Can Jesus Inspire Science?

[dafydd]

His Serene Knowledge mortgaged his house to build himself a tall cyber-minaret to blow his scientific trumpet from. Lols.
Keep on hacking . . .

Did the Pope get his mortgage from the Vatican Bank on easy terms? What does Lois Lane have to do with it?

 

[dafydd]

You don't know where His Serene Knowledge lives? In Oxford, Oxford, Oxford.

http://global.christianpost.com/news/unknown-buyer-obtains-vatican-xxx-web-domain-65490/
Now you know how to surf the net for more info on perverted, soaked-with-evil Christianity. I guess His Serene Knowledge mortgaged his house to build himself a tall cyber-minaret to blow his scientific trumpet from. Lols.
Keep on hacking . . .

I was an atheist long before I heard of Richard Dawkins. I have never read any of his books and I have never seen any of his debates. Why are you so obsessed with the man? Is it a gay thing?

 

[epix]

I was an atheist long before I heard of Richard Dawkins. I have never read any of his books and I have never seen any of his debates. Why are you so obsessed with the man? Is it a gay thing?

The topic in OP revolves around the question whether Jesus can inspire science. There was just one answer which was really cool and very inspiring even though it referred to technology rather than to science, but since both activities are closely related, it counts, as we can see from the case when both science and technology got inspired by Jesus floating on the surface of the lake.



This rather primitive attempt (I mean a conceptual demonstration, sooory. Lol.) can be developed into quite amazing sight.

Acute atheism and its tight close-mindedness can never ponder Biblical "miracles" from any other angle than the one that that subtends the notorious "religion sucks." That's why there has been only one applicable contribution to the topic.

Actually the gravity cancelling was more inspired by the vision of fat grants and other worldly benefits, rather than by giving a second thought to what really constitutes a miracle in the evolving space and time.

Did God use a regular technology to lift Jesus up above the waves?

That's very unlikely. He just made sure that the fictitious account got through described in very particular words. It's less expensive and also an energy-saving option.

 

[tsig]

When Jesus died he went to heaven and the first thing he did was start searching for his father. He really was eager to see what he looked like and wanted to meet him so badly.

He started searching and saw this old white-bearded man walking towards him and stooped over a walking stick. So he rushed to him,

When the man saw Jesus he asked him if he had seen his son.

Jesus asked him what his son was like.

The man said: "if you saw him you would know him. He has holes in his hands and feet because he was nailed to a wooden cross."

So Jesus screamed: "father we are together at last."

The man screamed: "Pinocchio my son."

Reading this I realized that god abandoned his child and never paid any child support so he's a deadbeat dad.

 

[tsig]

How can he respond? The ''equation'' is bollocks.

Well I used it to calculate how many angels could dance on the head of a pin and where the event horizon of the formless is.

 

[dafydd]

The topic in OP revolves around the question whether Jesus can inspire science. There was just one answer which was really cool and very inspiring even though it referred to technology rather than to science, but since both activities are closely related, it counts, as we can see from the case when both science and technology got inspired by Jesus floating on the surface of the lake.



This rather primitive attempt (I mean a conceptual demonstration, sooory. Lol.) can be developed into quite amazing sight.

Acute atheism and its tight close-mindedness can never ponder Biblical "miracles" from any other angle than the one that that subtends the notorious "religion sucks." That's why there has been only one applicable contribution to the topic.

Actually the gravity cancelling was more inspired by the vision of fat grants and other worldly benefits, rather than by giving a second thought to what really constitutes a miracle in the evolving space and time.

Did God use a regular technology to lift Jesus up above the waves?
That's very unlikely. He just made sure that the fictitious account got through described in very particular words. It's less expensive and also an energy-saving option.

Jesus was never lifted above the waves. That is a fairy story. I was trying to point out to you that not all atheists take their lead from Richard Dawkins. I know almost nothing about him. I knew that god was a delusion long before Dawkins wrote that book which I have never read. You seem to have a fixation about him.

 

[Mudcat]

What are you babbling about?

I=V/R

This is as simple as equations get, epix fail, so I am using it in hopes of the point sinks into your thick skull. IVR in the equation are all variables in that equation and tell you what information is needed. In this case I is the current through the conductor in units of amperes, V is the potential difference measured across the conductor in units of volts, and R is the resistance of the conductor in units of ohms.

What does the variables in your magic equation mean?

Protip: It has nothing to do with God.

Others, like SezMe, didn't have a bit of problem to follow a simple instruction.

²=2 doesn't mean anything independently of the rest of the equation, epix fail.

Edit: Just read the wiki article on your equation... I was right, you are intentionally misrepresenting it. Here it is as it should be:

or

The Bond number is a measure of the importance of surface tension forces compared to body forces. A high Bond number indicates that the system is relatively unaffected by surface tension effects; a low number (typically less than one is the requirement) indicates that surface tension dominates. Intermediate numbers indicate a non-trivial balance between the two effects.

