Can Soul, Ghosts Exist?

[PixyMisa]

How these are tested as possibilty of colour changes & momentum changes on potentizaton--or somewhat part exitation or some potential energy stored?

What does any of that have to do with anything at all?

Homeopathy claims to be a system of medicine.

It has been tested and shown to be completely worthless. It doesn't do anything.

Potentization doesn't happen.
Part excitation doesn't happen.
There are no colour changes or momentum changes involved.
No energy is stored, potential or otherwise.

Nothing happens at all, and homeopathy does nothing.

 

[Kumar]

Why do you think some, but not all, homeopathic remedies are "not in accordance with body's biochemistry" (seeing as they are all the same anyway)? What evidence caused you to come to this conclusion? And, to repeat my previous question, which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?" Be specific: name three.

Is this supposed to mean anything?

Because we can understand ' Body's mineral based remedies as per body's bio-chemistry' in a better & specific way & can apply accordingly? All plants & other than direct/same body's biochemical based remedies are needed to be re-thought in view of "Saam"/Similar, the first best. We can treat either by dealing with direct imbalanced body substance or by its competiting,antidoting, or compensating substance?

 

[PixyMisa]

Because we can understand ' Body's mineral based remedies as per body's bio-chemistry' in a better & specific way & can apply accordingly? All plants & other than direct/same body's biochemical based remedies are needed to be re-thought in view of "Saam"/Similar, the first best. We can treat either by dealing with direct imbalanced body substance or by its competiting,antidoting, or compensating substance?

No.

Homeopathy has been tested. It does not work.

How hard is this to understand? We tested it. It doesn't work.

We test all medicines. We only use the ones that work.

Aspirin works. Penicillin works. Ibuprofen works. Cortisone works. Lots of things work. We test them, and we know what they do, and what doses to use, and what side effects they might have.

Homeopathy has been tested, and it does not work.

 

[Kumar]

What does any of that have to do with anything at all?

Homeopathy claims to be a system of medicine.

It has been tested and shown to be completely worthless. It doesn't do anything.

Potentization doesn't happen.
Part excitation doesn't happen.
There are no colour changes or momentum changes involved.
No energy is stored, potential or otherwise.

Nothing happens at all, and homeopathy does nothing.

These are just your/s views or readings which are non-pesonally experianced or non-practical experianced based. People who have experianced & still experiancing repetedly & regularily & so are practically experianced tells differant but positive views. Practical experiance & time testing is more valid.

 

[Mojo]

Because we can understand ' Body's mineral based remedies as per body's bio-chemistry' in a better & specific way & can apply accordingly? All plants & other than direct/same body's biochemical based remedies are needed to be re-thought in view of "Saam"/Similar, the first best. We can treat either by dealing with direct imbalanced body substance or by its competiting,antidoting, or compensating substance?

Kumar, you have stated:

Posted by Kumar
In my opinion h.remedies should be pruned substancially

When I asked you which homeopathic remedies you thought should be "pruned", you replied:

Posted by Kumar
Which are not in accordance with body's biochemistry.

What you posted in reply to further questions about this was no kind of answer to the questions I asked, so I'll repeat the questions:

1.) Why do you think some, but not all, homeopathic remedies are "not in accordance with body's biochemistry?"

2.) What evidence caused you to come to this conclusion?

3.) Which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?" Be specific: name the remedies you think should be pruned.

 

[MRC_Hans]

These are just your/s views or readings which are non-pesonally experianced or non-practical experianced based.

Wrong. They are not just ours, they are the results from real-life tests, published in peer-reviewed journals. Further, SOME of us have actually tested homeopathic remedies personally.

People who have experianced & still experiancing repetedly & regularily & so are practically experianced tells differant but positive views. Practical experiance & time testing is more valid.

No matter how often you repeat this, it remains wrong. People can be wrong. Lots of people can be wrong. Lots of people can be wrong for centuries.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Kumar, you have stated: When I asked you which homeopathic remedies you thought should be "pruned", you replied:
What you posted in reply to further questions about this was no kind of answer to the questions I asked, so I'll repeat the questions:

1.) Why do you think some, but not all, homeopathic remedies are "not in accordance with body's biochemistry?"

2.) What evidence caused you to come to this conclusion?

3.) Which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?" Be specific: name the remedies you think should be pruned.

And if you can induce Kumar to give direct answers to THAT, you will be the all-time hero of the JREF.

Hans

 

[Zep]

Kumar, homeopathy, part-excitation, mass existing, all that stuff...

 

[Mojo]

And if you can induce Kumar to give direct answers to THAT, you will be the all-time hero of the JREF.

Hans

Well, I did get him to spell "different" without an "a" in it once. It took a while though, and it doesn't seem to have been permanent...

