Has the CIT ever explained why the conspirators would need to pull off such an elaborate scheme just to make people think a 757 hit the pentagon when they needed to get rid of a plane either way?
Well its because,,,, actually I forget, but I'm pretty sure some convoluted reasoning was given by someone along with the "we don't need to explain that" line from others.
I another thread there is the contention by Christopher 7 that the steel at the WTC was illegally removed and THAT is why there is no evidence of explosives having benn involved in the collapse of WTC 7 specifically.
So we have Fetzer, A.Jones, S.Jones, Gage and others who say that the removal ond disposal of the steel was illegal. We have CIT saying that evidence was planted (ie tampered with) at the Pentagon and the CIT and Killtown saying the same for Shankesville.
Although evidence tampering is a very serious crime no law or justice agency in the USA has laid charges against anyone nor has the above noted people petitioned and agency or court concerning this. On the other hand Moragn Reynolds did ask for, and receive, his day in court concerning his contention of illegal evidence tampering at the WTC. Specifically his contention that the videos of the planes hitting the towers were faked.
Given that it should be much easier to prove tampering in the case of the WTC 7 steel, it was after all actually disposed of, one would think that this would have made it into a courtroom, but it hasn't.
Given the certainty with which the CIT make their contentions it would also seem that this would have made it into a courtroom as well, but no, it hasn't. they are adamant that, for eg., Lloyd England is lieing and even more so that all the lamp poles could not possibly have been knocked down by the plane.