One over the Bond Number, ie. 1 / Bo is sometimes referred to as the Jesus number, Je, since bodies can walk on water if they have a large Jesus number, that is if Je > > 1.

The Bond number is the most common comparison of gravity and surface tension effects and it may be derived in a number of ways, such as scaling the pressure of a drop of liquid on a solid surface. It is usually important, however, to find the right length scale specific to a problem by doing a ground-up scale analysis. Other dimensionless numbers are related to the Bond number:

Bo = Eo = 2 Go² = 2 De²,

Where Eo,Go, and De are respectively the Eötvös, Goucher, and Deryagin numbers. The "difference" between the Goucher and Deryagin numbers is that the Goucher number (arises in wire coating problems) uses the letter R to represent length scales while the Deryagin number (arises in plate film thickness problems) uses L.

Jesus number is a colloquialism I would guess right off hand, other than that you still fail.

 

[epix]

What do o and O represent?

The question is an obvious nightmare considering the proximity:

What do o and O represent?

Like lower-case and upper-case "O"?

But that's not something unexpected. We had the opportunity to witness a major collapse of reason taking place within this thread - a collapse triggered by a simple question: Is the statement inside "Go" and "D" true or false?

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²
A person of a strong atheistic persuasion couldn't answer, coz he/she was actually unable to identify that statement. The implication was super-scary. Let me explain . . .

The Neanderthals always preferred to live in caves that protected them against elements. But some animals hold the same opinion and so when a group of the Neanderthals came across a nice cave, they sent the fastest member to see what was inside it, coz that cave might have been already rented by a bear. The Neanderthals didn't seem to have any problem to see what was or wasn't inside the caves, coz they had been around for some two hundred thousand years, not going extinct due to the cave-dwelling bears. Some fifty thousand years later, a member of a superior species couldn't figure out what was inside "Go" and "D".

Naw.

Yeeaah.

The worst came to the worst. Those folks, who suspect that all the superlatives that the churchgoers dress God into are a fiction, are right: God didn't do a good job, and he mentioned that he might start all over again to fix the bugs. That, of course, would mean the devolution of human species down to Africa and up the trees via the caves of Southern France. Now the evidence that God actually stood by his words is out, coz we just discovered the first devolving species: Homo atheistensis australis.

But further study revealed that this species devolved directly from Homo atheisthensis - which has larger frontal lobes and is less susceptible to MUD cataract and therefore can see better:

It looks to me that what's "inside" your GoD is:

² = 2

which makes no sense .... which makes perfect sense.

The contradictory remark is not really pure logical contradiction - it's just a result of a confusion brought about by facing an arrangement not indigenous to the usual environment laden with social intolerance preaching.

But not all is lost. Where is "Go D" there could be Jesus the Savior. That is true, coz the multiple identity where "Go D" is hiding is immediately preceded by "Jesus number," and that means "Jesus to the rescue . . ."

Jesus enters the test room . . .

Alright. Do you think that the following statement is true, or do you think it is false?

² = 2

Uhm . . . the statement is true, for two equals two.

Good. But you should consider also the Word of God.

God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.
Genesis 1:16

In that case the statement is false, for smaller number cannot equal larger number - like 1 cannot equal 16.

So would you prefer "two equals two" or "smaller number doesn't equal larger number?" Please smooth your judgement and finalize your answer. Chose wisely, for if you miss, the devolution of human species will go on all the way up to the gum trees of Southern Kenya. Go, take some rest, think it over and come back - you know, the Second Coming . . .

THUD

WTF

Jesus, dude, I thought that you could walk on water. Lols.

 

[dafydd]

The question is an obvious nightmare considering the proximity:

Like lower-case and upper-case "O"?

But that's not something unexpected. We had the opportunity to witness a major collapse of reason taking place within this thread - a collapse triggered by a simple question: Is the statement inside "Go" and "D" true or false?

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²
A person of a strong atheistic persuasion couldn't answer, coz he/she was actually unable to identify that statement. The implication was super-scary. Let me explain . . .

The Neanderthals always preferred to live in caves that protected them against elements. But some animals hold the same opinion and so when a group of the Neanderthals came across a nice cave, they sent the fastest member to see what was inside it, coz that cave might have been already rented by a bear. The Neanderthals didn't seem to have any problem to see what was or wasn't inside the caves, coz they had been around for some two hundred thousand years, not going extinct due to the cave-dwelling bears. Some fifty thousand years later, a member of a superior species couldn't figure out what was inside "Go" and "D".

Naw.

Yeeaah.

The worst came to the worst. Those folks, who suspect that all the superlatives that the churchgoers dress God into are a fiction, are right: God didn't do a good job, and he mentioned that he might start all over again to fix the bugs. That, of course, would mean the devolution of human species down to Africa and up the trees via the caves of Southern France. Now the evidence that God actually stood by his words is out, coz we just discovered the first devolving species: Homo atheistensis australis.