 

[Kumar]

Mojo, one should hate & avoid overloadng/overstraining his mind to avoid mistakes, misses, oversights, confusion, adversities etc. So things should be within one's brain capacity esp. of those aspects which are required to deal by memory. The most important requirement in case of HRs is to know chemical composition & ash analysis of raw remedy's substances of organic based remedies & commons & similar type of substances should be pruned.

 

[PixyMisa]

These are just your/s views or readings which are non-pesonally experianced or non-practical experianced based.

No.

False.

Wrong.

They are the documented results of controlled clinical trials, along with years of carefully monitored and documented use.

People who have experianced & still experiancing repetedly & regularily & so are practically experianced tells differant but positive views.

But they aren't practically experienced. They are demonstrably ignorant and do not follow even the most basic procedures of testing or documentation.

Practical experiance & time testing is more valid.

Complete baloney.

You don't test anything.

You don't know what remedies are supposed to have what effects.

You can't tell the remedies apart.

You don't record anything.

There is no practical experience involved. There is no time testing involved. There is just perpetual blindness and self-imposed ignorance.

Homeopathy has been tested. It does not work.

 

[PixyMisa]

Mojo, one should hate & avoid overloadng/overstraining his mind to avoid mistakes, misses, oversights, confusion, adversities etc. So things should be within one's brain capacity esp. of those aspects which are required to deal by memory.

Kumar, you would be well advised to follow your own advice.

Too late now, I suspect.

The most important requirement in case of HRs is to know chemical composition & ash analysis of raw remedy's substances of organic based remedies & commons & similar type of substances should be pruned.

What?

 

[Mojo]

Mojo, one should hate & avoid overloadng/overstraining his mind to avoid mistakes, misses, oversights, confusion, adversities etc. So things should be within one's brain capacity esp. of those aspects which are required to deal by memory. The most important requirement in case of HRs is to know chemical composition & ash analysis of raw remedy's substances of organic based remedies & commons & similar type of substances should be pruned.

1.) Which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?" Be specific: name some remedies you think should be pruned.

2.) What evidence caused you to come to this conclusion?

3.) Why do you think some, but not all, homeopathic remedies are "not in accordance with body's biochemistry?"

 

[Kumar]

1.) Which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?" Be specific: name some remedies you think should be pruned.

2.) What evidence caused you to come to this conclusion?

3.) Why do you think some, but not all, homeopathic remedies are "not in accordance with body's biochemistry?"

1. To select after knowing their analysis. Specific remedy data is not yet made as just deal on symptoms basis. Several common symptoms(which can base on same chemicals in several remedies) TRS system already pruned so much in view of similar concept. If you just consider my personal view, all non-mineral based remedies should be checked.

2. TRS system.

3. Non-human based compositions can be differant from humans.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Mojo, one should hate & avoid overloadng/overstraining his mind to avoid mistakes, misses, oversights, confusion, adversities etc. So things should be within one's brain capacity esp. of those aspects which are required to deal by memory. *snip*

Well, that shure explains the way you act, Kumar. Now, I'm shure YOU aren't overstraining you brain, hehehe. Better to ask a lot of dumb questions instead of tring to think for yourself. And better not listen to the answers, who knows, it might make you think .

Well, I'll know how to handle you in the future (as if I didn't already )


Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

1. To select after knowing their analysis. Specific remedy data is not yet made as just deal on symptoms basis. Several common symptoms(which can base on same chemicals in several remedies) TRS system already pruned so much in view of similar concept. If you just consider my personal view, all non-mineral based remedies should be checked.

2. TRS system.

3. Non-human based compositions can be differant from humans.

Cool! He actually answered.



....



I would have been somewhat more impressed if the answers had made any sense, of course.

Hans

 

[Zep]

Oooo! Let ME try!

1) An umbrella.

2) A piece of string.

3) Abraham Lincoln.


How'd I do?

 

[Traveller]

Oh come on, be sensible. I mean - Abraham Lincoln?

 

[Mojo]

1. To select after knowing their analysis. Specific remedy data is not yet made as just deal on symptoms basis. Several common symptoms(which can base on same chemicals in several remedies) TRS system already pruned so much in view of similar concept. If you just consider my personal view, all non-mineral based remedies should be checked.

2. TRS system.

3. Non-human based compositions can be differant from humans.

Let's try again. I'll ask them one at a time to avoid overloading your brain too much.

Question 1

Kumar, You have stated that, in your opinion, some homeopathic remedies should be "pruned." Assuming that there is some sort of rational process going on here, this means that you consider some homeopathic remedies to be ineffective, or harmful, or both.

Which homeopathic remedies do you think should be "pruned?"

Be specific: name some remedies!

 

[PixyMisa]

He meant Thomas Jefferson, obviously. I get the two confused myself half the time.