Perspective
Some good analysis!
Yes, that "Guard Shack" was not the one Terry Morin was describing. Perhaps it was one of the structures in the other photos or perhaps it had been removed prior to the overhead views. The VDOT tower in NOT in the photo, it is further West of that location. I still can not identify that building in the background just above and slightly right of the "Guard Shack" in Ingersoll's photo that someone else mentioned. The photo is essentially not of much value.
CIT has had this account and the photos in their files for over a year and have not used it previously. Why?
Now, in desperation they start posting, twisting, turning, spinning, and clinging to it with great tenacity. Why? You only get three guesses two of which will be thrown out!
Terry Morin's location COULD NOT have been in between those two buildings, 4 & 5, and allow him to describe the aircraft in the detail he did. That's not what he said and that's not where he was. He said he watched the aircraft for several seconds. If it was on the path CIT described he COULD NOT have seen it for very long at all, perhaps not even for a second. He even described the trees NE of the Annex which blocked his view. If that blocked his view, he most certainly could not have watcheed the aircraft flying NoC.
The flight path they have drawn is nearly precisely the one I have PROVEN was physically and aerodynamically IMPOSSIBLE. Still no numbers from CIT or pfffft to refute that. Shouldn't other twoofers be wondering why they haven't produced some math to prove their case?
Remember, all CIT has are some contradictory, mutually exclusive statements from witnesses several years after the fact and this Terry Morin account which they are "cherry picking" more blatantly than the others.
Is it surprising that they won't reveal to whom they taken this hogwash?
They would literally be laughed out of the building.
Some good analysis!
Yes, that "Guard Shack" was not the one Terry Morin was describing. Perhaps it was one of the structures in the other photos or perhaps it had been removed prior to the overhead views. The VDOT tower in NOT in the photo, it is further West of that location. I still can not identify that building in the background just above and slightly right of the "Guard Shack" in Ingersoll's photo that someone else mentioned. The photo is essentially not of much value.
CIT has had this account and the photos in their files for over a year and have not used it previously. Why?
Now, in desperation they start posting, twisting, turning, spinning, and clinging to it with great tenacity. Why? You only get three guesses two of which will be thrown out!
Terry Morin's location COULD NOT have been in between those two buildings, 4 & 5, and allow him to describe the aircraft in the detail he did. That's not what he said and that's not where he was. He said he watched the aircraft for several seconds. If it was on the path CIT described he COULD NOT have seen it for very long at all, perhaps not even for a second. He even described the trees NE of the Annex which blocked his view. If that blocked his view, he most certainly could not have watcheed the aircraft flying NoC.
The flight path they have drawn is nearly precisely the one I have PROVEN was physically and aerodynamically IMPOSSIBLE. Still no numbers from CIT or pfffft to refute that. Shouldn't other twoofers be wondering why they haven't produced some math to prove their case?
Remember, all CIT has are some contradictory, mutually exclusive statements from witnesses several years after the fact and this Terry Morin account which they are "cherry picking" more blatantly than the others.
Is it surprising that they won't reveal to whom they taken this hogwash?
They would literally be laughed out of the building.
Thus Morin is looking down and all that will get in his way will be items in his foreground or others that are tall enough to extend into his line of sight. The parking lot is flat, it is the most prominent foreground object that would interfere with his line of sight and any trees beyond that would also interfere.
