What I find weird is that, when you started off, you were an total advocate of one method (traditional) ... and when you got nowhere with that, then you flippantly switched to another method (chinese), and then additional tweaks (e.g. hour sign). Then when you still get nowhere - you accuse others of lying.
You have no proof that these trials have been anything other than fair. You are choosing to ignore the results of these trials when you don't like them.
You cannot provide details of any independent and well-controlled trial along the lines of those outlined in this thread - yet you don't question why your methods consistently fail to actually work in the real world (rather than in your fantasy world).
So, why are you actually here? More to the point, why should we bother with you?
I suggest that you scuttle off and try to honestly and fairly re-conduct these tests following their protocols are closely as possible with people you actually trust and then come back to us and report honestly on your results.
Of course we can then glibly call you a liar if we choose (if you don't mind us treating you as you are treating us).