But further study revealed that this species devolved directly from Homo atheisthensis - which has larger frontal lobes and is less susceptible to MUD cataract and therefore can see better:



The contradictory remark is not really pure logical contradiction - it's just a result of a confusion brought about by facing an arrangement not indigenous to the usual environment laden with social intolerance preaching.

But not all is lost. Where is "Go D" there could be Jesus the Savior. That is true, coz the multiple identity where "Go D" is hiding is immediately preceded by "Jesus number," and that means "Jesus to the rescue . . ."

Jesus enters the test room . . .

Alright. Do you think that the following statement is true, or do you think it is false?

² = 2

Uhm . . . the statement is true, for two equals two.

Good. But you should consider also the Word of God.


In that case the statement is false, for smaller number cannot equal larger number - like 1 cannot equal 16.

So would you prefer "two equals two" or "smaller number doesn't equal larger number?" Please smooth your judgement and finalize your answer. Chose wisely, for if you miss, the devolution of human species will go on all the way up to the gum trees of Southern Kenya. Go, take some rest, think it over and come back - you know, the Second Coming . . .

THUD

WTF

Jesus, dude, I thought that you could walk on water. Lols.

Wow, I didn't think that you could descend into gibberish and incoherency any deeper, but you did. Total bollocks. Numbers meaning 'Jesus to the rescue.'? Hilarious.

 

[Leumas]

The Neanderthals always preferred to live in caves that protected them against elements. But some animals hold the same opinion and so when a group of the Neanderthals came across a nice cave, they sent the fastest member to see what was inside it, coz that cave might have been already rented by a bear. The Neanderthals didn't seem to have any problem to see what was or wasn't inside the caves, coz they had been around for some two hundred thousand years, not going extinct due to the cave-dwelling bears.

So how do you know what Neanderthals did or did not do? How exactly did you ascertain this?

Some fifty thousand years later, a member of a superior species couldn't figure out what was inside "Go" and "D".

And what does this have to do with Neanderthals and caves?

 

[dafydd]

So how do you know what Neanderthals did or did not do? How exactly did you ascertain this?

Our straight A student knows everything.

 

[Rincewind]

epix,

Of course the equation doesn't show "Go" and "D" in fact.

It shows "Go" and "De" - so do you really worship a creature called Gode?

Inquiring minds want to know....

 

[Toontown]

Jesus could have used his bully pulpit to inspire science, if he had known anything about science, which he didn't. He would have been far more credible as a Messiah if he had known something about science. Perhaps he could have actually fullfilled the Messiah prophecies by actually taking over and ruling the world, ending all suffering, and even death.

But since he didn't know nothin about science, all he could do was get crucified, which was later rationalized by his followers as somehow making it easier for God to forgive us for being what He made us in the first place - sinners. Which kind of makes a guy wonder about thought processes of a diety...

God: "I feel much more beneficent, now that those sinners have brutalized my son. Now I can forgive them."

Jesus: "Why do you hate me, Dad? I spend 3 decades living among your little creations, trying to teach them the basics about the Golden Rule as best I could. And what do you do? You go and shatter the Golden Rule and stomp on the pieces. And that makes you feel beneficent, or something. You are a wierd old man, Dad. One of these days I'm going to overthrow your Ass, like Satan tried. And then you will have your turn on the cross, and we'll see how you like it. After all, that must be what you want, if you're actually following the Golden Rule, doing unto others as you would have done unto you."

Super God: I'm going to nail both of your sorry asses if you don't clean up your act. Oh, you didn't know I exist? Well, surprise surprise. Who do you think made your asses? The Void?

 

[Mudcat]

But that's not something unexpected. We had the opportunity to witness a major collapse of reason taking place within this thread - a collapse triggered by a simple question: Is the statement inside "Go" and "D" true or false?

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

Hey brain trust, how many times do I have to tell you, ²=2 does not mean anything by itself. THey tell you what math is being done in a specific equation. All the letters (the upper case stuff with their partner lower case letters) are variables, here what is in case you missed my earlier post:

The Bond number is the most common comparison of gravity and surface tension effects and it may be derived in a number of ways, such as scaling the pressure of a drop of liquid on a solid surface. It is usually important, however, to find the right length scale specific to a problem by doing a ground-up scale analysis. Other dimensionless numbers are related to the Bond number:

Bo = Eo = 2 Go² = 2 De²,

Where Eo,Go, and De are respectively the Eötvös, Goucher, and Deryagin numbers. The "difference" between the Goucher and Deryagin numbers is that the Goucher number (arises in wire coating problems) uses the letter R to represent length scales while the Deryagin number (arises in plate film thickness problems) uses L.

Stop misrepresenting it already, it has nothing to do with Jesus or Yahweh.