add some brightness to your thoughts.:p
 
I never said all 85 show the flight path Dr. Spin. The odds though of 80+ videos in a small compressed area all missing a 757 flying around are not in your favor.
Because at least some of them will be pointed up in the air along the flightpath, right?
 
Go studying some images. When you find the ones that show the camera on the roof above the impact zone pointed straight at the Citgo get back to me, newbie.

Shouldn't that be your job? You are the who needs to find a security camera facing in the direction of the CITGO to support your theory.
 
After seeing the behaviour of the CIT clowns at LCF, Robs phone stalking and the sick posts from the wheelchair girl being attacked, I would not give any of these muppets my name. What little there is left of this movement is awash with whackos.
 
Wait, the CIT is only going to discourse with people who use their real names on the Tubes??

Heh heh, now THAT is a strategy for success on the Intraweb!
 
Last edited:
Go studying some images. When you find the ones that show the camera on the roof above the impact zone pointed straight at the Citgo get back to me, newbie.

Prove to me the lens on that dome camera was pointed straight out from the building! I have 3 dome cameras on the front of my building and NONE of them are looking straight outward. 1 of them looks across the front of the building, 1 looks at my parking lot and 1 looks straight down at the entry door.

You obviously know SQUAT about video surveillance.
 
Prove to me the lens on that dome camera was pointed straight out from the building! I have 3 dome cameras on the front of my building and NONE of them are looking straight outward. 1 of them looks across the front of the building, 1 looks at my parking lot and 1 looks straight down at the entry door.

You obviously know SQUAT about video surveillance.

Oh ok, so then it would only have captured the 757 slamming into the building is what you're saying?

I also love the theory the government and their sympathisers put out that the cameras don't record and are just live. Yes of course, the HQ of the mightiest military in the world wouldn't want to record any events that might happen which could be a security issue. Now why would they want to do that?

Yet everyplace I have worked for the last 10 years (all under constant surveillance at multiple facilities) has all the footage logged and recorded and stored.

Every tech business in western Pa, but not the HQ of the mightiest military in the world. What a joke. You lemmings swallow anything big brother spoon feeds you.

"Sketpics".....LMMFAO!!!!
 
TC do you realise a lot of the cameras in the area will have been privately owned, and that their owners might not have wanted to release the footage just to silence some wannabe scooby doo conspiracy theorists.
 
I also love the theory the government and their sympathisers put out that the cameras don't record and are just live. Yes of course, the HQ of the mightiest military in the world wouldn't want to record any events that might happen which could be a security issue. Now why would they want to do that?


This, of course, is an argument from incredulity fallacy. Please refrain from committing this fallacy in future. If you have anything in the way of evidence – as opposed to merely your own personal disbelief – to support your claim, then by all means cite it.
 
Last edited:
Yet everyplace I have worked for the last 10 years (all under constant surveillance at multiple facilities) has all the footage logged and recorded and stored.


I’ve no idea if this is true. You were caught lying a few weeks ago, just as you were caught lying earlier in this very thread. So, who knows? This could well be just another lie.
 
I’ve no idea if this is true. You were caught lying a few weeks ago, just as you were caught lying earlier in this very thread. So, who knows? This could well be just another lie.


You spin doctors haven't "caught me lying" anywhere. This is yet another lie you spread. Just like the lie the camera's don't record video because the Pentagon isn't worried about employees coming back at night and doing anything illegal or that causes a security breach.

I'm sure they have surveillance camera's at [removed by me] so next time you goto work snoop around and you might notice them.

Only convienant stores and banks and corporations record on their surveillance videos. The US Government does not. Not even at it's Military HQ.

What do they put in that kool aid that keeps all you lemmings in line?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom