carlson test and debunking randi

[idunno]

Who believes all of this nonsense?

You call it nonsense without testing it???
And you say youre not a pseudo skeptic?? .

 

[Locknar]

hi to avoid confusion here is the meaning of the houses

You could have just as eaisly posted a link for this stuff vs flooding the thread, and while helpful (I guess) it does not define or otherwise provide what criteria you are using in your analysis.

Currently, it seems you are making up rules to force a match/sucess; I'm sure that is not the case. It would help everyone if you could provide the rules, and how they apply...then everyone will be on the same playing field.

 

[idunno]

You could have just as eaisly posted a link for this stuff vs flooding the thread, and while helpful (I guess) it does not define or otherwise provide what criteria you are using in your analysis.

Currently, it seems you are making up rules to force a match/sucess; I'm sure that is not the case. It would help everyone if you could provide the rules, and how they apply...then everyone will be on the same playing field.

i scanned one of my books to send this but the system doesnt accept tip files. So i had to copy those files. I agree the book is not very clear.
In my experience when in houses 3 and 4 things begin to look up the person begins to be known, but it is in house 9 and to some extent house 5(the center of atention) that the world looks up to you.
It isnt always the case, but i would dare saying it is right about 7-8 out of 10 times

 

[idunno]

what i find strange about many astrologers is their naiveness, like when they say «this didnt work very well, so astrologers improved this system» as if made up astrology could ever be true. Ive always been surprised at this reasoning flaw. But some of the people who say such things appear educated.

 

[Locknar]

what i find strange about many astrologers is their naiveness, like when they say «this didnt work very well, so astrologers improved this system» as if made up astrology could ever be true. Ive always been surprised at this reasoning flaw. But some of the people who say such things appear educated.

Until you can provide a list of the rules you are using, and how they are applied....what you are doing seems just that; ie. "made up astrology".

 

[arthwollipot]

one of the mistakes skeptics make is to think any chart will do as far as astrologers are concerned. Not true.
Last year i did a chart for a friend. I calculated his rising sign to be Leo. I was surprised cause he didnt strike me as a Leo type. But I accepted the fact, and thought maybe this is all rubbish.Later he told he told me he had been born in Africa not in the continent..which ga ve him the more suitable Virgo ascendant.

I thought that the location of birth was kind of an essential component of drawing up a natal horoscope?

Or are we off natal horoscopes now?

 

[Miss Anthrope]

Bickering split to AAH. Don't make me get out my yellow grumpy cards.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Miss Anthrope

 

[nathan]

i took it for granted he was born here as he was born after the de-colonization

Well, I don't know where 'here' is -- is it a city or a country? Did he tell you time of birth?

You seem to take a lot of things for granted -- I think that might be part of the reason you believe this astrology stuff.