Challenge to CIT
- Thread starter Reheat
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cit edward paik pentagon
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Craig taking two photos taken at different angles and lines them up as if they are both level.
They're still defending p4t's math.
They still assert that there is a flight path that will put the plane NoC with parameters that agree with their witnesses descriptions.
yes, jhunter, the stupid , it burns and the goggles they do nothing
They're still defending p4t's math.
They still assert that there is a flight path that will put the plane NoC with parameters that agree with their witnesses descriptions.
yes, jhunter, the stupid , it burns and the goggles they do nothing
Craig's never been very good at matching up pictures....
...or maybe the 'truth' is more important than the truth to him.
Drs_Res
NWO Acorn Hoarder
Could it be that the CIT is a government experiment designed to see how dumbed down the populace is?
*I mean CIT is only one letter away from CIA.*
*I mean CIT is only one letter away from CIA.*
But the two shared letters mean different things: "Central Intelligence," as opposed to "Confused Imbeciles."
Hokulele
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
I know this is mean, wrong, petty, childish, and beneath my dignity, but every time I see the CIT moniker, I keep trying to squeeze an "L" in there. Somewhere.
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
CILT?? 
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Rob Balsamo@pffffft said:
Balsamo might be figuring it this way.
centrepetal accelleration of 1 g(32 f/s2)
250MPH = 367 f/s
a=v2/r >> r=v[sup[]2[/sup]/a = 3672/32
= 4200 feet turn radius
This would give the plane 5 degrees per second turn rate
It would have a g load of 1.4
However, it would require that a plane going 250 MPH to bank 45 degrees.
Last edited:
Ron,
Bingo!
One of the ultimate objectives of an investigation is concluding the investigation and getting the results out there for the public to see ASAP.
It wouldn't bother me so much if he created this fantasy as an idea BUT he went too far saying he had "smoking gun" evidence and that trials would begin.
IMHO he was toying with people over a VERY VERY sensitive subject just to make a buck. He
He then made it salacious with all the claims of faked DNA and the flyover.
He displays sociopath tendencies.
I am sure he will eventually reap what he sews.
Last edited:
Fixed that for you.
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
Thanks!
HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 459
HAD TO BE!
Otherwise twoofers wouldn't be idiots!
nicepants
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,723
I have asked repeatedly on the PFFFFt forum for Rob to post the "rough calculations" he did, but he refuses to. He just claims "it's possible" without showing his math. (Funny, I don't think he would have let us get away with that kind of response when his "official path is impossible" story broke last month).
If he knows what he's doing those rough calculation took less than 5 minutes. In another 5 minutes they can be refined. There are 2-3 online calculators posted in this thread that calculate the turn radius (which is the most difficult part). Once the turn radius is known it would take 30 seconds to plot with a map and plotter or set of dividers. That part is more difficult and time consuming to do online with Google Earth, but it's possible.
It's my bet that he doesn't know how to plot turn radius, particularly if he's been the one advising CIT. All he can do is blow smoke. He's very proficient at that.
nicepants
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,723
Apparently now he's lost the calculations. I asked him for the value of the radius he used, and this was his reponse:
Rob said:
Yeah...not like he needed those for anything.
A W Smith
Philosopher
how could he? the radius is practically the starting point of the entire calculation. How could he forget it? Ask him how he started? where did he get the radius from? did he take an acceptable bank and speed and work backwards? cause it sure sounds like it. He didn't do a calculation at all. hes bluffing.
LashL
Goddess of Legaltainment™
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 36,711
Last edited:
Wait. Are you saying those numbers by Reheat on the previous page had absolutely nothing to do with Robbie? Unless really neccessary, I tend not to go to pft or cit sites, in case they've got some ad counter going, so I had assumed that at least the speed and bank figures would be Balsamo's. Now you're saying that he didn't even do as much? And the only help, he'd managed to provide to CIT, is a "figure" of 'just over 1G'? Oh, man...