• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Challenge to CIT

My "flight path theory" is that the CIT used large amounts of LSD to come up with their "flight path theory".
 
I think what TC and the rest of his CIT mates keep missing is that even without giving an actual flightpath, they have give three points on the map for that flight path (over Mr Paik's business, somewhere north of Citgo, and over the Impact Point on the pentagon.) The best case senario for them is right over the northern end of Citgo, if it is further north the figures just get worse, and so taking that we have the three points that describe the best case senario for their claim of the plane north of Citgo. Since that best case senario fails, then any other flight path they can come up with that is over Paik's shop, north of Citgo and over the impact point is also impossible because they keep getting worse and worse. Slowing down the plane just makes it stall and crash before getting to the Pentagon and speeding up the plane makes it miss the Pentagon altogether and thus there is no possible modern fixed wing large aircraft that could possibly follow any flight path based on their witnesses. For some reason they would rather say that the physics are wrong than they would say that perhaps their witnesses are wrong. I did have to love this part though....

CIT does not believe the witnesses are liars or that multiple eyewitnesses are going to wrongfully corroborate each other.
Click to expand...

Except of course when those multiple eyewitnesses are wrongfully corroborating each other that the plane hit the Pentagon right.
 
nicepants said:
As predicted, Craig has posted yet another "possible flight path", although the scaling makes it impossible to discern much about the path in relation to citgo, etc.

[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/flight%20path/finalloop.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I'm afraid to ask,,,,, but,,,, why is the plane coming into the picture from the east over D.C.?

I had understood that the plane came from the NW and did not go that far to the east.
 
"CIT does not believe the witnesses are liars or that multiple eyewitnesses are going to wrongfully corroborate each other."

Uhhh, CIT asked all of these witnesses leading questions, "correcting" them where necessary. The one thing they could not lead or "correct" them on: the fact that the plane hit the Pentagon.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Anyone want to take a guess as to why they're using pictures zoomed out so much? Could it be to make the required aerobatics look a little less daunting?
Click to expand...

Craig's reasoning:

Craig said:
The view has to be that wide to include the cirtical account of Steve Chaconas.
Click to expand...

He has refused to provide a closer view, probably because he knows it would be destroyed by ReHeat....yet again.

Craig said:
It is on the north side.

That's all that matters.
Click to expand...

Science, physics, reality = moot :covereyes

Someone wiser than myself once said that you can't use logic to change someone's mind when they didn't use logic to make it up in the first place. (Or something to that effect)
 
Me, at LCF:

Bitterman...

It DID crash. Your own witnesses say so. There is a mountain of evidence that says so. And when JREF shows you exactly WHY the NOC flightpath is impossible, you and the rest of the (rule10) (Special High-level Investigative Team) handwave and move the goalposts and say the interviews were unprofessional and you're not aeronautical engineers anyway so why is mean old JREF picking on us when we're just asking questions?

Face it. NOC is a delusion. As the Bible says, there is none so blind as he who will not see.
Click to expand...

It's 8:38 pm EST. I bet I'm banned before 9. I don't care, though. I think I've reached my idiot tolerance level.

ETA: Linky: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/191706/4
 
Last edited:
bje said:
And those who recovered the wreckage of AA 77 from inside of the Pentagon know what they handled.

Any questions?
Click to expand...

BJE please try and keep up!
;)
Those people and airplane parts were PLANTED
by the MLB's!!!
 
Last edited:
jhunter1163 said:
Me, at LCF:
It's 8:38 pm EST. I bet I'm banned before 9. I don't care, though. I think I've reached my idiot tolerance level.

ETA: Linky: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/191706/4
Click to expand...

I'm shocked that you weren't instabanned!

I love what the admin posted

admin@ LCF said:
gotta treat everyone the same."
Click to expand...

And subsequently bans you and does nothing to Dom.

Domenick tells you to "go do something"....yet he's the one with "proof that the official story is a lie" and they're refusing to take it to the authorities.

Pathetic is too nice of a word to describe CIT.
 
Last edited:
Someone call 911 for Domenick

My, my, my, Domenick are you angry?

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/191706/4/

Yes, buddy, I know it's embarrassing to have swallowed a possible PsyOp scheme so well planned and executed by the US Government Employees you interviewed. It would make me angry too. But, anger is not good for you, it's bad for your health.

I see that you are confused by that possible deception to discredit the "Truth Movement" (BM). Well, if you'll come back again when I'm here, without the anger, and be nice, I'll explain it to you in more detail.

BTW, you're kinda distorting the Flight Paths I calculated. Over Paik's business (wings level), NoC (wings level) (ANY DISTANCE YOU WANT NoC within view of your witnesses possible PsyOps Team), to the impact point at the Pentagon. It's not JUST over the Navy Annex and it's not just North of the Citgo. You see your witnesses possible PsyOps Team specified the flight path and you believe them, so that's what it is. It is not exact except at those points, but it is exact over or near those points because that's the irrefutable, Independently Verified, Scientifically Corroborated testimony of your witnesses. Domenick by ignoring what they said, are you now calling your witnesses liars? Would you tell them to their face that they are lying?

Domenick, of what relevance is CIT's financial status? I'm so poor I had to use a stubby yellow pencil (no eraser) and toilet paper to write down my calculations. Doesn't CIT have, at least, that? You can use a clump of dirt to draw on a sidewalk or street, you can even carve on a tree. Where are the numbers and calculations to support your witnesses and Sir Isaac Newton?

It's time for CIT to step up and be a man about this, don't you think?
 
Last edited:
I'd have to say that the thread was worth it for just this one post. It's a pity that not one of the CIT posters bothered reading it. By the way, if you haven't, then do the test they have in it, it'll blow your socks off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom