Challenge to CIT
- Thread starter Reheat
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cit edward paik pentagon
Don't twist my words. I did not say not a single witness saw a flyover.
You asked how many (interviewed by CIT) said the plane flew over. To that I said none of them.
How do you even live with yourself when you twist and distort what people say like this? Does it make you feel more clever in front of your friends?
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
From the link in DGM's post:
Was Lagasse lying when he wrote this?
Was Lagasse lying when he wrote this?
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
And what are you if you're biased against DJs? Jockist?
He's not telling what he saw. Therefor he is not lying but stating what he believes to be true.
Where does LaGasse say he saw the plane hitting the poles? I answered you now you answer me.
What does "directly over the naval annex" mean and what relevance does it have to where the poles went down?
TheRedWorm
I AM the Red Worm!
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,452
Yes, and when I responded, it was implied that I was still talking about your witnesses, not the entire body of witnesses on 9/11. The fault I guess, is mine for not being more clear, and for that I apologize.
My friends? I doubt any one on here actually likes me, more like they tolerate my existence for the time being. But that is not the topic, the topic is; how many of your witnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon? Pleases answer the question, if you don't mind.
It's irrelevant whether he retracts it or not. Even if he repeats it 1000 times you can not prove it with aerodynamics/physics/math. Specifically, what he describes is even more impossible than the current hogwash CIT is peddling. In fact, what CIT now describes is NOT what LaGasse describes, it's only CIT's success at FAILURE.
Until you prove it aerodynamically with other than your silly lines on a map, it DID NOT HAPPEN.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
He says this because he believes it to be true. Doesn't he know the area? Don't you think if he thought the plane flew no where near the poles he wouldn't question this. Is He in denial?
He believes it obviously and knows the area. Flying NoC it would be impossible to hit them. Don't you think he might know this?
Why did he qualify his statement with "splitting the distance"? Maybe he considers the whole navy complex including parking areas.
Try to think outside of your box. (I know that kills your fantasy)
Last edited:
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
This is a pretty obvious admission of your lie. I will refer to you as "liar" from now on.
The Big Dog
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 29,742
So the CIT is not going to answer the question.
We all knew this.
They can't, they are not smart enough, not objective enough, they don't understand that they are the laughing stock of The Twoof movement, to say nothing of anyone with any sort of Education.
Keep up the great work Dom, Waldo and Craig. The world needs a good laugh.
We all knew this.
They can't, they are not smart enough, not objective enough, they don't understand that they are the laughing stock of The Twoof movement, to say nothing of anyone with any sort of Education.
Keep up the great work Dom, Waldo and Craig. The world needs a good laugh.
applecorped
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 20,145
Do you smoke crack?
A W Smith
Philosopher
Dom;
why did you move witness Morin back between the navy annex wings? When it is clear to all by his account he was out by the security check point adjacent to the fence? Morin is a south of Citgo flight path witness. I guess you feel the need to move inconvenient witnesses around like pawns on a chess table to obscure the flight paths they see and describe?
why did you move witness Morin back between the navy annex wings? When it is clear to all by his account he was out by the security check point adjacent to the fence? Morin is a south of Citgo flight path witness. I guess you feel the need to move inconvenient witnesses around like pawns on a chess table to obscure the flight paths they see and describe?
Last edited:
Are you confused? Aldo has cleared it up for you. The security check point was actually a cargo container between Bldgs. 4 & 5! The real Security Check Point by the fence was temporarily being used as a restroom for those who needed a pit stop while passing through the SECURE PERIMETER!
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/208529/6/
Post # !33
Last edited:
The mindless frauds of the CIT have been exposed. Meanwhile, the passengers and crew of the commercial airliner that was flown into the Pentagon by jihadist hijackers, AA Flight 77, remain quite dead. Their remains were identified at the Dover Port Mortuary.
Rob Balsamo, the pilot of p4t, the only people who after 6 years have the following to offer all:
Wow, now what is the problem? With all the evidence from CIT you have no theory?
You guys have worked your butts off, and p4t has no theory?
However, I have seen you interviews; you have failed to become experts at eyewitness interviews. You manufacture information without regard for your eyewitness statements.
uruk
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,311
I have the pic.
Well? you going to post or link it or what? Why the game?