Can Jesus Inspire Science?

[Leumas]

Do they have holes in them?

When Jesus died he went to heaven and the first thing he did was start searching for his father. He really was eager to see what he looked like and wanted to meet him so badly.

He started searching and saw this old white-bearded man walking towards him and stooped over a walking stick. So he rushed to him,

When the man saw Jesus he asked him if he had seen his son.

Jesus asked him what his son was like.

The man said: "if you saw him you would know him. He has holes in his hands and feet because he was nailed to a wooden cross."

So Jesus screamed: "father we are together at last."

The man screamed: "Pinocchio my son."

 

[epix]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

Taking confirmation bias a bit far today Epix Fail?

How far did I take it? Your miserable failure to compute the actual distance that the "bias" traveled just contributes to the idea that atheism, the antitheist branch, is based on nothing else but emotional beliefs and got nothing to do with rationality.

But if you make the attempt to distance yourself from the literal creationists with whom you share various argument techniques, look again what is inside GoD. Is that statement true or false? You shouldn't flunk this question if you belong to the species that call themselves "Man the Wise."

 

[Mudcat]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

How far did I take it?

I didn't take it anywhere, I never seen math like that before in my life.

Your miserable failure to compute the actual distance that the "bias" traveled just contributes to the idea that atheism, the antitheist branch, is based on nothing else but emotional beliefs and got nothing to do with rationality.

You have a reaction like that and accuse me of argument from emotion?

But if you make the attempt to distance yourself from the literal creationists with whom you share various argument techniques, look again what is inside GoD.

Math isn't my strong suit, and I never seen math like that in my life. I have no idea what variables are being represented in the equation, however I'm fairly certain it isn't what you are intentionally misrepresenting it as.

Is that statement true or false? You shouldn't flunk this question if you belong to the species that call themselves "Man the Wise."

I have no idea what the equation is, but I'm fairly sure it is more Epix Fail.

 

[SonOfLaertes]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

How far did I take it? Your miserable failure to compute the actual distance that the "bias" traveled just contributes to the idea that atheism, the antitheist branch, is based on nothing else but emotional beliefs and got nothing to do with rationality.

But if you make the attempt to distance yourself from the literal creationists with whom you share various argument techniques, look again what is inside GoD. Is that statement true or false? You shouldn't flunk this question if you belong to the species that call themselves "Man the Wise."

So you were serious about your little highlighted letters in that formula. Amazing.

 

[dafydd]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

How far did I take it? Your miserable failure to compute the actual distance that the "bias" traveled just contributes to the idea that atheism, the antitheist branch, is based on nothing else but emotional beliefs and got nothing to do with rationality.

But if you make the attempt to distance yourself from the literal creationists with whom you share various argument techniques, look again what is inside GoD. Is that statement true or false? You shouldn't flunk this question if you belong to the species that call themselves "Man the Wise."

Body odor equals what? The anti-theist branch of atheism? Which branch of atheism is pro-theist? Religion has nothing to do with rationality, your post proves that. The second highlighted part is not a statement. It is neither true nor false, just you sounding of meaninglessly again.

 

[dafydd]

So you were serious about your little highlighted letters in that formula. Amazing.

Straight A's in science! Break out the laughing dogs.

 

[Mudcat]

Body odor equals what?

Is that what the equation is about?

 

[zooterkin]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

How far did I take it? Your miserable failure to compute the actual distance that the "bias" traveled just contributes to the idea that atheism, the antitheist branch, is based on nothing else but emotional beliefs and got nothing to do with rationality.

But if you make the attempt to distance yourself from the literal creationists with whom you share various argument techniques, look again what is inside GoD. Is that statement true or false? You shouldn't flunk this question if you belong to the species that call themselves "Man the Wise."

Stick to Doron's thread, where you have a chance of not being the worst mathematician taking part.

 

[dafydd]

Is that what the equation is about?

Search me. Ask epix the straight A student.

 

[Mudcat]

Search me. Ask epix the straight A student.

Must be a school with low standards. Very low standards. Lower than the lowest point of the Mariana Trench.

 

[dafydd]

Must be a school with low standards. Very low standards. Lower than the lowest point of the Mariana Trench.

He said that he never left school. We are still waiting for an explanation. Wait a minute, he must be a janitor.

 

[epix]

I have no idea what the equation is, but I'm fairly sure it is more Epix Fail.

What equation are you referring to? That's not an equation, but a multiple identity - ask any high school kid if you don't believe me.

The literal creationists are also always fairly sure about stuff . . .

 

[SezMe]

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

It looks to me that what's "inside" your GoD is:

² = 2

which makes no sense .... which makes perfect sense.

 

[dafydd]

What equation are you referring to? That's not an equation, but a multiple identity - ask any high school kid if you don't believe me.

The literal creationists are also always fairly sure about stuff . . .

Multiple Identity. Ah, you know all about matrix theory? Solve this for me.

Suppose a square, dense, symmetric matrix A has been factorized into L and U components by performing a LU decomposition. Now let B=X+λI .Is there any way to efficiently compute the LU decomposition of B by reusing L and U,avoiding the use of a new decomposition?

Put your straight A's to good use.

 

[Mudcat]

What equation are you referring to?

This:

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

Explain it or drop it.

That's not an equation, but a multiple identity

Explain it or drop it.

ask any high school kid if you don't believe me.

I did (my brother, who is much handier at math than I am) and he had no clue either.

The literal creationists are also always fairly sure about stuff . . .

Yeah, not a sound argument there, epix fail.

 

[dafydd]

I did (my brother, who is much handier at math than I am) and he had no clue either.

Multiples of identities are used in matrix theory but epix probably thinks that has something to do with movies.

 

[epix]

Stick to Doron's thread, where you have a chance of not being the worst mathematician taking part.

What difference would it make? It's Doronetics all over the place. LOL.

Btw, I didn't compute anything. So where did you squeeze the result from that inspired you to turn categorical?

 

[dafydd]

What difference would it make? It's Doronetics all over the place. LOL.

Btw, I didn't compute anything. So where did you squeeze the result from that inspired you to turn categorical?

So we can take it that your equation or multiple identity is total bollocks? We know that you can't compute anything.

 

[epix]

This:

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²
Explain it or drop it.

I asked you to look INSIDE GoD, or to look between "Go" and "D". To make sure that you don't fail again to follow a simple instruction, post what you see between Go and D.

 

[dafydd]

I asked you to look INSIDE GoD, or to look between "Go" and "D". To make sure that you don't fail again to follow a simple instruction, post what you see between Go and D.

Only one problem there. You cannot look into an imaginary being.