• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Challenge to CIT

Terry Morin Flight Path

Since CIT wants to move the flight path from where the witness said, so can I.

Hey CIT, this is the Terry Morin irrefutable, Scientifically Corroborated, and verified by me Flight Path. It is PROOF of the "Official Flight Path" because I say so.

 
PB&J said:
i.e. "We don't flat out state things so we can try to change our story later when we feel comforted by clinging to Balsamo's 'credibility'."

The sound of their death-rattle is overpowering. I wonder what they are going to do when Balsamo never comes back with any calculations.. it's been almost a month for him to refute RMacky's 4-hour project.
Click to expand...

The refrain from Pft is "we don't make claims". That way all they ever do is JAQ.
Of course they did title that one page something akin to 'the math proves that the plane could not ,,,blah blah blah" in which their applied math and physics prowess was trotted out on the runway for all to see, and shown to be sorely wanting. I would characterize that page as having made a claim. That is then quite unfortunate if it actually is the first actual claim they have made since it is a claim based on a steaming pile of very bad applied math and physics.
 
Reheat said:
Since CIT wants to move the flight path from where the witness said, so can I.

Hey CIT, this is the Terry Morin irrefutable, Scientifically Corroborated, and verified by me Flight Path. It is PROOF of the "Official Flight Path" because I say so.

Click to expand...
Confirmed by CIT witness. On video, on gif!
Edwardpointsnorth.gif

Placing him on Google earth, you can use the tower, the house , and the business parking lot to see how he describes, in a gif, his "level" flight path is to the Pentagon. Proof, by a "hard evidence" CIT witness statement, NoC impossible. With the astute research and analysis of CIT, he confirms the actual path 77 took on 9/11, CIT missed in their own work. ??.
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
Since CIT wants to move the flight path from where the witness said, so can I.

Hey CIT, this is the Terry Morin irrefutable, Scientifically Corroborated, and verified by me Flight Path. It is PROOF of the "Official Flight Path" because I say so.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_18407480525b7662fb.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

It strikes me that the difference between Turcois's flight path (his third one in "The Pentacon", which the CIT actually like) and Lagasses's flight path is about the same as the difference between Morin's (as depicted by Reheat) and Paik's ( in which the plane flies over the south east corner of the Annex).

Of course the CiT will claim that we need to have an exactamundo flight path whereas they need only repeat, ad nauseum, [cue Benedictine chant mode] north of Citgo[/cue]
 
Last edited:
Heck, I have a science degree, beachnut watched a science program on TV today, and jaydeehess watched one yesterday, so we're all qualified. I'm sure RMackey, who is a Scientist will verify this flight path too. Then we'll have a Quadruple Scientifically Corroborated irrefutable flight path not even CIT can match. And yes, it's been independently verified and will continue to be independently verified as more people witness it.

OH Paik, you say. Well, you see all Koreans are near sighted and Paik is probably a vain man, so he didn't tell you that he really couldn't see the aircraft, he just heard it and projected the flight path down Columbia Pike. That is true because I say so. Prove me wrong!

Here it is again, in case you missed it the first time....



ETA: This IS my homework Domenick! See how easy that was and I even posted it before the dog ate it! Now, where are your calculations? Did the dog eat them again?

 
Last edited:
Anyway, back to the extreme silliness that is CIT.

Waldo's latest post puts Morin BACK in between the wings of the Annex (which Waldo should know is impossible, because how could he have seen it "clearing the 8th wing" etc etc). While Craig AND SPreston put Morin outside the wings, and in fact posted a photo several times showing Morin's "POV," which of course is OUTSIDE the wings.

Uh-Oh cat fight in the CIT! Talk about the gang that cannot shoot straight, they can't even get their misrepresentations to line up!

Morons.
 
Reheat said:
Could we have more SCIENTIFIC corroboration, please? I'm worried about this one! :D
Click to expand...

I'll give it a shot.

Here is my hypothesized flight path, along with calculations to prove it. Let me know what you think...

16803480543fe9ca6c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
Heck, I have a science degree, beachnut watched a science program on TV today, and jaydeehess watched one yesterday, so we're all qualified. I'm sure RMackey, who is a Scientist will verify this flight path too. Then we'll have a Quadruple Scientifically Corroborated irrefutable flight path not even CIT can match. And yes, it's been independently verified and will continue to be independently verified as more people witness it.

OH Paik, you say. Well, you see all Koreans are near sighted and Paik is probably a vain man, so he didn't tell you that he really couldn't see the aircraft, he just heard it and projected the flight path down Columbia Pike. That is true because I say so. Prove me wrong!

Here it is again, in case you missed it the first time....

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_18407480525b7662fb.jpg[/qimg]

ETA: This IS my homework Domenick! See how easy that was and I even posted it before the dog ate it! Now, where are your calculations? Did the dog eat them again?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1840746c1f10359a41.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

*queue Billy May's voice*

You're catching on to their tactics!! Now, simply post that same image 50 more times on this site, LCF, ATS, PFFFT, and CIT's forums and it becomes fact!!

Yes, you too can become an idiot CTer spewing psycho-babble!! Simply follow CIT's easy program and you can create your own universe where everything you ever think is true and factual!!
 
Has anyone noticed that almost nobody pays attention to them over at the LCF? They just keep making topics and posting their ramblings over and over again, and it seems like theyre just talking to themselves.
 
Well I did in fact watch a science program today but it was on mag-lev trains.

On the other hand I took a year of university physics before switching to college and getting a diploma in electronics. Fortunately that means I can properly apply math and physics formulae. As an aside I hung around with journalism students one of which is now a Dean of a journalism school and another the Editor in chief of a large newspaper so I also learned to be able to detect bad investigatory practises by listening to them critique news reporting as undergrads.
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
Could we have more SCIENTIFIC corroboration, please? I'm worried about this one! :D
Click to expand...

I can confirm that your hypothetical flight path is firmly based on an unfalsifiable conjecture and therefore is of greater scientific value than the PfT flightpaths, which seem to be based on one of those French curve bendy ruler things that we used in high school back in the 1970's. And I used to use one, so I know what I'm talking about here.

Dave
 
Terry Morin's Testimony Review

Watching CIT's rendition of this latest witnesses' statements must be what it's like at an Insane Asylum "show and tell".

The mentality is such that since the only thing they can cling too to support their fantasy are witness statements (most of which are years after recollections) they attribute the same dependence upon witness statements to prove the generally accepted damage flight path. Therefore, "If we can prove the flight path over the Navy Annex, it disproves the OCT. Since it disproves the OCT flight path, it's proves the NoC Flight Path.

The twoofer mind never ceases to amaze me!
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
Therefore, "If we can prove the flight path over the Navy Annex, it disproves the OCT. Since it disproves the OCT flight path, it's proves the NoC Flight Path.

The twoofer mind never ceases to amaze me!
Click to expand...

Another CIT false-dichotomy:
- If it doesn't support the official theory, it supports the flyover
- If you don't agree with what the witness said, you're calling them a liar
- Either all the witnesses hallucinated (about noc) or it was a deliberate military deception (impact)*

*Not sure how any of their evidence implicates the military.....
 
"If you don't agree with what the witness said, you're calling them a liar."

Unless you disagree with the CIT's witnesses' consistent, clear testimony that the plane hit the Pentagon, (or that the plane flew parrallel to the annex, etc, etc, etc) AND you are a member of CIT, then by all means call them a liar!

That thread over at LC kind of died when we pointed out that Waldo's version of Morin's location directly conflicted with Craig's and SPreston's. OOOOOOOPPPS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom